‘Strange Borrowing’: Affective Neuroscience, Neoliberalism and the ‘Cruelly Optimistic’ Gendered Bodies of CrossFit
- 728 Downloads
The history of representation of the female athlete has been cyclic, from the ‘babes’ and ‘muscle molls’ of the early twentieth century to the ‘hotnesss’ quotients assigned in the twenty-first (Heywood and Dworkin, 2000). What has remained fairly consistent is that traditionally feminine athletes are idealized, and more ‘masculine’ athletes denigrated, with a few notable exceptions in the 1940s, 1990s, and within a specific athletic culture in the present — that of CrossFit, a 10,000-plus global network of affiliated gyms or ‘boxes’ as they are called within the subculture to mark their back-to-basics, low-tech approach to fitness. CrossFit as a training methodology is a multidisciplinary physical practice where men and women train together in a high-intensity programme run by a coach who takes a small group (anywhere from 5 to 20 people depending on location) through a prescribed set of exercises that includes running, gymnastics, Olympic lifting and powerlifting, rope climbing, tyre flipping, plyometrics, and pretty much anything else that can be imagined. The current representational demographic, though somewhat varied, has become more conservative since the 1990s, but CrossFit marks one emergent cultural site that creates an alternative reality where body expectations and ideals tend to be non-normative, and ‘real’, functional bodies are idealized.
KeywordsFemale Athlete Affective Balance Historical Present Affective System Beauty Ideal
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cromwell, Howard Casey and Jaak Panksepp (2011) ‘Rethinking the cognitive revolution from a neural perspective: How overuse/misuse of the term “cognition” and the neglect of affective controls in behavior neuroscience could be delaying progress in understanding the BrainMind’, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review?, 35(2011), pp. 2026–2035. Available online at: http://www.crossfit.com/cf-info/what-crossfit.html, http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidtao/2013/06/02/how-crossfit-embraced-fans-and -became-the-next-great-spectator-sport/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heywood, Leslie (1998) Bodymakers: A Cultural Anatomy of Women’s Bodybuilding? New Brunswick: Rutgers UP.Google Scholar
- Heywood, Leslie (2007) ‘Producing girls: Empire, sport, and the neoliberal body’, in Jennifer Hargreaves and Patricia Vertinsky (eds) Physical Culture, Power, and the Body? New York: Routledge, pp. 101–120.Google Scholar
- Heywood, Leslie and Shari Dworkin (2000) Built to Win: The Female Athlete as Cultural Icon? Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Moore, Kelly (2013) ‘Fear and fun: Science and gender, emotion and embodiment under neoliberalism’, in Elizabeth Bernstein and Janet R. Jakobsen (eds) The Scholar and the Feminist Onlin? (11.1–11.2 Fall 2012/Spring 2013).Google Scholar
- Panksepp, Jaak (1998) Affective Neuroscience? Oxford and New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
- Panksepp, Jaak (2000) ‘Emotions as natural kinds within the mammalian brain’, in M. Lewis and J. M. Haviland-Jones (eds) Handbook of Emotions? 2nd Edition, New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 137–156.Google Scholar
- Panksepp, Jaak and Lucy Biven (2012) The Archaeology of Mind: The Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions? New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Papoulias, Constantina and Felicity Callard (2010) ‘Biology’s gift: Interrogating the turn to affect’, Body & Societ?, 16(29).Google Scholar
- Rose, Nicholas (2013) ‘The human sciences in a biological age’, Theory, Culture & Societ?, 30(1), 3–34, p. 4. Available online at: http://sfonline.barnard.edu/gender-justice-and-neoliberal-transformations/fear-and-fun -science-and-gender-emotion-and-embodiment-under-neoliberalism/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar