From Business Letters to Emails: How Practitioners Can Shape Their Own Forms of Communication More Efficiently

  • Franca Poppi
Part of the Communicating in Professions and Organizations book series (PSPOD)

Abstract

The last few years have witnessed dramatic changes in technology, which, in turn, have permanently altered the way information and expertise are disseminated. Nowadays people and organizations around the world are connected to other people and organizations by means of electronic media, which create the necessary conditions for a rapid sharing of knowledge and information. While in the past knowledge itself was considered to be synonymous with power, in the 21st-century it is rather the quick and efficient retrieval and exchange of knowledge and information that provides parties with an edge in transactions, especially those of a business nature.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashley, A. (2003). Oxford Handbook of Commercial Correspondence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Askehave, I. & Ellerup Nielsen, A. (2005). Digital genres: a Challenge to Traditional Genre Theory. Information Tecnhology & People 18 /2, 120–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (Ed) (2009). The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, N. (2001). Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where it’s Heading. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bhatia, V.K. (2002). Applied Genre Analysis: A Multi-perspective Model. Ibérica 4, 3–19.Google Scholar
  6. Bhatia, V.K. (2005). Interdiscursivity in Business Letters. In Gillaerts, P. & Gotti, M. (eds) Genre Variation in Business Letters. Bern: Peter Lang, 31–54.Google Scholar
  7. Bondi, M. (2005). People in Business: The Representation of self and multiple identities in business e-mails. In In Gillaerts, P. & Gotti, M. (Eds), Genre Variation in Business Letters. Bern: Peter Lang, 303–324.Google Scholar
  8. Bovée, C.L., Thill, J.V., & Schatzman, B.E. (2003). Business Communication Today. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crowston, K. & Williams, M. (2000). Reproduced and Emergent Genres of CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  11. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Del Lungo, C. G. (2005). “I perceive, my dear friend, by your letter of the 20th inst. That you are decided on entering upon the career of commerce”: Nineteenth Century Business Correspondence. In Gillaerts, P. & Gotti, M. (Eds), Genre Variation in Business Letters. Bern: Peter Lang, 125–146.Google Scholar
  13. Gillaerts, P.& Gotti, M. (2005). Introduction. In Gillaerts, P. & Gotti, M. (Eds), Genre Variation in Business Letters. Bern: Peter Lang, 9–28.Google Scholar
  14. Gimenez, J.C. (2005). Unpacking Business Emails: Message Embeddedness in International Business Email Communication. In Gillaerts, P. & Gotti, M. (Eds), Genre Variation in Business Letters. Bern: Peter Lang, 235–255.Google Scholar
  15. Gotti, M., Berkenkotter, C., & Bhatia, V.K. (2012). Introduction. In Berkenkotter, C., Bhatia, V. K. & Gotti, M. (Eds), Insights into Academic Genres. Bern: Peter Lang, 11–45.Google Scholar
  16. Hymes, D. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (Eds), Sociolinguistics. Baltimore, USA: Penguin Education, Penguin, 269–293.Google Scholar
  17. Kankaanranta, A. (2005). “Hej Seppo, could you pls comment on this!”–Internal Email Communication in Lingua Franca English in a Multinational Company. Jyväskylä: Centre for Applied Language Studies,University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  18. Kankaanranta, A. & Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2013). “What language does global business speak?”–The concept and development of BELF. Ibérica 26, 17–34.Google Scholar
  19. Korzenny, F. (1978). A theory of electronic propinquity: Mediated communication in organizations. Communication Research 5, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lightfoot, J.M. (2006). A Comparative Analysis of E-mail and Face-to-Face Communication in an Educational Environment. Internet and Higher Education 9, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Locker, K. (1998). Business and Administrative Communication. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Louhiala-Salminen, L. & Kankaanranta, A. (2005). “Hello Monica, Kindly Change your Arrangements”: Business Genres in a State of Flux. In Gillaerts, P. & Gotti, M. (Eds), Genre Variation in Business Letters. Bern: Peter Lang, 55–84.Google Scholar
  23. Louhiala-Salminen, L. & Kankaanranta, A. (2011). Professional Communication in a Global Business Context: The Notion of Global Communicative Competence. IEE Transactions on Professional Communication 54 /3, 244–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mallon, R. & Oppenheim, C. (2002). Style used in Electronic Mail. Aslib Proceedings 54 /1, 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller, C.R. (1984). Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Munter, M.M. (2003). Guide to Managerial Communication. Effective Business Writing and Speaking. Upper Saddle River: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  27. Murphy, M. & Levy, M. (2006). Politeness in Intercultural Email Communication: Australian and Korean Perspectives. Journal of Intercultural Communication 12, 1–13Google Scholar
  28. Orlikowski, W.J. & Yates, J. (1994). Genre Repertoire: the Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 39, 542–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pérez Sabater, C., Turney, E. & Montero Fleta, M.B. (2008). Orality and Literacy, Formality and Informality in Email Communication. I bérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE) 15, 71–88.Google Scholar
  30. Peterwagner, R. (2005). What is the Matter with Communicative Competence? An Analysis to Encourage Teachers of English to Assess the Very Basis of their Teaching. Wien: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural Diversity and Information and Communication Technology Impact on Global Virtual Teams: An Exploratory Study. Information and Management 45 /2, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. The Radicati Group (2001). Email Statistics Report 2013–2017–Executive Summary. Accessed in June (2014) from: http://www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Email-Statistics-Report-2013–2017-Executive-Summary.pdf
  34. Yates, J. & Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach Studying Communication and Media. The Academy of Management Review 17 /2, 299–326.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Franca Poppi 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franca Poppi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations