The Many Frames of the Precarious Condition. Some Insights from Italian Mobilizations against Precarity

  • Alice Mattoni
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)


This chapter analyses the different frames that emerged during the mobilizations of precarious workers that occurred in Italy in the early 2000s, involving hundreds of thousands of protesters all over the country. In the past, workers’ movements had been rather homogeneous, representing workers who experienced very similar working and living conditions. In this sense, it was possible to speak about a rather homogeneous working class that developed mostly in the urban environment, around factories whose workers shared similar visions about themselves and their role in society. In advanced capitalistic societies, workers’ movements progressively lost their centrality in the struggles towards a more just society. At the same time, the trade unions, the institutional political actors that once represented them — also an outcome of workers’ movements — severely shrank in membership, with union density collapsing in the last decades. Workers, though, did not disappear from contentious politics. And neither did workers’ organizations, broadly conceived. Rather, they changed the way in which they engaged in protests, the organizational forms they selected to mobilize, and the discourses they elaborated around labour issues. This happened also because, despite the relevant heritage of unionism for workers, the very structure of the labour market changed dramatically in the past few decades.


Labour Market Social Movement Precarious Worker Social Division Symbolic Level 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. A. Aringoli, G. Calella, D. Corradi, C. Giardullo, L. Gori, A. Montefusco, and T. Montella (2006) Studiare con lentezza. L’università, la precarietà e il ritorno delle rivolte studentesche (Roma: Edizioni Alegre).Google Scholar
  2. G. Bateson (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind (New York: Ballantine Books).Google Scholar
  3. U. Beck (2000) The Brave New World of Work (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  4. R. D. Benford and D. A. Snow (2000) ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Boltanski and F. Chiapello (1999) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme (Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
  6. ChainWorkers (2001) Mayday 2001 call for action,, date accessed 2 March 2015.Google Scholar
  7. ChainWorkers (2002) Mayday 2002 call for action,, date accessed 2 March 2015.Google Scholar
  8. ChainWorkers (2003) Mayday 2003 call for action,, date accessed 2 March 2015.Google Scholar
  9. J. J. Chun (2009) Organizing at the Margins: The Symbolic Politics of Labor in South Korea and the United States (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  10. B. L. Epstein (1991) Political Protest and Cultural Revolution: Nonviolent Direct Action in the 1970s and 1980s (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  11. EuroMayDay (2004) Euromayday 2004 call for action,, last accessed 2 March 2015.Google Scholar
  12. EuroMayDay (2005) Euromayday 2005 call for action,, last accessed 2 March 2015.Google Scholar
  13. N. Fraser (2003) ‘Rethinking Recognition: Overcoming Displacement and Reification in Cultural Politics’, in B. Hobson (ed.), Recognition Struggles and Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 21–34.Google Scholar
  14. W. A. Gamson (1992) Talking Politics (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  15. J. Gerhards and D. Rucht (1992) ‘Mesomobilization: Organizing and Framing in Two Protest Campaigns in West Germany’, American Journal of Sociology, 98 (3), 555–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. E. Goffman (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Garden City, NY: Doubleday).Google Scholar
  17. E. Goffman (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  18. M. Grispini (2006) 1977 (Roma: Manifestolibri).Google Scholar
  19. S. Häusermann and H. Schwander (2012) ‘Varieties of Dualization? Labor Market Segmentation and Insider-Outsider Divides across Regimes’, in P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier and M. Seeleib-Kaiser (eds), The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies (Oxford, UK and Malden, MA: Oxford University Press), pp. 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. B. Hobson (2003) Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  21. A. Honneth (2001) ‘Recognition or Redistribution?: Changing Perspectives on the Moral Order of Society’, Theory, Culture & Society, 18 (2–3), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. S. A. Hunt and R. D. Benford (1994) ‘Identity Talk in the Peace and Justice Movement’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 488–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. A. L. Kalleberg (2009) ‘Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition’, American Sociological Review, 74 (1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Mattoni (2012) Media Practices and Protest Politics. How Precarious Workers Mobilise (Farnham, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  25. A. Melucci (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. D. Papadopoulos, N. Stephenson and V. Tsianos (2008) Escape Routes. Control and Subversion in the 21st Century (London: Pluto Press).Google Scholar
  27. F. Polletta (2002) Freedom is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Precari Atesia (2006) Verbale Ispettorato Lavoro,, last accessed 2 March 2015.Google Scholar
  29. R. Rizza (2000) ‘Trasformazioni del lavoro, nuove forme di precarizzazione lavorativa e politiche di welfare: alcune riflessioni preliminari’, in R. Rizza (ed.), Politiche del Lavoro e Nuove Forme di Precarizzazione Lavorativa (Milano: Franco Angeli), pp. 13–27.Google Scholar
  30. W. G. Runciman (1972) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  31. D. A. Snow and R. D. Benford (1992) ‘Master Frames and Cycles of Protest’, in A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller (eds), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press), pp. 133–155.Google Scholar
  32. D. A. Snow, E. B. Rochford, S. K. Worden and R. D. Benford (1986) ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation’, American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. G. Standing (1999) Global Labour Flexibility. Seeking Distributive Justice (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Alice Mattoni 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice Mattoni

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations