Abstract
Like many other scientists before and after him, the Swedish oceanog-rapher and physicist Hans Pettersson (1888–1966) was exposed to scientific activity from an early age. He grew up surrounded by scientific and cultural interests, in a household where ‘the elite from the scientific world gathered’.1 Later, he recreated the ‘atmosphere’ of his upbringing in his own home, with assistance from his wife Dagmar (née Wendel, 1888–1978).2 In 1914, Pettersson received a PhD in physics. After doing radioactivity research at the Radium Institute in Vienna for a period in the 1920s — work for which he is best known — he returned to Sweden. In 1930 he was appointed the nation’s first Professor of Oceanography. Since the 1890s, his father Otto Pettersson (1848–1941) had exercised an increasingly international influence over oceanography. Growing up with a ‘renowned oceanographer’ as a father, and with a laboratory on the family estate, Hans Pettersson inherited science as a product of family relations.3
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
H. Pettersson (1954) Westward Ho with the Albatross (London: Macmillan), p. vi.
H.M. Pycior, N.G. Slack and P.G. Abir-Am (eds) (1996) Creative Couples in the Sciences (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).
P.G. Abir-Am and D. Outram (1987) ‘Introduction’, in P.G. Abir-Am and D. Outram (eds) Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Women in Science 1789–1979 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).
A. Lykknes, D.L. Opitz and B. Van Tiggelen (eds) (2012) For Better or Worse? Collaborative Couples in the Sciences (Basel: Birkhäuser).
J. Secord (2004) ‘Knowledge in Transit’, Isis, 95, 654–72: 655.
S. Shapin (1995) ‘Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge’, Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 289–321: 307.
A. Ophir and S. Shapin (1991) ‘The Place of Knowledge: A Methodological Survey’, Science in Context, 4, 3–21: 16.
J. Golinski (1998) Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 169, 172.
D. Livingstone (2003) Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 139.
D. Hess (1997) Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction (New York: New York University).
P. Galison (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 435.
D. Kaiser (ed.) (2005) Pedagogy and the Practice of Science: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
J. Rudolph (2008) ‘Historical Writing on Science Education: A View of the Landscape’, Studies in Science Education, 44, 63–82.
G. Beer (1996) Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter (Oxford: Clarendon), pp. 4–5.
S. Bergwik (2014) ‘An Assemblage of Science and Home: The Gendered Lifestyle of Svante Arrhenius and Twentieth Century Physical Chemistry’, Isis, 105, 265–91.
A. Svansson (2006) Otto Pettersson: Oceanografen, kemisten, uppfinnaren (G·teborg: Tre b·cker), pp. 125–6.
H. Pettersson (1939) Oceanografiska institutet (Göteborg: Wettergren and Kerber), p. 3.
A. Rodhe (1999) ‘Hans Petterssons dag-bok 1911–1912: Inledning’, Vikarvet, 39, 18–26: 23.
H. Pettersson (1938) En självbiografi (Göteborg), p. 17.
E. Crawford and A. Svansson (2003) Neptun och Mammon: Otto Petterssons brev till Gustaf Ekman 1884–1929 (Göteborg: Tre böcker), p. 55.
E Nornvall and A. Svansson (1998) ‘Bornö Oceanographic Station: The Foundation of a Marine Station in Sweden’, History of Oceanography, 10, 5–8: 7.
M. Deacon (1997) Scientists and the Sea 1650–1900 (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. xiii–xiv, 388–90.
D. Coen (2007) Vienna in the Age of Uncertainty: Science, Liberalism and Private Life (Chicago: Chicago University Press), pp. 19–20.
S. Widmalm (2001) Det öppna laboratoriet: Uppsalafysiken och dess nätverk 1853–1910 (Stockholm: Atlantis).
M.J. Nye (1996) Before Big Science: The Pursuit of Modern Chemistry and Physics (New York: Twayne Publishers), pp. 9–12.
L. Davidoff (1995) Worlds Between: Historical Perspectives on Gender and Class (Oxford: Polity).
G. Kyle (1987) ‘Genrebilder av kvinnor: En studie i sekelskiftets borgerliga familjehierarkier’, Historisk tidskrift, 107, 36–40.
H. Pettersson (1938) En självbiografi (Göteborg), p. 4.
M. Rentetzi (2007) Trafficking Materials and Gendered Experimental Practices: Radium Research in Early 20th Century Vienna (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 116.
S. Bergwik (2014) ‘A Fractured Position in a Stable Partnership: Ebba Hult, Gerard De Geer and Early Twentieth Century Geology’, Science in Context, 27, 423–51.
R. Stuewer (1985) ‘Artificial Disintegration and the Cambridge-Vienna Controversy’, in P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway (eds) Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), p. 290.
E.T. Crawford (1996) Arrhenius: From Ionic Theory to the Greenhouse Effect (Canton: Science History Publications), pp. 121, 135–6.
J. Hughes (2003) ‘Radioactivity and Nuclear Physics’ in M.J. Nye (ed.) The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 5: The Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 350–74: 357.
O. Hannaway (1976) ‘The German Model of Chemical Education in America: Ira Remsen at Johns Hopkins 1876–1913’, Ambix, 23, 145–64: 145, 149.
G. Ekman (1923) ‘Till Otto Pettersson’, in G. Ekman (ed.) Festskrift tillägnad professor Otto Pettersson den 12 februari 1923 (Helsingfors: Holger Schildt), p. 98.
A. Elzinga (1997) ‘From Arrhenius to Megascience: Interplay between Science and Public Decisionmaking’, Ambio, 26, 72–6.
M. Rehn (2001) ‘Auktoritet och atom-sprängning: Hans Pettersson och Cambridge-Wienkontroversen’, Lychnos, pp. 103–131: 107.
E. Rona (1978) How It Came About: Radioactivity, Nuclear Physics, Atomic Energy (Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge Associated Universities), p. 61.
B. Lindberg and I. Nilsson (1996) Göteborgs universitets historia (Göteborg: University of Gothenburg), p. 212.
R.M. Friedman (2001) The Politics of Excellence: Behind the Nobel Prize in Science (New York: W.H. Freeman), pp. 48–53.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Staffan Bergwik
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bergwik, S. (2016). Father, Son, and the Entrepreneurial Spirit: Otto Pettersson, Hans Pettersson, and the Early Twentieth-Century Inheritance of Oceanography. In: Opitz, D.L., Bergwik, S., Van Tiggelen, B. (eds) Domesticity in the Making of Modern Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137492739_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137492739_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55902-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49273-9
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)