The ‘Rebalance’ and the Dangers of America’s Creeping Containment of China



With its ‘rebalance’ towards the Asia-Pacific region, the United States is in danger of falling into a policy of seeking to contain China’s rise rather than to engage with it constructively. In many ways this is an unconscious hang over from the Cold War era and has been reinforced by the apparent centrality of military and maritime, rather than political and economic expressions of interest in the region. This policy will prove counterproductive and is likely to alarm prospective allies and partners in the region. It will increase tensions and could potentially drag the United States into commitments that are not in its interest.


Strategic Partner ASEAN Regional Forum Security Treaty Security Commitment Maritime Dispute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    On the various military initiatives associated with the rebalance, see Mark E. Manyin, Stephen Daggett, Ben Dolven, Susan V. Lawrence, Michael F. Martin, Ronald O’Rourke, and Bruce Vaughn, ‘Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration’s “Rebalancing” Toward Asia’ Congressional Research Service Report for Congress (7-5700), 28 March 2012, pp. 1–5, 10–16;Google Scholar
  2. Robert S. Ross, ‘The Problem With the Pivot’ Foreign Affairs, 91(6) November/ December 2012, pp. 76–79;Google Scholar
  3. Ankit Panda, ‘US-Philippines Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement Bolsters “Pivot to Asia”’ The Diplomat, 29 April 2014.;Google Scholar
  4. and Ian E. Rinehart, ‘Malaysia: Background and U.S. Relations’ Congressional Research Service Report, 23 May 2014, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    M. Taylor Fravel, ‘U.S. Policy Towards the Disputes in the South China Sea Since 1995’, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Policy Report, March 2014, pp. 6–7. us.policy.scs.pdf.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Eli Ratner, ‘Rebalancing to Asia with an Insecure China’ The Washington Quarterly, 36(2) Spring 2013, p. 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 8.
    Stephen Harner, ‘The NY Times “China Treat” Myth, the “Pivot to Asia” And Obama’s Foreign Policy Legacy’ Forbes, 6 June 2014 Scholar
  8. 9.
    Quoted in Justin Logan, ‘America’s Pivot: One Big Contradiction’ The Diplomat, 25 January 2013. Scholar
  9. 10.
    Harry Harding, A Fragile Relationship: The United States and China since 1972 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1992), pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    see Evan Resnick, ‘Correspondence: Debating British Decisionmaking toward Nazi Germany in the 1930’s’ International Security, 34(1) Summer 2009, pp. 182–188.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    James Mann, About Face: A History of America’s Curious Relationship with China, From Nixon to Bush (New York: Vintage Books, 2000), pp. 13–154.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    On the fundamental contradiction in the US’ post-Cold War hedging strategy towards the PRC, see Justin Logan, ‘China, America, and the Pivot to Asia’ Cato Institute Policy Analysis, (717) 8 January 2013, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    Robert L. Suettinger, Beyond Tiananment: The Politics of U.S.-China Relations, 1989–2000 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    Colonel William Jordan, Lewis M. Stern, and Walter Lohman, ‘Backgrounder – U.S.-Vietnam Defense Relations: Investing in Strategic Alignment’ The Heritage Foundation, (2707) 18 July 2012, pp. 3–4. Scholar
  15. 20.
    David E. Sanger, ‘U.S. Would Defend Taiwan, Bush Says’ New York Times, 26 April 2001. Scholar
  16. 22.
    Quoted in Frederick Z. Brown, ‘Rapprochement between Vietnam and the United States’ Contemporary Southeast Asia, 32(3) 2010, p. 333.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Tomas Lum, ‘U.S.-Cambodia Relations: Issues for the 113th Congress’ Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, 24 July 2013, p. 2.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    Quoted in Demetri Sevastolopoulo, ‘Panetta Makes Symbolic Visit to Vietnam’ Financial Times, 3 June 2012. e98dd6d4-ad6f-11e1-bb8e-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3DTNWNjA0.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    Carlyle A. Tayer, ‘The Tug of War Over Cambodia’ USNI News, 9 February 2013. Scholar
  20. 30.
    Melvyn Lefer, A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992);Google Scholar
  21. John Lewis Gaddis, The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, 1941–1947 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  22. 31.
    Anne Applebaum, Iron Curtain: The Crushing of Eastern Europe, 1944–1956 (New York: Doubleday, 2012).Google Scholar
  23. 32.
    Tomas J. Christensen, ‘Posing Problems Without Catching Up: China’s Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy’ International Security, 25(4) Spring 2001, pp. 5–40;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richard K. Betts and Tomas J. Christensen, ‘China: Getting the Questions Right’ The National Interest, Winter 2000/2001, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
  25. 33.
    Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 34.
    Evan N. Resnick, ‘Dubious Deterrence in the East China Sea’ S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Commentary, 5 June 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Evan N. Resnik 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations