Skip to main content

Communicative Practices in Staff Support of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health

Abstract

This chapter is about some of the ways in which adults with intellectual disabilities (such as, e.g. those with Down syndrome) communicate with those around them — most specifically, with staff who are charged with supporting them. Such staff help service users live independently, by overseeing their day-to-day household activities, arranging travel, planning leisure outings, and providing accompaniment to institutional appointments. In the United Kingdom (UK),1 recent government policy places great value on the activities of support staff in the promotion of choice, control, and empowerment. The Care Act 2014 (UK Government, 2014) placed a duty on local authorities to promote an individual’s well-being, which includes ‘control by the individual over day-to-day life (including over care and support)’ and ‘participation in work, education, training or recreation’. In doing this, the authority must have regard for ‘the individual’s wishes, views, feelings or beliefs’, with the individual ‘participating as fully as possible in decisions … and being provided with the information and support necessary to enable the individual to participate’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antaki, C. (2012). Seven interactional benefits of physical tasks for people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C. (2013). Two conversational practices for encouraging adults with intellectual disabilities to reflect on their activities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(6), 580–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C., Finlay, W. M. L., Walton, C., & Pate, L. (2008). Offering choice to people with an intellectual impairment: An interactional study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 1165–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamer, S., & Brookes, M. (2001). Making decisions: Best practice and new ideas for supporting people with high support needs to make decisions. London: VIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, J. (2001). Who’s in control?: Decision-making by people with learning difficulties who have high support needs. London: Values Into Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, W. M. L., & Antaki, C. (2012). How staff pursue questions to adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, W. M. L., Antaki, C., & Walton, C. (2008a). Promoting choice and control in residential services for people with learning disabilities. Disability and Society, 23, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2008b). Saying no to the staff — An analysis of refusals in a home for people with severe communication difficulties. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30, 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddington, P. (2010). Turn-taking for turntaking: Mobility, time, and action in the sequential organization of junction negotiations in cars. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 372–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2003). Time to make up your mind: Why choosing is difficult. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2005). The Government’s annual report on Learning Disability, 2005. Valuing people: Making things better. Norwich: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardized interview. The living questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson, J., Copeland, C., Drivas, B., Scoon, H., & Yap, M. L. (1992). Decision-making by community residents with an intellectual disability. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 18, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keevallik, L. (2010). Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 401–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 277–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learning Disability Taskforce. (2004). Rights, independence, choice and inclusion. London: Learning Disability Taskforce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1988). Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs, 55, 360–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister’s Policy Unit. (2005) Improving the life chances of disabled people.Retrieved on June 2015 at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/strategy/assets/disability.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Unit. (2005) Improving services, improving lives: Evidence and key themes. Interim report. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, V. (2010). Disability and discourse: Analysing inclusive conversation with people with intellectual disabilities. Chichester, England: Wiley/Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government. (2005). Mental Capacity Act. Retrieved on June 2015 at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2104). Care Act. Retrieved on June 2015 at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/contents

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinken, J., & Ogiermann, E. (2011). How to propose an action as objectively necessary: The case of polish trzeba x (‘One Needs to x’). Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Recommended reading

  • • Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Chichester, UK: Blackwell-Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • • Williams, V. (2010). Disability and discourse: Analysing inclusive conversation with people with intellectual disabilities. Chichester, England: Wiley/Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Charles Antaki, W. M. L. Finlay, Chris Walton, and Joe Sempik

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Antaki, C., Finlay, W.M.L., Walton, C., Sempik, J. (2016). Communicative Practices in Staff Support of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. In: O’Reilly, M., Lester, J.N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496850_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics