Skip to main content

Abstract

Studies of China-European Union (EU) relations tend to privilege interestfocused explanations.1 In such accounts, China’s main goals in its relations with Europe are usually presented as material—the pursuit of increased trade and investments intended to boost China’s economy. Sometimes, they are also presented as status seeking, as China viewing the EU as a potential great power alternative to US hegemony. Moreover, interaction with great powers—the United States, Russia, and the EU—is believed to confer on China the status of a great power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Benedict. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, W. A. (2006). “History, Identity, and Security: Producing and Consuming Nationalism in China,” CriticalAsian Studies, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, W. A. (2004). “National Insecurities: Humiliation, Salvation and Chinese Nationalism.” Alternatives, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, W. A. (2010). China: The Pessoptimist Nation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, W. A. (2013). China Dreams: 20 Visions of the Future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Zhimin et al. (eds.) (2011). Zhongguo, meiguo yu ouzhou: xin san bian guartxi zhong de hezuo yu jingzhen [China, the US and Europe: Cooperation and Competition in a New Triangular Relationship]. Shanghai: Shanghai Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Zhimin and Armstrong John. (2010). “China’s Relationship with Europe: Towards a More ‘Normal’ Relationship?,” in Shaun Breslin (ed.), Handbook of China’s International Relations. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 156–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, H., and van der Noll, J. (2011). “Chinese Citizens’ Attitudes towards the European Union and Their Origins.” Seventh Framework Programme Theme 8: Disaggregating Chinese Perceptions of the EU and the Implications for the EU’s China Policy. Policy Paper Series: Issue 1, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikotter, Frank. (1992), The Discourse of Race in Modern China. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorjee, Tenzin. (2013). “Diplomacy or Mobilization: The Tibetan Dilemma in the Struggle with China,” in Bae Jung-Ho and Jae H. Ku (eds.), China’s Internal and External Relations and Lessons for Korea and Asia. Seoul: Korea Institute for National Unification, pp. 63–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. (1993). Ethnicity andNationalism. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Zhongping. (2008). “A Chinese Perspective on China-European Relations,” in Giovanni Grevi and Alvaro de Vasconcelos (eds.), Partnerships for Effective Multilateralism: EURelations with Brazil, China, India and Russia, Chaillot Paper no. 109. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, pp. 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsby, A. B. (2011). “An End to Harmony? The Rise of a Sino-Centric China,” Political Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, John and Francois Godement. (2009). “A Power Audit of EU-China Relations,” Policy Report, European Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, M. C. (2004). “The Rise of Neo-nationalism and the New Left: A Postcolonial and Postmodern Perspective,” in H. L. Leong and S. Wang (eds.), Nationalism, Democracy and National Integration in China. London: Routledge Curzon, pp. 44–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garver, John W. (1997). Face Off China, the United States and Taiwan’s Democratization. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Gerrit W. (1984). “China’s Entry into International Society,” in Hedley Bull and Adam Watson (eds.), The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Richard. (ed.). (1995). The European Union and China: A European Strategy for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge/RHA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Yingjie. (2004). Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary China: the Search for National Identity under Reform. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hermansen, Maria L. (2012). Public Opinion and China-Europe Relations, Master thesis submitted to Leiden University, at https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/ handle/1887/19411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, Ted. (2002). Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde-Price, Adrian. (2004). “European Security, Strategic Culture, and the Use of Force,” European Security, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. P., and Nexon, D. (1999). “Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics,” European journal of International Relations, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 291–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, Martin. (2009). When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Ling. (2008). “Ruanquanli Lilun (Theory of Soft Power),” in Qin, Yaqing (ed.), Guannian, Zhidu yu Zhengce: Oumeng Ruanquanli Yanjiu (Ideas, Institutions and Policies: A Study of European Union’s Soft Power. Beijing: World Affairs Press, pp. 25–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju, E. (2011). “The Chinese Paradox of Extraction Industry Transparency,” World Affairs, Vol. 5, pp. 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenner, Wolfgang. (September 2005). “Economic Relations between the EU and China: Evolution of an Exclusive Partnership?,” China: An International Journal, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard Ned. (2008). “Identity and International Relations,” International Relations, Vol. 22, pp. 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (2003). “The Global and the National of the Chinese Media: Discourses, Market, Technology and Ideology,” in C. Lee (ed.), Chinese Media, Global Contexts. London: Routledge Curzon, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Anshan. (2007). “China and Africa: Policy and Challenges,” China Security Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Mingjiang. (2009). “China-EU Relations: Strategic Partnership at a Crossroads,” China: An International Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 227–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, J. (2008). “Prologue: Beijing 2008—The Mixed Messages of Contemporary Chinese Nationalism,” The International Journal of the History of Sport, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 758–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners, Ian. (2002). “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” The Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlary, Janne Haaland. (2006). “When Soft Power Turns Hard: Is an EU Strategic Culture Possible?” Security Dialogue, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 114–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Men, Jing. (November 2006). “Chinese Perceptions of the European Union: A Review of Leading Chinese Journals,” European LawJournal, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 788–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, A. (2012). “China and the EU: Conceptual Gaps in Soft Power,” in Z. Pan (ed.), Conceptual Gaps in China-EURelations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. (1996). “Self and Other in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 2, pp. 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning, Liao. (2013). “Dualistic Identity, Memory-Encoded Norms, and State Emotion: A Social Constructivist Account of Chinese Foreign Relations,” East Asia Vol. 30, pp. 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, Nicholas. (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule of Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polumbaum, J. (2012). “Capturing the Flame: Aspirations and Representations of Beijing’s 2008 Olympics,” in C. Lee (ed.), Chinese Media, Global Contexts. London: Routledge Curzon, pp. 56–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, Lucian. (1992). TheSpirit of Chinese Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Yaqing. (2003). “National Identity, Strategic Culture, and Security Interests: Three Hypotheses on the Relationship between China and International Society” World Economics and Politics, Vol. 1, pp. 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Yaqing. (2009). “Relationality and Processual Construction: Bringing Chinese Ideas into International Relations Theory” Social Sciences in China, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Yaqing. (2010). “Struggle for ldentity: A Political Psychology of China’s Rise,” in B. Womack (ed.), China’s Rise in HistoricalPerspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Yaqing. (2011). “Rule, Rules and Relations: Towards a Synthetic Approach to Governance,” Chinese. Journal of InternationalPolitics, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 117–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, X. (2010). “The International Relations Theoretical Discourse in China: One World, Different Explanations,” Journal of Chinese Political Science, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (2012). “Chinese Media and Youth: Attitudes towards Nationalism and Internationalism,” in C. Lee (ed.), Chinese Media, Global Contexts. London: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynning, S. (2003). “The European Union: Towards a Strategic Culture?” Security Dialogue, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. A. (2013). “Multipolarity, Mukilateralism and Beyond … ? EU-China Understandings of the International System,” International Relations, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, David. (September 2004). “China and Europe: The Emerging Axis,” Current History, Vol. 103, No. 674, pp. 243–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, David. (2005). “The New Strategic Triangle: US and European Reactions to China’s Rise,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, David. (2007). “China-Europe Relations Get Complicated,” Brookings Northeast Asia Commentary. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/research/ opinions/2007/05/china-shambaugh (accessed October 4, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y. (2008). “U.S.-European Rapprochement, Sino-European Estrangement and China’s Strategic Needs,” Contemporary International Relations, Vol. 5, pp. 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, C. Y. (1988). “National Role Conception as Foreign Policy Motivation: The Psycho-Cultural Bases of Chinese Diplomacy,” Political Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 626–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, C., and J. Yin. (2013). “Between Core National Interest and a Harmonious World: Reconciling Self-role Conceptions in Chinese Foreign Policy,” Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 6, pp. 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Xinning and Gerald Chan. (2000). “International Relations Theory in China,” in Weixing Hu, Gerlad Chan, and Daojiong Zha (eds.), China’s International Relations in the 21st Century: Dynamics of Paradigm Shifts. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael, and Huaixian Xie. (2010). “The European Union, China and the United States: Complex Interdependence and Bi-Multilateralism in Commercial Relations,” in Georg Wiessala et al. (eds.), European Studies: A Jurnal of European Culture, History and Politics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Brent J. (2008). Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L. (2012). The “Deep Structure” of Chinese Culture . Guilin: Guangxi Normal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting, Wai. (2011). “EU-China Relations in the Age of Globalization and Regionalization,” Eur America, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 181–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend-Bell, Erica. (2007). “Identities Matter: Identiry Politics, Coalition Possibilities, and Feminist Organising,” Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa. Retrieved from http://ir.uiowa.edu/polisci_pubs/10/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty on European Union and Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2007). At http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:12012M/TXT:

  • Uemura, T. (2013). “Understanding Sino-Japanese Relations: Proposing a Constructivist Approach in Chinese Studies,” Journal of Contemporary China Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 95–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ginneken, J. (1998). Understanding Global News. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Védrine, Hubert. (2001). France in an Age of Globalization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Gungwu. (1991). China and the Chinese Overseas. Singapore: Times Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2009). “The Identiry Dilemmas of EU Normative Power: Observations from Chinese Traditional Culture,” in A. Gerrits (ed.), Normative Power Europe in a Changing World.• A Discussion. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute of International Relations, pp. 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2010). “Clash of Identities: Why China and the EU Are Inharmonious in Global Governance.” UNISCI Discussion Papers, No. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2012). “Seeking China’s New Identity: The Myth of Chinese Nationalism.” In C. Tuo (ed.), Chinese Perspectives on Globalisation and Autonomy. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Reuben. (2006). The Europeanization of French Foreign Policy; France and the EU in East Asia. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Reuben. (2012). “Perspectives on China’s Relations with the European Union,” in Emilian Kavalski (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Chinese Foreign Policy. Abingdon: Ashgate, pp. 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Reuben. (2013a). “The Issue of Identiry in the EU-China Relationship,” Politique Européenne, Vol. 39, pp. 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Reuben. (2013b). “China’s Rise: Making Sense of EU Responses,” Journal of Contemporary China Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., and J. Zhao. (2009). 60 Years of the New China: Looking Back and Reflections on the History of China-EURelations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahuda, M. B. (1994). “China and Europe: The Significance of a Secondary Relationship,” in Thomas W, Robinson and David Shambaugh (eds.), Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory &Practice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 266–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Xuetong. (2008). “Xun Zi’s Thoughts on International Politics and Their Implications,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 135–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y. (2012). “Normative Power Europe: Ideational Factors in EU’s Foreign Policies towards China and China’s perceptions.” Master’s Thesis, Leiden University, at https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/19317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Yongnian. (2000). “Nationalism, Globalism, and China’s International Relations,” in W. Hu, G. Chan, and D. Zha (eds.), China’s International Relations in the 21st Century: Dynamics of Paradigm Shifts. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Liqun. (2010). “China’s Foreign Policy Debates,” Chaillot Papers, No. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, David, and Chen Zhimin (eds.) (2007) China’s Reforms and International Political Economy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jianwei Wang Weiqing Song

Copyright information

© 2016 Knud Erik Jørgensen and Reuben Wong

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jørgensen, K.E., Wong, R. (2016). Social Constructivist Perspectives on China-Eu Relations. In: Wang, J., Song, W. (eds) China, the European Union, and the International Politics of Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514004_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics