Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Go to cart
Book cover

New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research pp 89–106Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan
  1. Home
  2. New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research
  3. Chapter
Social Innovation: Redesigning the Welfare Diamond

Social Innovation: Redesigning the Welfare Diamond

  • Jane Jenson 
  • Chapter
  • Open Access
  • First Online: 27 January 2016
  • 16k Accesses

  • 23 Citations

Abstract

Decades of neoliberal economics and politics have resulted in major shifts in much of the world in the ways that policy and research communities now understand, shape and work to organise relations between civil society and the state and within civil society itself. Over the last fifteen years, as neoliberalism clearly revealed its limits, these communities began to deploy a range of new or reworked concepts to address ongoing challenges. Social innovation is one. Social cohesion, social inclusion and social investment are three other examples.

Keywords

  • Labour Market
  • Civil Society
  • Social Cohesion
  • Social Enterprise
  • Social Inclusion

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Download chapter PDF

References

  • Bartsch, R. (2002) ‘Generating Polysemy: Metaphor and Metonymy’, in Dirven, R. and Pörings, R., Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, P. (1999) ‘La cohésion sociale: Critique dialectique d’un quasi-concept’, Lien social et Politiques, 41: 47–59.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist, P. (2004) ‘The Choice Revolution: Privatization of Swedish Welfare Services in the 1990s’, Social Policy & Administration, 38 (2): 139–55.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (eds) (2012) The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, M.J. (2012) ‘Social Innovation, an Analytical Grid for Understanding the Social Economy: The Example of the Québec Housing Sector’, Service Business, 6: 47–59.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, B. (2011) ‘The Paradox of the Social Investment State: Growth, Employment and Poverty in the Lisbon Era’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21 (5): 432–49.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Capacity (2008) Social Enterprise: A childcare solution for London? Available at http://www.capacityltd.org.uk/docs/Social_Enterprise_Report.pdf [Accessed 22 October 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulier-Grice, J., Davies, A., Patrick, R. and Norman, W. (2012) Defining Social Innovation. A deliverable of the project: ‘The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe’ (TEPSIE), Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrowolsky, A. and Jenson, J. (2005) ‘Social Investment Perspectives and Practices: A Decade in British Politics’, in Powell, M., Bauld, L. and Clarke, K. (eds), Social Policy Review, 17. Bristol: Policy Press at the University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duane-Richard, A. and Mahon, R. (2001) ‘Sweden: Models in Crisis’, in Jenson, J. and Sineau, M. (eds), Who Cares? Women’s Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesigns. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C. and Frattini, T. (2011) ‘Immigration. The European Experience’. Centro Studi Luca d’Agliano Development Studies Working Paper No. 326. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2023575 [Accessed 27 November 2014.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A. and Myles, J. (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011a) An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies up to 2020, COM(2011) 173 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011b) (nd) The Social Business Initiative. Promoting Social Investment Funds. Staff Working Paper. Brussels: DG Internal Market and Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) (nd) The Social Business Initiative of the European Commission. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013) Social Innovation Research in the European Union. Approaches, Findings and Future Directions. Policy Review. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. and Guillemard, A-M. (eds) (2012) Social Policy and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., Ewert, B. And Brandsen, T. (eds) (2014) Social Innovations for Social Cohesion. Transnational Patterns and Approaches from 20 European Cities. Available at http://www.wilcoproject.eu/downloads/WILCO-project-eReader. pdf [Accessed 3 November 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., Pilj, M. and Ungerson, C. (eds) (1994) Payments for Care. A Comparative Overview. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., Gutiérrez, R. and Peña-Casas, R. (eds) (2011) Working Poverty in Europe: A Comparative Approach. Work and Welfare in Europe Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geobey, A., Westley, F. and Weber, O. (2012) ‘Enabling Social Innovation through Developmental Social Finance’, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3 (2): 151–65.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way. The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and Lamont, M. (eds) (2013) Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO [International Labour Organization] (2011) A Social Protection Floor for a Fair and Inclusive Globalization. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J. (2010a) Defining and Measuring Social Cohesion. London & Geneva: Commonwealth Secretariat & UNRISD.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J. (2010b) ‘Diffusing I deas after Neo-liberalism: The Social Investment Perspective in Europe and Latin America’, Global Social Policy, 10 (1): 59–84.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J. (2012) ‘A New Politics for the Social Investment Perspective: Objectives, Instruments and Areas of Intervention in Welfare Regimes’, in Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (eds), The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, B.M. (2007) The Politics of Pre-School: Intentions and Decisions Underlying the Emergence and Growth of the Swedish Pre-School. 3rd Edition. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvist, J. (2013) ‘The Post-Crisis European Social Model: Developing or Dismantling Social Investments?’ Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 29 (1): 91–107.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2005) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, F. and Fernandez, H. (2012) Scaling Up Social Enterprise: Strategies Taken from Early Years Providers. Working paper 79. Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, R. and McBride, S. (2008) The OECD and Transnational Governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (2006) ‘The Diffusion of Ideas in Development Theory and Policy’, Global Social Policy, 6 (3): 334–54.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E. and González, S. (eds) (2010) Can Neighbourhoods Save the City? Community Development and Social Innovation. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2012) ‘Postscript: The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship; Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre-paradigmatic Field’, in Gidron, B. and Hasenfeld, Y. (eds), Social Enterprises. An Organizational Perspective. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 222–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. and Murdock, A. (eds) (2012) Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noya, A. (2011) ‘Presentation’, at the International Conference on Challenge Social Innovation. Innovating Innovation by Research. Vienna, 19–21 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1996) Local Partnerships and Social Innovation. Ireland. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Local Partnerships for Better Governance. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) Babies and Bosses — Reconciling Work and Family Life. Volume 4. Canada, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) Growing Unequal. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010a) The OECD Innovation Strategy. Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow. Paris: OECD.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010b) SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Paris: OECD.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) Divided We Stand. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014) OECD Family Database. Paris: OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org/social/family/database [Accessed 7 November 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, T. and Schmidpeter, R. (eds) (2013) Social Innovation. Solutions for a Sustainable Future. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. and Sabel, C. (1984) The Second Industrial Divide. Possibilities for Prosperity. NYC: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1983) [1934] The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEL (Social Enterprise London) (2002) Social Enterprise Guide to Childcare. London: SEL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, I. (2005) ‘Social Enterprise and Social Inclusion: Social Enterprises in the Sphere of Work Integration’, International Journal of Public Administration, 28 (9–10): 807–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jane Jenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oxford, UK

    Alex Nicholls (Professor of Social Entrepreneurship) (Professor of Social Entrepreneurship)

  2. The Young Foundation, UK

    Julie Simon (Research Programme Lead) (Research Programme Lead)

  3. Nesta, UK

    Madeleine Gabriel (Principal Researcher) (Principal Researcher)

Rights and permissions

This chapter is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

Copyright information

© 2015 Jane Jenson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jenson, J. (2015). Social Innovation: Redesigning the Welfare Diamond. In: Nicholls, A., Simon, J., Gabriel, M. (eds) New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801_5

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801_5

  • Published: 27 January 2016

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54953-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50680-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • How we use cookies
  • Your privacy choices/Manage cookies
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.