Skip to main content

A Liberal Institutionalist Perspective on China-EU Relations

  • Chapter

Abstract

The People’s Republic of China and the European Union (EU)’ are fairly recent arrivals to the international system, both having been established in the aftermath of the Second World War, and both having taken some time before rising to global prominence. However, since 2015 China and the EU have become the top two economies in the world, and they also are each other’s biggest trading partners. The year 2015 marked the fortieth anniversary of the launch of diplomatic relations between the two sides, and since 2003, China and the EU have also recognized each other as “strategic partners” (Reiterer 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bickerton, C. (2012). European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C. (2012). European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (2005). “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework,” International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 801–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekengren, M. (2002). The Time of European Governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (2003). A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (2013). EU-China 2020 Strategic Agenda for Cooperation. Brussels: European Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioretos, O. (2011). “Historical Institutionalism in International Relations,” International Organization, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 367–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, K. H. and J.-H. Meyer-Sahling. (2009). “Political Time in the EU: Dimensions, Perspectives, Theories,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 180–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirono, M. and M. Lanteigne. (2011). “Introduction: China and UN Peacekeeping,” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (2005). “Several Roads Lead to International Norms, but Few via International Socialization: A Case Study of the European Commission,” International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 861–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetschke, A. and P. Murray. (2012). “Diffusing Regional Integration: The EU and Southeast Asia,” West European Politics, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juncos, A. E. and K. Pomorska. (2013). “`In the Face of Adversity’: Explaining the Attitudes of EEAS Officials vis-à-vis the New Service,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 1332–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. (2003). “Path Dependency and the CAP,”. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. and L. L. Martin. (1995). “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, E., T. Christiansen, and H. Dorussen. (2015). EU-China Security Cooperation in Context. Robert Schuman Centre Working Paper No. 2015/31, EUI, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissack, R. (2013). “The European Union and Multilateralism,” in K. E. Jergensen and K. V. Laatikainen (eds.), Routledge Handbook on the European Union and International Institutions: Performance, Policy, Power. London: Routledge, pp. 405–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2005). “The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union,” International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 937–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 5–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menegazzi, S. (2012). China Reinterprets the Liberal Peace. IAI Working Papers, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1993). Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Center for International Affairs Working Paper Series 92–6, Harvard University, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2000). “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raube, K. (2012). “The European External Action Service and the European Parliament,” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiterer, M. (2013). “The Role of Strategic Partnerships in EU Relations with East Asia,” in T. Christiansen, E. Kirchner, and P. Murray (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of EU—Asia Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiterer, M. (2014). “The Role of Culture in EU-China Relations,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 135–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard, T. (2011). The Treachery of Strategies: A Call for True EUStrategic Partnerships. Brussels: Egmont Institute Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard, T. (2015). The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB): China’s New Multilateralism and the Erosion of the West. Egmont Security Brief No. 63, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosén, G. (2014) ‘EU Confidential: The European Parliament’s Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 383–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (2000). “Federalism and the Euro-Polity,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone Sweet, A. and W. Sandholtz. 1997. “European Integration and Supranational Governance,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2004). “Re-Socializing Civil Servants: The Transformative Powers of EU Institutions,” Acta Politica, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 4–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagnsson, C. (2010). “Divided Power Europe: Normative Divergences among the EU ‘Big Three’,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 1089–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. (1983). “Less than a Federation, More than a Regime: The Community as a Political System,” in H. Wallace et al. (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Community. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. (2015). Reform of Chinese Foreign Policy Decision-Making System under the New Leadership, paper presented at the College of Europe Conference, Brussels, May 3, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warleigh, A. (2001). “`Europeanizing’ Civil Society: NGOs as Agents of Political Socialization,” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 619–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, J. and M. Burnay. (2011). The EUAndAsia in the United Nations Security Council. Working Paper No. 78. Leuven: Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. (2015). “Does the Academic Programme Work? The Jean Monnet Programme and European Union Public Diplomacy,” Journal of European Integration (May): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, L. H. (2013). “The Asia-Europe Meeting,” in T. Christiansen, E. Kirchner, and P. Murray (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of EU—Asia Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 330–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, J. (2013). “The International System in Europe: Westphalian Anarchy or Medieval Chaos?,” Journal of European Integration, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jianwei Wang Weiqing Song

Copyright information

© 2016 Thomas Christiansen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Christiansen, T. (2016). A Liberal Institutionalist Perspective on China-EU Relations. In: Wang, J., Song, W. (eds) China, the European Union, and the International Politics of Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514004_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics