Abstract
Government ministries and other stakeholders are increasingly expecting and demanding that their national universities perform functions that transcend their traditional sense of purpose, including a role in innovation and economic development, the promotion of social equality, and fostering environmental sustainability. Some universities around the world have long engaged in this broad mission, including the great public universities in the United States; but for many other leading national universities, this so-called third mission is a relatively new concept. To date, efforts to become more engaged in the socioeconomic needs of nations simply mimic the more robust initiatives of some of the world’s leading universities (DiMaggio and Powell 1983), or simply incorporate well-meaning rhetoric aimed at influential constituents inside the university or prominent stakeholders outside.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altbach, Philip. 2007. “Empires of Knowledge and Development.” In World Class World Wide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America, edited by Philip Altbach and Jorge Balán. 1–28. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Altbach, Philip. G. 2011. “The Past, Present, and Future of the Research University.” In The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of World-Class Research Universities, edited by Philip G. Altbach and Jamil Salmi, 11–32. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. 2nd edition. London and New York: Verso.
Berdahl, Robert M. 1998. The Future of Flagship Universities. Convocation address presented at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Available online at: www.aasbi.com, accessed on 1 December 2014.
Bal á n, Jorge. 2012. “Research Universities in Latin America: The Challenges of Growth and Institutional Diversity.” Social Research: An International Quarterly, 79: 741–770.
Balán, Jorge. 2013. “Introduction: Latin American Higher Education Systems in a Historical and Comparative Perspective.” Latin America’s New Knowledge Economy: Higher Education, Government, and International Collaboration, edited by Jorge Balán, vii–xx. New York: Institute for International Education.
Bernasconi, Andrés. 2008. “Is There a Latin American Model of the University?” Comparative Education Review 52, no. 1: 27–52.
Bernasconi, Andrés. 2013a. “Are Global Rankings Unfair to Latin American Universites?” International Higher Education 72: 12–13.
Bernasconi, Andrés. 2013b. “Government and University Autonomy: The Governance Structure of Latin American Public Institutions.” Latin America’s New Knowledge Economy: Higher Education, Government, and International Collaboration, edited by Jorge Balán, 1–17. New York: Institute for International Education.
Brunner, José Joaquin and Ferrada, Rocía, eds. 2011. Educación superior en Iberoamérica: Informe 2011. Santiago, Chile: CINDA-UNIVERSIA.
Castro, Claudio, and Levy, Daniel. 2000. Myth, Reality and Reform. Higher Education Policy in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
CEPAL, Comisión Económica para América latin y el caribe. 2013. Panorama Social de América Latina. Santiago: Naciones Unidas.
Daniel, John S. 1996. Megauniversities and Knowledge Media. London: Kogan Page.
Didriksson, Axel. 2006. Caracterizacióny Desarrollo de las Macrouniversidades de América Latinay el Caribe. Available online at: http://sic.conaculta.gob.mx/centrodoc_documentos/559.pdf. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizations Fields.” American Sociological Review 48, no. 2: 147–160.
Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, eds. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lemaitre, María José, and Zenteno, María Elisa. 2012. Aseguramiento de la Calidad en Iberoamérica. Santiago de Chile: CINDA.
Levy, Daniel C. 1994. “Higher Education amid the Political-Economic Changes of the 1990s. Report of the LASA Task Force on Higher Education.” LASA Forum, 25, no. 1 (Spring).
Levy, D. C. 1986. Higher Education and the State in Latin America: Private Challenges to Public Dominance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merriam, Sharan. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Odorika, Imanol, and Pusser, Brian. 2006. “Lamáxima casa de estudios: Universidad Autónoma de Mé xico as a State-Building University.” In World Class World Wide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America, edited by Philip Altbach and Jorge Balán, 189–215. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
RICYT, Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología. 2013. El estado de la ciencia 2013. At http://www.ricyt.org/publicaciones. Consulted January 23, 2015.
Schwartzman, Simon. 1991. Latin America: Higher Education in a Lost Decade. Prospects, 21, no. 3: 363–373.
Serrano, Sol. 1994. Universidad y nación. Chile en el siglo XIX. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Andrés Bernasconi and Dan Véliz Calderón
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bernasconi, A., Calderón, D.V. (2016). Latin American Flagship Universities: From Early Notions of State Building to Seeking a Larger Role in Society. In: Douglass, J.A. (eds) The New Flagship University. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137500496_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137500496_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57665-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50049-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)