Abstract
Thomas Edison is credited with saying that ‘Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration’, suggesting thus that having a creative idea is not the only thing that matters, there is also a lot of hard work involved. He was, in this way, responding to popular beliefs that consider inspiration the real mark of the genius. In fact, the first conceptions of creativity were actually based on the idea of divine inspiration (Sternberg & Lubart, 1999) and the Ancient Greeks, for instance, metaphorically pointed to the muses as the source of true creation. While this image actually locates creativity outside of the person, it was following the Renaissance that genius became ‘internalised’ as biological and hereditary (Montuori & Purser, 1995). Today, such extreme views are avoided but the ethos of attributing creative qualities to the individual continues in research focused on creativity and intelligence, personality, thinking styles, neurological correlates, and so on. This kind of research typically uses ideation/divergent thinking tasks as a measure of creativity (more specifically, ‘creative potential’) and, since it rarely looks at what people actually do, it contributes to the classical separation between inspiration and perspiration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Collingwood, R. G. (1938). The principles of art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cooper, P., & Allen, N. B. (1999). The quilters: Women and domestic art, an oral history. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685–706). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, D. H. (1974). The developmental approach: Universal to unique. In S. Rosner & L. E. Abt (Eds.), Essays in creativity (pp. 47–85). Croton-On-Hudson, NY: North River Press.
Gardner, H. (1994). The creators’ patterns. In M. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 143–158). London: MIT Press/Badford Books.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). Creativity and folk art: A study of creative action in traditional craft. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(2), 140–154.
Glăveanu, V. P., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Creativity, identity, and representation: Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 12–21.
Gorovei, A. (2001). Ouăle de Paşte. Studiu de folclor (2nd edn.). Bucureşti: Paideia.
Kozbelt, A., & Durmysheva, Y. (2007). Lifespan creativity in a non-Western artistic tradition: A study of Japanese ukiyo-e printmakers. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(1), 23–51.
Mall, A. S. (2007). Structure, innovation and agency in pattern construction: The Kōlam of Southern India. In E. Hallam & T. Ingold (Eds.), Creativity and cultural improvisation (pp. 55–78). Oxford: Berg.
Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1995). Deconstructing the lone genius myth: Toward a contextual view of creativity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 35(3), 69–112.
Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. London: Herbert Press.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sternberg, R., & Lubart, T. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt-Brace.
Weisberg, R. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Vlad Petre Glăveanu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glăveanu, V.P. (2016). Craft. In: Glăveanu, V.P., Tanggaard, L., Wegener, C. (eds) Creativity — A New Vocabulary. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137511805_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137511805_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-70246-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51180-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)