Audience Acceptance in India: Case Studies in New Delhi, Mumbai, and Imphal



By applying the securitization framework in the Indian context, the previous chapter revealed that a full HIV/AIDS securitizing move was generated by the Indian government in 2004. However, as argued in chapter 7, the full securitizing move in 2004 was no longer maintained within the Indian government. In other words, HIV/AIDS was no longer framed as the most serious problem or perceived as a top-priority issue in the national government agenda. In this sense, the HIV/AIDS securitizing move in India existed in the failed rather than in full version.


Public Health Problem Global Fund Indian Government Civil Society Group Moral Support 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Michael C. Williams, “The Continuing Evolution of Securitization Theory,” in Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, ed. Thierry Balzacq (London: Routledge, 2011), 215.Google Scholar
  2. 8.
    Pareena G. Lawrence and Maria C. Brun, “NGOs and HIV/AIDS Advocacy in India: Identifying the Challenges,” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 34, no. 1 (2011): 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 34.
    Sarah Hawkes and K. G. Santhya, “Diverse Realities: Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIV in India,” Sexually Transmitted Infections 78, Supplementary 1 (2002): 32.Google Scholar
  4. 37.
    Niranjan S. Karnik, “Locating HIV/AIDS and India: Cautionary Notes on the Globalization of Categories,” Science, Technology, & Human Values 26, no. 3 (2001): 327.Google Scholar
  5. 40.
    Alexandra L. Hernandez et al., “Sexual Behavior among Men Who Have Sex with Women, Men, and Hijras in Mumbai, India—Multiple Sexual Risks,” AIDS and Behavior 10, Supplementary 1 (2006): 8.Google Scholar
  6. 42.
    Sameer Kumta et al., “Bisexuality, Sexual Risk Taking, and HIV Prevalence among Men Who Have Sex with Men Accessing Voluntary Counseling and Testing Services in Mumbai, India,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 53, no. 2 (2010): 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 55.
    See S. Sarkar et al., “Rapid Spread of HIV among Injecting Drug Users in North-Eastern States of India,” Bulletin on Narcotics 45, no. 1 (1993): 91–105.Google Scholar
  8. 64.
    Mukta Sharma et al., “Five Years of Needle Syringe Exchange in Manipur, India: Program and Contextual Issues,” International Journal of Drug Policy 14, nos. 5–6 (2003): 408.Google Scholar
  9. 106.
    Pradeep Seth, “The Situation of HIV/M. Tuberculosis Co-infection in India,” The Open Infectious Disease Journal 5, Supplementary 1-M5 (2011): 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 115.
    Uma Kapila, Indian Economy: Performance and Policies (New Delhi: Academic Foundation, 2008–2009), 260.Google Scholar
  11. 144.
    Qiu-sha Ma, “Defining Chinese Nongovernmental Organizations,” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 13, no. 2 (2002): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 145.
    Thierry Balzacq, “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context,” European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 2 (2005): 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 146.
    Catherine Boone and Jake Batsell, “Politics and AIDS in Africa: Research Agendas in Political Science and International Relations,” in HIV/AIDS and the Threat to National and International Security, ed. R. L. Ostergard (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 14.Google Scholar
  14. 152.
    Ilavenil Ramiah, “Securitizing the AIDS Issue in Asia,” in Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitization, ed. Mely Caballero-Anthony, Ralf Emmers, and Amitav Acharya (England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2006a), 151.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Catherine Yuk-ping Lo 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations