Skip to main content

The Legal Foundations of Normative Borders and Normative Orders: Individual and Human Rights and the Israel-Palestine-EU Triangle

  • Chapter
Fragmented Borders, Interdependence and External Relations

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

  • 219 Accesses

Abstract

Politics between the EU, on the one hand, and Israel and Palestine, on the other, are not played out in an anarchic space. They are embedded in and constantly have to relate to global societal dynamics that create ‘interlocking patterns of interdependence’ (Del Sarto, Chapter 1, this volume). This article addresses one of these broader dynamics affecting the Israel-Palestine-EU triangle, namely global normative borders/orders shaped by the legalisation and constitutionalisation of world politics. As widely documented in relevant literatures, the dynamics of this global legal order are shaped in particular by the increasing normative-legal relevance of individual and human rights (IHR) both in ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ law, including the status of IHR in violent conflicts (Forsythe, 2012; Gregg, 2012; Reus-Smit, 2001). As any other space in the world, Israel and Palestine are embedded in this global legal order. This chapter discusses how this global legal-normative order reconfigures the normative borders, power relations and interde-pendencies between Israel and Palestine, on the one hand, and the EU, on the other. Thus, the reconfiguration of global legal-normative orders, brought about by the growing relevance of IHR, is a key factor in understanding the evolving relationship between the EU and the parties in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A. and Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). ‘The Concept of Legalization’, International Organization 54(3): 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M., Zürn, M. and Buzan, B. (eds) (2013). Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association Agreement (2000). ‘Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part’, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/israel/documents/eu_israel/asso_agree_en.pdf, accessed on 13 February 2015.

  • Bellamy, A. (2008). ‘The Responsibility of Victory: Just Post Bellum and the Just War’, Review of International Studies 34(4): 601–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. and Castiglione, D. (2003). ‘Legitimising the “Euro”-Polity and Its “Regime”: The Normative Turn in European Studies’, European Journal of Political Theory 2(1): 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, P. (2012). ‘Globalization and In/Security: Middle Eastern Encounters with International Society and the Case of Turkey’, in S. Stetter (ed.), The Middle East and Globalisation: Encounters and Horizons, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacker, T. and Brodocz, A. (2001). ‘Im Namen der Menschenrechte: Zur symbolischen Integration der internationalen Gemeinschaft durch Normen’, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 8(2): 179–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, J. and Stetter, S. (2013). ‘Gouvernementalität im Nahen Osten: Machtpraktiken in Israel und Palästina aus weltgesellschaftstheoretischer Perspektive’, in A. Vasilache (ed.), Gouvernementalität, Staat und Weltgesellschaft: Studien zum Regieren im Anschluss an Toucault, Wiesbaden: VS-Springer, 197–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. (2004). From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crooke, A. (2007). ‘Our Second Biggest Mistake in the Middle East’, London Review of Books 29(13): 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitelhoff, N. (2009). ‘The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case’, International Organization 63(1): 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Sarto, R. A. (2007). ‘Wording and Meaning(s): EU-Israeli Political Cooperation According to the ENP Action Plan’, Mediterranean Politics 12(1): 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. (2013). ‘Normative Power as Hegemony’, Cooperation and Conflict 48(2): 194–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T., Albert, M. and Stetter, S. (eds) (2008). The European Union and Border Conflicts: The Power of Integration and Association, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T., Stetter, S. and Albert, M. (2006). ‘The European Union and Border Conflicts: The Transformative Power of Integration’, International Organization 60(3): 563–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013). ‘Guidelines on the Applicability of Israeli Entities and their Activities in the Territories Occupied by Israel since June 1967 for Grants, Prizes and Financial Instruments Funded by the EU from 2014 onwards’, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/israel/documents/related-links/20130719_guidelines_on_eligibility_of_israeli_entities_en.pdf.

  • European Council (1999). ‘Presidency Conclusions’, available at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/ACFB2.html-Fassbender, B. (1998). ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36, 529–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G. (2006). Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, D. (2012). Human Rights in International Relations, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. (2008). Israel’s Occupation, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, B. (2012). Human Rights as Social Construction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday T. C. (2009). ‘Recursivity of Global Lawmaking: A Socio legal Agenda’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5: 263–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICJ (International Court of Justice) (2004). ‘Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004’, available at http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1677.

  • Iriye, A., Goedde, P. and Hitchcock, W. I. (eds) (2012). TheHuman Rights Revolution: An International History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, A. (2005). Media, Politics and Democracy in Palestine: Political Culture, Pluralism, and the Palestinian Authority, Brighton: Sussex University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. (2012). Die Sakralität der Person: Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte, Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keene, E. (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. (2004). ‘EU External Governance in “Wider Europe”’, European Journal of Public Policy 11(4): 680–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le More, A. (2008). International Assistance to the Palestinians after Oslo: Political Guilt, Wasted Money, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Das Recht der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp [also published in English as Law as a Social System, 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press],

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2002). ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmer, H. (2007). ‘Contradiction, Conflict, and Borders’, in S. Stetter (ed.), Territorial Conflicts in World Society: Modern Systems Theory, International Relations and Conflict Studies, London: Routledge, 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, A. (2005). ‘Global Constitutionalism Revisited’, International Legal Theory 11:41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. and Newman, D. (eds) (2013). The Routledge Handbook on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. (1996). Pathways to Peace: The Multilateral Arab-Israeli Peace Talks, Washington, DC: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit, C. (2001). ‘Human Rights and the Social Construction of Sovereignty’, Review of International Studies 27(4): 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit (2009). The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit, C. (2011). Individual Rights and the Making of the International System, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, T., Ropp, S. C. and Sikkink, K. (1999). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smooha, S. (1997). ‘Ethnic Democracy: Israel as an Archetype’, Israel Studies 2(2): 198–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, G. (1999). ‘Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution’, Political Studies 47(3): 590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, G. (2013). ‘False Witness? EU-funded NGOs and Policymaking in the Arab-Israeli Conflict’, Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 2(2): 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetter, S. (2008). World Society and the Middle East: Reconstructions in Regional Politics, Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stetter, S. (2012). ‘Legitimitätspolitik in trans- und internationalen Konflikten: Dynamiken internationaler conflict governance am Beispiel des israelischpalästinensischen Konfliktes’, in C. Daase, A. Geis and F. Nullmeier (eds), Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik: Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen, Special Issue, Leviathan: Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft, 151–170.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stetter, S. (2013). ‘The EU as a Structured Power: Organizing EU Foreign Affairs within the Structural Environment of World Polities’, in M. Koch and S. Stetter (eds), Sociological Perspectives on International Organizations and the Construction of Global Political Order, Special Issue, Journal of International Organization Studies, 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2000). Die Weltgesellschaft: Soziologische Analysen, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvest, C. (2008). ‘“Our Passion for Legality”: International Law and Imperialism in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain’, Review of International Studies 34(3): 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tocci, N. (2008). ‘The EU and Conflict Resolution in Turkey and Georgia: Hindering EU Potential through the Political Management of Contractual Relations’, Journal of Common Market Studies 46(4): 875–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tocci, N. (2011). ‘The EU, the Middle East Quartet and (In) Effective Multilateralism’, Mercury e-paper No 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennesson, P. and Rajkovic, N. M. (2012). ‘The Transnational Politics of Warfare Accountability: Human Rights Watch versus the Israel Defense Forces’, International Relations 26(4): 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdirame, G. (2011). The UN and Human Rights: Who Guards the Guardians?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R. (ed.) (2010). The European Union and Democracy Promotion: A Critical Assessment, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Stephan Stetter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stetter, S. (2015). The Legal Foundations of Normative Borders and Normative Orders: Individual and Human Rights and the Israel-Palestine-EU Triangle. In: Del Sarto, R.A. (eds) Fragmented Borders, Interdependence and External Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137504142_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics