Methodological practice and policy for organisationally and socially relevant IS research: an inclusive-exclusive perspective
In this research paper, we argue that the tendency of Information Systems (IS) researchers to work with a rather parsimonious set of research methods, notably those that follow the positivist tradition, demonstrates a significant degree of methodological exclusiveness. We contend that such an exclusive practice is both counterproductive to good IS research and unethical. Further, it severely and unreasonably limits the extent to which IS research and researchers can contribute to both pressing organisational problems and the scholarly literature. We synthesise our position in a set of four arguments that guide our discussion of the nature and consequences of methodological exclusiveness, as well as possible solutions. We end the paper with an exposition of steps that could be taken to address the current situation.
Keywordsepistemology methods rigour relevance inclusiveness exclusiveness
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baskerville, R. (1999). Investigating Information Systems with Action Research, Communications of the AIS 2(19): 1–32.Google Scholar
- Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G. and Ou, C.X.J. (2010). Knowledge Sharing in Professional Services Firms in China, in M.C. Lacity, L.P. Willcocks, and Y.Q. Zheng (eds.) China’s Emerging Outsourcing Capabilities: The services challenge London & New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, Chapter 7, pp. 165–183.Google Scholar
- Galliers, R.D. (1991). Choosing information systems research approaches, in R.D. Galliers (ed.) Information Systems Research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines, Henley-on-Thames, UK: Alfred Waller, pp. 144–162.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard — Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review 70(1): 71–79.Google Scholar
- Lee, A.S. and Dennis, A.R. (2012). A Hermeneutic Interpretation of a Controlled Laboratory Experiment: A case study of decision making with a group support system, Information Systems Journal, doi:10.1111/j.1365–2575.2010.00365.x.Google Scholar
- Myers, M.D. (1999). Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research, Communications of the AIS 2(23): 1–19.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (2000). Social Exclusion: Concept, applications, and scrutiny, Social Development Papers No. 1, Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
- Zmud, R. (1996). Editor’s Comments: On rigor and relevancy, MIS Quarterly 20(3): xxxvii–xxxviii.Google Scholar