Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Close Readings in Film and Television ((CRFT))

  • 560 Accesses

Abstract

This book appreciates the artistry of Breaking Bad (AMC, 2008–2013). The series was prominent among a crop of expensive, ‘high end’ television serials from the US, the UK, and Europe that, from the 1990s onwards, drew frequent acclaim for extending and deepening television fiction’s narrative and stylistic palette and its range of related achievements. A common touchstone for this discourse was the adjective ‘cinematic’. As a term of both description and appreciative judgement, it was deployed with regularity in response to series such as, among others, The Sopranos (HBO, 1999–2007), Six Feet Under (HBO, 2001–2005), Mad Men (AMC, 2007–2015), Forbrydelsen (The Killing) (DR1, 2007–2012), Game of Thrones (HBO, 2010-), Hannibal (NBC, 2013-), and Top of the Lake (BBC Two, 2013). This suggested a view that the television dramas so described were aspiring to, and presumably in some cases realising, a ‘height’ of richness or sophistication of film style that had earlier been seen as the sole preserve of cinema. In Jason Jacobs’s words, the validation of some television dramas in terms of their so-called ‘cinematic’ qualities can be understood as responding to the idea that television fiction had been ‘textually anaemic when compared to film or literature’.1Readily available statements by key practitioners, among them some of Breaking Bad’s central creative personnel, do not discount intentions to work within certain cinematic traditions. As well, the following chapters demonstrate how, in the case of Breaking Bad, certain films may often provide appropriate registers of comparison with the period’s television serials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Jacobs (2001) ‘Issues of Judgement and Value in Television Studies’ International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4.4, 434. Jacobs discusses the ‘cinematic’ in relation to television drama in the context of analysing expressive achievement in medical dramas of the 1990s, yet the historical roots of this trend extend more deeply into the history of television production.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For example see J.P. Telotte (2010) ‘In the Cinematic Zone of The Twilight Zone’ Science Fiction Film and Television, 3.1, 1–17. There are also national contexts in which these overlaps take specific form, for example in European film and television production.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See the discussions in: S. Peacock (2014) Swedish Crime Fiction: Novel, Film, Television (Manchester: Manchester University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. S. O’Sullivan (2009) ‘The Decalogue and the Remaking of American Television’ in S. Woodward (ed.) After Kieslowski: The Legacy of Krzysztof Kieslowski (Detroit: Wayne State University Press), pp. 202–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tensions between unity and fragmentation, part and whole are important to early theoretical conceptualisations of television, broadly understood in terms of ‘flow’ between ‘segments’ of broadcast transmission. See: R. Williams (2003) Television: Technology and Cultural Form, Classics edn (London: Routledge), pp. 77–120

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Ellis (1992) Visible Fictions: Cinema, Television, Video, Revised edn (London: Routledge), pp. 115–26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.J. Clover (1993) ‘Falling Down and the Culture of Complaint’ The Threepenny Review, 54, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.P. Pierson (2014) Breaking Bad: Critical Essays on the Contexts, Politics, Style, and Reception of the Television Series (Lanham: Lexington Books). See especially the section titled ‘The Politics of Breaking Bad’.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See: A. Clayton (2011) ‘Coming to Terms’ in A. Clayton and A. Klevan (eds) The Language and Style of Film Criticism (London: Routledge), pp. 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. This difficulty stems from the diminished clarity and force of moral language and concepts in contemporary secular societies. For an illuminating discussion of this context and how it gives rise to potentially enriching or violent desires for a renewed sense of the moral and ethical dimensions of human life, see S. Neiman (2008) Moral Clarity: A Guide for Grown-up Idealists (Orlando: Harcourt).

    Google Scholar 

  11. For an exemplary account of this trope’s significance in these terms, see G. Perez (1998) The Material Ghost: Films and their Medium (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press), pp. 237–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Pippin (2010) Hollywood Westerns and American Myth: The Importance of John Ford and Howard Hawks for Political Philosophy (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson’s inspiring study of cinematic point of view strikingly demonstrates how seemingly conventional Hollywood films may develop sophisticated alternative perspectives through which ‘central aspects of their interest and significance bear only an oblique relationship to the forms of dramatic closure they employ’. G.M. Wilson (1988) Narration in Light: Studies in Cinematic Point of View, Johns Hopkins Paperback edn (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press), p. 10; original emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Fried (2004) Menzel’s Realism: Art and Embodiment in Nineteenth-Century Berlin (New Haven: Yale University Press), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Fried (1967) ‘Art and Objecthood’ in his (1998) Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 167; original emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  16. In an especially pertinent interrogation, Sianne Ngai questions Fried’s emphasis on ‘conviction’ secured in instantaneous experiences of ‘present-ness’, noting how it excludes from judgements of value modes of ‘ongoing temporality, so central to the serial, diachronic art of the novel’. S. Ngai (2012) Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T.J. Clark (2006) The Sight of Death: An Experiment in Art Writing (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobs eloquently evokes this critical problem through comparison of Deadwood (HBO, 2004–6) with Moby Dick. See J. Jacobs (2012) Deadwood (London: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Ricks (2010) True Friendship: Geoffrey Hill, Anthony Hecht, and Robert Lowell Under the Sign of Eliot and Pound (New Haven: Yale University Press), p. xi. I welcome Ricks’s modification that allows for more than one useful handle.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cf. C. Ricks (2004) Dylan’s Visions of Sin, First American edn (New York: HarperCollins), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Jacobs (2015) ‘Television Drama’ in M. Alvarado, M. Buonanno, H. Gray and T. Miller (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Television Studies (Los Angeles: SAGE Publications), p. 316.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jacobs ‘Television Drama’, p. 317; original emphasis. For a more extended account of such a critical comportment, see: G. Toles (2001) A House Made of Light: Essays on the Art of Film (Detroit: Wayne State University Press), pp. 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Klevan (2000) Disclosure of the Everyday: Undramatic Achievement in Narrative Film (Trowbridge: Flicks Books), p. 2; original emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Clayton and A. Klevan (2010) ‘Introduction: The Language and Style of Film Criticism’ in A. Clayton and A. Klevan (eds) The Language and Style of Film Criticism (London: Routledge), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Cavell (1981) Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), pp. 36–7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Martin (2010) ‘Incursions’ in A. Clayton and A. Klevan (eds) The Language and Style of Film Criticism (London: Routledge), p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V.F. Perkins (1990) ‘Must We Say What They Mean? Film Criticism and Interpretation’ Movie, 34.35, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Klevan (2010) ‘Description’ in A. Clayton and A. Klevan (eds) The Language and Style of Film Criticism (London: Routledge), p. 71; original emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Jacobs and S. Peacock (2013) ‘Introduction’ in J. Jacobs and S. Peacock (eds) Television Aesthetics and Style (London: Bloomsbury Academic), pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Jacobs (2011) ‘The Medium in Crisis: Caughie, Brunsdon and the Problem of US Television’ Screen, 52.4, 510.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Jacobs and S. Peacock (2014) ‘Editorial’ Critical Studies in Television, 9.3, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Cavell (1979) The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Gibbs and D. Pye (2005) ‘Introduction’ in J. Gibbs and D. Pye (eds) Style and Meaning: Studies in the Detailed Analysis of Film (Manchester: Manchester University Press), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. Durgnat (1971) Films and Feelings, First MIT Press paperback edn (Cambridge: MIT Press), p. 173; original emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobs Deadwood and V.F. Perkins (2012) La Règle du jeu (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. Dias Branco (2010) ‘Strung Pieces: On the Aesthetics of Television Fiction Series’ Unpublished dissertation (University of Kent), pp. 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Gibbs (2013) The Life of mise-en-scène: Visual Style and British Film Criticism, 1946–78 (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 169–71.

    Google Scholar 

  38. T. Todorov (1996) Facing the Extreme: Moral Life in the Concentration Camps (New York: Henry Holt).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Todorov Facing the Extreme, pp. 289–90. See also Z. Bauman (1989) Modernity and the Holocaust (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  40. G. Kateb (2011) Human Dignity (Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard University Press), pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. R. Pippin (2000) Henry James and Modern Moral Life, First paperback edn (New York: Cambridge University Press), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  42. For some examples, see H. Newcomb (1974) TV: The Most Popular Art (Garden City: Anchor Books), p. 255

    Google Scholar 

  43. G. Creeber (2004) Serial Television: Big Drama on the Small Screen (London: BFI), and O’Sullivan ‘Broken on Purpose’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Elliott Logan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Logan, E. (2016). Introduction. In: Breaking Bad and Dignity. Palgrave Close Readings in Film and Television. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137513731_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics