Advertisement

Work and Failure: Assessing the Prisons Information Group

  • Perry Zurn

Abstract

Perhaps the most banal question one can ask of an activist effort is this: Did it work? Did you accomplish something? Did you get something done? I want to ask this very banal question of the Prisons Information Group. I do so, however, with the conviction that the philosophical analysis requisite to answering such a question will uncover something significant about the nature of work, about the subject of work, and their relative failures.

Keywords

Criminal Record Prison System Internal Assessment Resistance Movement Black Panther Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Allen Janis, “The Value of Scientific Failure,” in Scientific Failure, ed. Tamara Horowitz and Allen Janis (Washington DC: Rowman and Littlefield, 1994), 13–18.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin Heidegger, Beingand Time, trans. Joan Stambaugh (1927; New York: SUNY, 1996), 68.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1781; Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1988), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    GIP, “(Manifeste du GIP)” (1971), FDE1, no. 86, 1043.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniel Defert, “Quand l’information est une lutte” (1971), FGIP-AL, 69–73; Foucault, “(Sur les prisons)” (1971), FDE1, no. 87, 1043–1044, and “Je perçois l’intolérable” (1971), FDE1, no. 94, 1071–1073.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foucault, “Le grand enfermement” (1972), FDE1, no. 105, 1169.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Gilles Deleuze, Two Regimes of Madness: Texts and Interviews 1975–1995 (Los Angeles: Semiotext[e], 2007), 277.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paul Thibaud, Jean-Marie Domenach, and Foucault, “Toujours les prisons” (1980), FDE2, no. 282, 917.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ibid., 915.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cecile Brich, “The Groupe d’information sur les prisons: The Voice of prisoners? Or Foucault’s,” Foucault Studies 5 (2008): 27.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    Foucault, “Prisons et révoltes dans les prisons” (1973), FDE1, no. 125, 1297.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    See Sharon Shalev, Supermax: Controlling Risk through Solitary Confinement (New York: Willan, 2009) and Lisa Guenther, Solitary Confinement: Social Death and Its Afterlives (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2013).Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    Foucault and Pierre Vidal-Naquet, “Enquête sur les prisons: brisons les barreaux du silence” (1971), FDE1, no. 88, 1049.Google Scholar
  16. 22.
    Daniel Defert, “Sur quoi repose le système pénitentiaire” (1971), FGIP-AL, 127.Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    GIP, “Préface” to Intolerable 1 (1971), FDE1, no. 91, 1065.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    Foucault, “Le Discours de Toul” (1972), FGIP-AL, 167.Google Scholar
  19. 28.
    Francois Colcombet, Foucault, and Antoine Lazarus, “Luttes autour des prisons” (1979), FDE2, no. 273, 811.Google Scholar
  20. 29.
  21. 30.
    Foucault, “Préface” to De la Prison à la Révolte (1973), FDE1, no. 116, 1265.Google Scholar
  22. 31.
    Serge Livrozet, De la Prison à la Révolte (1973; Paris: L’Esprit Frappeur, 1999). Livrozet was a former prisoner, GIP activist, and a founding member of the CAP.Google Scholar
  23. 35.
    Wendy Brown, Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  24. 36.
    Ibid., 43.Google Scholar
  25. 38.
    Giovanna Borradori, Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), 16.Google Scholar
  26. 40.
    See Didier Eribon, Michel Foucault (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991), 234.Google Scholar
  27. 41.
    Anne Guérin, Prisonniers en révolte: Quotidien carcéral, mutineries et politique pénitentiaire en France, 1970–1980 (Marseille: Agone, 2013), 40–41.Google Scholar
  28. 42.
    Ibid., 96.Google Scholar
  29. 43.
    Ibid., 41.Google Scholar
  30. 44.
    Audrey Kiefer, Michel Foucault: Le GIP, l’histoire et l’action, 91–92. Cp. Guérin, Prisonniers en révolte, 101, and Loic Delbaere, “La plate-forme des revendications du CAP,” Le système pénitentiaire à travers les luttes des détenus de 1970 à 1987 (Universitéde Haute Bretagne, Rennes II, 2001–2002), 3.2.2.1. These demands were addressed incrementally across the first nine issues of Le Journal du CAP.Google Scholar
  31. 45.
    Michelle Perrot, Les ombres de l’histoire: Crime et châtiment au XIXiemesiècle (Paris: Flammarion, 2001), 34.Google Scholar
  32. 49.
    Philippe Artières and Mathieu Potte-Bonneville, “Avant-propos,” in D’Aprés Foucault: Gestes, Luttes, Programmes (Paris: Les Prairies ordinaries, 2007), 9 and 23.Google Scholar
  33. 54.
    Foucault, “Sur la sellette” (1975), FDE1, no. 152, 1593.Google Scholar
  34. 55.
    Defert, “L’émergence d’un nouveau front: les prisons,” 323 and 326. For more on the question of women in French prisons at the time, see Guérin, “Et les femmes?” Prisonniers en révolte, 301–329. See also the book by FHAR leader, Guy Hocquenghem, titled Homosexual Desire (1972; Durham: Duke University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  35. 56.
    Artières, “Un instrument en héritage,” 340. For more information, see La France en guerre, 1954–1962: Expèriences métropolitaines de la guerre d’indépendence algérienne, ed. Raphaëlle Branche and Sylvie Thénault (Paris: Autrement, 2008).Google Scholar
  36. 57.
    Brady Heiner, “Foucault and the Black Panthers,” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 11.3 (2007): 313–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 59.
    Steve Champion, Dead to Deliverance: A Death Row Memoir (Vestal: Split Oak Press, 2010), 11 and 48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Perry Zurn 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Perry Zurn

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations