Skip to main content
  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

China and South Korea are trapped in an “Asia’s Paradox” (antagonism despite interdependency) with Japan. The power transition in East Asia, territorial disputes and competing narratives of history have made a genuine reconciliation among these countries very difficult. If top political leaders are unable or unwilling to seek a rapprochement with their neighbors, then civil society (NGOs, scholars, and journalists) in East Asia must continue to nurture people-to-people friendship and understanding, prepare the groundwork of better bottom-up, grassroots ties, and patiently await a new dawn when more conciliatory statesmen appear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Aaron Friedberg, “Will Europe’s Past be Asia’s future?”, in Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 42, No. 3, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See He Yinan “National Mythmaking and the Problems of History in Sino-Japanese Relations”, in Lam Peng Er (ed.), Japan’s Relations with China: Facing a Rising Power (London and New York: Routledge, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sawa Takamitsu wrote: “Abe’s visit to Yasukuni was based on his self confidence in securing the strengthening of the Japan-US alliance thanks to near certainty about the resolution of the Futenma problem. … My guess as to the political intent behind Abe’s Yasukuni visit is his primary aim to further raise tensions in the Japan-China relationship. … Abe’s scenario must have been like this: Heightening Sino-Japanese tensions with his visit to Yasukuni would clear the way for him to follow such steps as approving the exercise of the right to collective self-defense under the existing war-renouncing Constitution and abolishing the three-point weapons-export ban. He would then wait for a right opportunity and move aggressively to amend the Constitution”. See Sawa Takamitsu, “Japan heading for darker days?”, Japan Times, accessed January 22, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a notable effort to analyze Sino-Japanese relations beyond a narrow nationalistic viewpoint by a team of Chinese and Japanese scholars, see Daqing Yang, Jie Liu, Hiroshi Mitani and Andrew Gordon (eds), Toward a History Beyond Borders: Contentious Issues in Sino-Japanese Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gregory Rodgers, “The Hoi An Japanese bridge”, Southeast Asia Travel, available at: http://goseasia.about.com/od/hoi_an_vietnam/a/hoi-an-japanese-bridge.htm, accessed February 13, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Lam Peng Er

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Er, L.P. (2015). Antagonism Despite Interdependency: Whither China-Japan Relations?. In: Togo, K., Naidu, G.V.C. (eds) Building Confidence in East Asia: Maritime Conflicts, Interdependence and Asian Identity Thinking. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137504654_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics