Negotiating Positionality in Ethnographic Investigations of Workplace Settings: Student, Consultant or Confidante?

  • Dorte Lønsmann
Part of the Communicating in Professions and Organizations book series (PSPOD)

Abstract

“All researchers are positioned whether they write about it explicitly, separately, or not at all” (Chiseri-Strater, 1996, 115). Ethnographic researchers are not supposed to be neutral observers, but are very much part of the research process. As such, the ethnographer herself becomes part of the data collection process, and the relationship between researcher and informants becomes a part of the process as well. This means that we as researchers need to reflect on the research process, including our own position as researchers. One reason why this is important is because our way of positioning ourselves as researchers influences what we have access to. As Chiseri-Strater puts it: “Ethnographies that omit the methodology of doing fieldwork disappoint me, because this information can reveal what a researcher was positioned to see, to know, and to understand” (123). In other words, what we see — or what we are allowed to see — depends on where we stand and who we are in that moment. By reflecting on this positioning in our work, we are providing important contextual information on the status and value of our research.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. ( London: SAGE).Google Scholar
  2. Bamberg, M., De Fina, A. & Schiffrin, D. (2011). Discourse and identity construction. In Schwartz, S.J., Koen, L. & Vignoles, V. L. (Eds), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. ( Berlin/New York: Springer ).Google Scholar
  3. Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7 (4–5), 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiseri-Strater, E. (1996). Turning in upon ourselves: Positionality, subjectivity and reflexivity in case study and ethnographic research. In Mortensen, P., & Kirsch, G. (Eds), Ethics and Representation in Qualitative Studies of Literacy. (National Council of Teachers of English).Google Scholar
  5. Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies. ( Malmö: Liber).Google Scholar
  6. Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Fina, A. (2011). “We are not there. In fact now we will go to the garden to take the rain”: Researcher identity and the Observer’s Paradox. In Angouri, J. & Marra, M. (Eds), Constructing Identities at Work. (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  8. Gaztambide-Fernández, R.A. & Howard, A. (2012). Access, status, and representation: Some reflections from two ethnographic studies of elite schools. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 43 (3), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gumperz, J.J. (1999). On interactional sociolinguistic method. In Sarangi, S. & Roberts, C. (Eds), Talk, Work and Institutional Order. ( Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter ).Google Scholar
  10. Hertz, R. & Imber, J.B. (Eds) (1995). A SAGE Focus Edition: Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods. ( Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE ).Google Scholar
  11. Huisman, K. (2008). “Does this mean you’re not going to come visit me anymore?”: An inquiry into an ethics of reciprocity and positionality in feminist ethnographic research. Sociological Inquiry 78(3), 372–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Merriam, S.B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M.Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G. & Muhamad, M. (2001). Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education 20 (5), 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mullings, B. (1999). Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum, 30, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sabot, E.C. (1999). Dr Jekyl, Mr H(i)de: The contrasting face of elites at interview. Geoforum, 30, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith, K.E. (2006). Problematizing power relations in “elite” interviews, Geoforum 37, 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spradley, J. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. ( Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).Google Scholar
  17. Thomas, R.J. (1995). Interviewing important people in big companies in Hertz, R. & Imber, J. B. (Eds), A SAGE Focus Edition: Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods. ( Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE).Google Scholar
  18. Welch, C., Marschan-Piekkari, R., Penttinen, H., & Tahvanainen, M. (2002). Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research. International Business Review 11, 611–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dorte Lønsmann 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorte Lønsmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations