Abstract
Graeme Ritchie stated, ‘there is little doubt that the construction of humor is generally regarded as creative … and any general theory of creativity should have something to say about humor’ (2009, p. 71). If we define humour as the ability to perceive or express the intentional or unintentional comic elements of life, and comedy as an intentionally structured cultural product, then any general theory of creativity should have something to say about the creation and performance of comedy rather than of humour in general. To examine the relationship between creativity and comedy, this research project scrutinized the creative structures and processes of an award-winning comedy duo. The duo, called the Atomic Playboy and the Radiation Romeo, perform a vaudevillian ‘Two-Act’ (Cullen 2007, Page 1915). What marks Atomic and Romeo as an unusual case is that they are not human, they are small artificial intelligence (AI) agents — chat-bots.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ALICE AI Foundation, I. (2011) ALICE, ALICE AI Foundation, Inc., http://alicebot.blogspot.com/, date accessed 8 November 2011.
Attardo, S. (1994) Linguistic Theories of Humor (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
Barad, K. (2003) ‘Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–31.
Bergson, H. (1911) Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic (London: Macmillan).
Bergson, H. (1920) Creative Evolution (London: Macmillan).
Binsted, K., Bergen, B., Coulson, S., Nijholt, A., Stock, O., Strapparava, C., Ritchie, G., Manurung, R., Pain, H., Waller, A. and O’Mara, D. (2006) ‘Computational Humor’, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(2), 59–69.
Boden, M. (1994) Dimensions of Creativity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Boden, M. (2004) The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, 2nd edn (London: Routledge).
Bourke, N. and Neilsen, P. (2004) ‘The Problem of the Exegesis in Creative Writing Higher Degrees’, TEXT Special Issue 3, www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue3/bourke.htm.
Bracken, C. C., Jeffres, L. W. and Neuendorf, K. A. (2004) ‘Criticism or Praise? The Impact of Verbal versus Text-Only Computer Feedback on Social Presence, Intrinsic Motivation, and Recall’, CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 349–57.
Callon, M. (2005) ‘Why Virtualism Paves the Way to Political Impotence: A Reply to Daniel Miller’s Critique of The Laws of the Markets’, Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter, 6(2), 3–20.
Christian, B. (2011) The Most Human Human: What Talking with Computers Teaches Us About What It Means to Be Alive (New York: Doubleday).
Clarke, J. (1992) More Great Interviews (Sydney: Allen & Unwin).
Critchley, S. (2002) On Humour: Thinking in Action (New York: Routledge).
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999) ‘Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity’, in R. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press), pp. 313–38.
Cullen, F. (2007) Vaudeville, Old and New: An Encyclopedia of Variety Performers in America (New York: Routledge).
Fleming, V. (dir.) (1939) The Wizard of Oz, Film, USA. Distributed by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis (London: Macmillan).
Giddens, A. (1995) The Constitution of Society (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Joseph, S. (2012a) Funniest Computer Ever Competition, Hawaii Pacific University, http://funniestcomputer.neurogrid.com/home, date accessed 1 November 2012.
Joseph, S. (2012b) Funniest Computer Ever Competition — 2012 Results, Hawaii Pacific University, http://funniestcomputer.neurogrid.com/2012-competition, date accessed 24 March 2013.
Joseph, S. (2013) Funniest Computer Ever Competition — 2013 Results, Hawaii Pacific University, http://funniestcomputer.neurogrid.com/2013-contest, date accessed 20 January 2014.
Kirakowski, J., O’Donnell, P. and Yiu, A. (2009) ‘Establishing the Hallmarks of a Convincing Chatbot-Human Dialogue’, in I. Maurtua (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction (Croatia: InTech).
Koestler, A. (1975) The Ghost in the Machine (London: Pan Books).
Koprince, S. F. (2002) Understanding Neil Simon (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press).
Loebner, H. (2013) Loebner Prize, www.loebner.net/Prizef/loebner-prize.html, date accessed 20 January 2014.
McIntyre, P. (2012) Creativity and Cultural Production: Issues for Media Practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Meany, M. M. and Clark, T. (2012) ‘Chat-bot Humour: A Survey of Methodological Approaches for a Creative New Media Project’, The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 8, 23–32.
Meany, M. M., Clark, T. and Joseph, S. (2014a) ‘Comedy and Artificial Intelligence: Do We Laugh When a Thing Gives the Impression of Being a Person?’, The International Journal of New Media, Technology and the Arts, 8(2), 21–34.
Meany, M. M., Clark, T. and Laineste, L. (2014b) ‘Comedy, Creativity, and Culture: A Metamodern Perspective’, The International Journal of Literary Humanities, 11(4), 1–15.
Morreall, J. (2009) Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell).
Orlikowski, W. J. (2010) ‘The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125–41.
Orlikowski, W. J. and Scott, S. V. (2008) ‘Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization’, The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–74.
Page, B. (1915) Writing for Vaudeville (Springfield, MA: The Home Correspondence School).
Raskin, V. (2008) The Primer of Humor Research (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996) The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places (Cambridge University Press).
Ritchie, G. (2004) The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes (London and New York: Routledge).
Ritchie, G. (2009) ‘Can Computers Create Humor?’, AI Magazine, 30(3), 71–81.
Sawyer, R. K. (1999) ‘The Emergence of Creativity’, Philosophical Psychology, 12(4), 447–69.
Saygin, A. P., Ciciekli, I. and Akman, V. (2000) ‘Turing Test: 50 Years Later’, Minds and Machines, 10(4), 463–518.
Shechtman, N. and Horowitz, L. M. (2003) ‘Media Inequality in Conversation: How People Behave Differently when Interacting with Computers and People’, in proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, pp. 281–8. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=642661.
Suchman, L. (2007) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (Cambridge University Press).
Turing, A. M. (1950) ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Mind, 59(236), 433–60.
Vorhaus, J. (1994) The Comic Toolbox: How to be Funny Even if You’re Not (St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin).
Wallace, R. S. (2003) Elements of AIML Style (San Francisco: The ALICE Artificial Intelligence Foundation, Inc.). www.alicebot.org/style.pdf.
Wallace, R. S. (2008) PNAMBIC, The ALICE Artificial Intelligence Foundation, www.alicebot.org/articles/wallace/pnambic.html, date accessed 13 July 2011.
Weizenbaum, J. (1966) ‘ELIZA — A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine’, Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36–45.
Willis, E. E. (2005) How to be Funny on Purpose (Toronto: Cybercom Publishing).
Wittgenstein, L. (1976) Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Michael Meany
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meany, M. (2016). Comedy, Creativity, Agency: The Hybrid Individual. In: McIntyre, P., Fulton, J., Paton, E. (eds) The Creative System in Action. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509468_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509468_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50945-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50946-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)