Skip to main content

The Systems Model of Creativity

  • Chapter
The Creative System in Action

Abstract

The previous chapter demonstrates the importance of a systems approach to understanding creativity and gives a brief overview of the literature. This chapter describes and analyses the systems model of creativity developed by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1988, 1990, 1994, 1997, 2003) and provides context for the analyses of creative systems in Part II. What is clear from the previous chapter is a gradual movement in thinking away from a focus on the individual towards confluence or systems approaches to creativity. With one or two notable exceptions, pre-twentieth-century ideas concentrate on creativity as divinely inspired, as the product of an extraordinary individual or genius or as a symptom of mental illness. These ideas were criticized in the twentieth century within the discipline of psychology, and others, as attempts were made to make creativity the subject of scientific study. Working under many of the same assumptions as those they criticized, this intensive period of research did little to alter the fundamental belief that creativity is located in the individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle (1928) Metaphysics, trans. W. D. Ross, in W. D. Ross (ed.) The Oxford Translation of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), pp. 791–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailin, S. (1988) Achieving Extraordinary Ends: An Essay on Creativity (Dordrecht: Kluwer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. (2004) The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Richard Nice (Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice, trans. Richard Nice (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996) The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, trans. S. Emanuel (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Briskman, L. (1980) ‘Creative Product and Creative Process in Science and Art’, Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 23(1), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988) ‘Society, Culture and Person: A Systems View of Creativity’, in R. Sternberg (ed.) The Nature of Creativity (Cambridge University Press), pp. 325–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990) ‘The Domain of Creativity’, in M. A. Runco and R. S. Albert (eds) Theories of Creativity (London: Sage), pp. 190–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994) ‘The Domain of Creativity’, in D. H. Feldman, M. Csikszentmihalyi and H. Gardner (eds) Changing the World: A Framework for the Study of Creativity (Westport, CT: Praeger), pp. 135–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997) Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention (New York: HarperCollins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003) ‘Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity’, in R. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press), pp. 313–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014) The Systems Model of Creativity (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R. and Shanock, L. (2003) ‘Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation and Creativity: A Case Study of Conceptual and Methodological Isolation’, Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 121–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993) Creating Minds: An Anatomy of Creativity Seen Through the Lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham and Gandhi (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Damon, W. (2001) Good Work: When Excellence and Ethics Meet (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, C. (1987) ‘Criteria of Creativity’, in D. Dutton and M. Krausz (eds) The Concept of Creativity in Science and Art (Amsterdam: Springer), pp. 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (1993) ‘Editor’s Introduction: Pierre Bourdieu on Art, Literature and Culture’, in P. Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P. (2006) ‘Paul McCartney and the Creation of “Yesterday”: The Systems Model in Operation’, Popular Music, 25(2), 201–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P. (2008) ‘The Systems Model of Creativity: Analyzing the Distribution of Power in the Studio’, paper presented at the 4th Art of Record Production International Conference, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, November: published in Journal of the Art of Record Production, 4: Supplement to ARP08

    Google Scholar 

  • The Peer-Reviewed Proceedings of the 2008 Art of Record Production Conference, www.artofrecordproduction.com/content/view/214/126/.

  • McIntyre, P. (2012) Creativity and Cultural Production: Issues for Media Practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P. (2013) ‘Creativity and Creative Industries: From Romanticism to Idiosyncratic Agency, Social Networks and Knowledge Systems’, in T. Lee, K. Trees and R. Desai (eds) Refereed Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Conference: Global Networks-Global Divides: Bridging New and Traditional Communication Challenges, ISSN 1448–4331, www.anzca.net/conferences/past-conferences/159.html pp. 1–16.

  • McIntyre, P. and McIntyre, E. (2007) ‘Rethinking Creativity and Approaches to Teaching: The Systems Model and Creative Writing’, The International Journal of the Book, 4(3), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Archives (2011) The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010. United Kingdom Government, www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/25/contents, date accessed 4 January 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Archives of Australia (2014) Access to Records under the Archives Act — Fact Sheet 10. Australian Government, www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs10.aspx, date accessed 12 December 2014.

  • Negus, K. and Pickering, M. (2004) Creativity, Communication and Cultural Value (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2012) Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J., Schirato, T. and Danaher, G. (2002) Understanding Bourdieu (Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. (2006) Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts (New York: John Wiley and Sons).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Janet Fulton and Elizabeth Paton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fulton, J., Paton, E. (2016). The Systems Model of Creativity. In: McIntyre, P., Fulton, J., Paton, E. (eds) The Creative System in Action. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509468_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics