Skip to main content

The Many Frames of the Precarious Condition. Some Insights from Italian Mobilizations against Precarity

  • Chapter
The New Social Division

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

Abstract

This chapter analyses the different frames that emerged during the mobilizations of precarious workers that occurred in Italy in the early 2000s, involving hundreds of thousands of protesters all over the country. In the past, workers’ movements had been rather homogeneous, representing workers who experienced very similar working and living conditions. In this sense, it was possible to speak about a rather homogeneous working class that developed mostly in the urban environment, around factories whose workers shared similar visions about themselves and their role in society. In advanced capitalistic societies, workers’ movements progressively lost their centrality in the struggles towards a more just society. At the same time, the trade unions, the institutional political actors that once represented them — also an outcome of workers’ movements — severely shrank in membership, with union density collapsing in the last decades. Workers, though, did not disappear from contentious politics. And neither did workers’ organizations, broadly conceived. Rather, they changed the way in which they engaged in protests, the organizational forms they selected to mobilize, and the discourses they elaborated around labour issues. This happened also because, despite the relevant heritage of unionism for workers, the very structure of the labour market changed dramatically in the past few decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • A. Aringoli, G. Calella, D. Corradi, C. Giardullo, L. Gori, A. Montefusco, and T. Montella (2006) Studiare con lentezza. L’università, la precarietà e il ritorno delle rivolte studentesche (Roma: Edizioni Alegre).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Bateson (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind (New York: Ballantine Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Beck (2000) The Brave New World of Work (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Benford and D. A. Snow (2000) ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Boltanski and F. Chiapello (1999) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme (Paris: Gallimard).

    Google Scholar 

  • ChainWorkers (2001) Mayday 2001 call for action, http://www.ecn.org/chainworkers/chainw/mayday/mayday.html, date accessed 2 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChainWorkers (2002) Mayday 2002 call for action, http://web.archive.org/web/20021006022442/ http://www.chainworkers.org/chainw/md2002/index.htm, date accessed 2 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChainWorkers (2003) Mayday 2003 call for action, http://web.archive.org/web/20030626225351/ http://www.chainworkers.org/chainw/mayday/mayday.html, date accessed 2 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Chun (2009) Organizing at the Margins: The Symbolic Politics of Labor in South Korea and the United States (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. L. Epstein (1991) Political Protest and Cultural Revolution: Nonviolent Direct Action in the 1970s and 1980s (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroMayDay (2004) Euromayday 2004 call for action, http://web.archive.org/web/20040607035704/ http://www.euromayday.org/lang_eng.html, last accessed 2 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroMayDay (2005) Euromayday 2005 call for action, http://web.archive.org/web/20050419011856/ http://www.euromayday.org/, last accessed 2 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Fraser (2003) ‘Rethinking Recognition: Overcoming Displacement and Reification in Cultural Politics’, in B. Hobson (ed.), Recognition Struggles and Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. A. Gamson (1992) Talking Politics (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gerhards and D. Rucht (1992) ‘Mesomobilization: Organizing and Framing in Two Protest Campaigns in West Germany’, American Journal of Sociology, 98 (3), 555–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Goffman (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Garden City, NY: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Goffman (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Grispini (2006) 1977 (Roma: Manifestolibri).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Häusermann and H. Schwander (2012) ‘Varieties of Dualization? Labor Market Segmentation and Insider-Outsider Divides across Regimes’, in P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier and M. Seeleib-Kaiser (eds), The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies (Oxford, UK and Malden, MA: Oxford University Press), pp. 27–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • B. Hobson (2003) Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Honneth (2001) ‘Recognition or Redistribution?: Changing Perspectives on the Moral Order of Society’, Theory, Culture & Society, 18 (2–3), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Hunt and R. D. Benford (1994) ‘Identity Talk in the Peace and Justice Movement’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 488–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. L. Kalleberg (2009) ‘Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition’, American Sociological Review, 74 (1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Mattoni (2012) Media Practices and Protest Politics. How Precarious Workers Mobilise (Farnham, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Melucci (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D. Papadopoulos, N. Stephenson and V. Tsianos (2008) Escape Routes. Control and Subversion in the 21st Century (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Polletta (2002) Freedom is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Precari Atesia (2006) Verbale Ispettorato Lavoro, http://precariatesia.altervista.org/main.php, last accessed 2 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Rizza (2000) ‘Trasformazioni del lavoro, nuove forme di precarizzazione lavorativa e politiche di welfare: alcune riflessioni preliminari’, in R. Rizza (ed.), Politiche del Lavoro e Nuove Forme di Precarizzazione Lavorativa (Milano: Franco Angeli), pp. 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. G. Runciman (1972) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Snow and R. D. Benford (1992) ‘Master Frames and Cycles of Protest’, in A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller (eds), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press), pp. 133–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Snow, E. B. Rochford, S. K. Worden and R. D. Benford (1986) ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation’, American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Standing (1999) Global Labour Flexibility. Seeking Distributive Justice (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Alice Mattoni

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mattoni, A. (2015). The Many Frames of the Precarious Condition. Some Insights from Italian Mobilizations against Precarity. In: della Porta, D., Hänninen, S., Siisiäinen, M., Silvasti, T. (eds) The New Social Division. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509352_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics