Abstract
So far our philological analysis of the term ‘talent’ has revealed a fundamental change in the semantics of the term, and later, a profound effect on the developing semantics of ‘talent management’. This has primarily been a change from a limited denotative meaning, by means of which ‘talent’ referred to a coin in actual everyday usage, to multiple connotative meanings picking out abilities and mental endowments, or some related but poorly defined phenomenon. Now, in analytic philosophy, this transformation in the word’s meaning is not just a semantic issue; or, rather, semantic issues sometimes have non-trivial significance. Here, they pertain to issues around how the word relates to, and is a useful (or non-useful) part of, our concrete, goal-oriented daily activities. In this chapter, I pursue that line of thinking, exploring the historical developments in the use and meanings of ‘talent’ from a philosophical perspective based on the work of Saul Kripke, in order to give a clearer sense of how the basic nature of the term has shifted and how this can, in theory, have significant consequences for how the term can be used to causally interact with the world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2016 Billy Adamsen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adamsen, B. (2016). ‘Talent’ and ‘Talent Management’ as Accidental Designators or Empty Signifiers. In: Demystifying Talent Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508676_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508676_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55824-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50867-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)