Skip to main content

Father, Son, and the Entrepreneurial Spirit: Otto Pettersson, Hans Pettersson, and the Early Twentieth-Century Inheritance of Oceanography

  • Chapter

Abstract

Like many other scientists before and after him, the Swedish oceanog-rapher and physicist Hans Pettersson (1888–1966) was exposed to scientific activity from an early age. He grew up surrounded by scientific and cultural interests, in a household where ‘the elite from the scientific world gathered’.1 Later, he recreated the ‘atmosphere’ of his upbringing in his own home, with assistance from his wife Dagmar (née Wendel, 1888–1978).2 In 1914, Pettersson received a PhD in physics. After doing radioactivity research at the Radium Institute in Vienna for a period in the 1920s — work for which he is best known — he returned to Sweden. In 1930 he was appointed the nation’s first Professor of Oceanography. Since the 1890s, his father Otto Pettersson (1848–1941) had exercised an increasingly international influence over oceanography. Growing up with a ‘renowned oceanographer’ as a father, and with a laboratory on the family estate, Hans Pettersson inherited science as a product of family relations.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. H. Pettersson (1954) Westward Ho with the Albatross (London: Macmillan), p. vi.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H.M. Pycior, N.G. Slack and P.G. Abir-Am (eds) (1996) Creative Couples in the Sciences (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.G. Abir-Am and D. Outram (1987) ‘Introduction’, in P.G. Abir-Am and D. Outram (eds) Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Women in Science 1789–1979 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Lykknes, D.L. Opitz and B. Van Tiggelen (eds) (2012) For Better or Worse? Collaborative Couples in the Sciences (Basel: Birkhäuser).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Secord (2004) ‘Knowledge in Transit’, Isis, 95, 654–72: 655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Shapin (1995) ‘Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge’, Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 289–321: 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Ophir and S. Shapin (1991) ‘The Place of Knowledge: A Methodological Survey’, Science in Context, 4, 3–21: 16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Golinski (1998) Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 169, 172.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Livingstone (2003) Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 139.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Hess (1997) Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction (New York: New York University).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Galison (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 435.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Kaiser (ed.) (2005) Pedagogy and the Practice of Science: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Rudolph (2008) ‘Historical Writing on Science Education: A View of the Landscape’, Studies in Science Education, 44, 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Beer (1996) Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter (Oxford: Clarendon), pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Bergwik (2014) ‘An Assemblage of Science and Home: The Gendered Lifestyle of Svante Arrhenius and Twentieth Century Physical Chemistry’, Isis, 105, 265–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Svansson (2006) Otto Pettersson: Oceanografen, kemisten, uppfinnaren (G·teborg: Tre b·cker), pp. 125–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Pettersson (1939) Oceanografiska institutet (Göteborg: Wettergren and Kerber), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Rodhe (1999) ‘Hans Petterssons dag-bok 1911–1912: Inledning’, Vikarvet, 39, 18–26: 23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Pettersson (1938) En självbiografi (Göteborg), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Crawford and A. Svansson (2003) Neptun och Mammon: Otto Petterssons brev till Gustaf Ekman 1884–1929 (Göteborg: Tre böcker), p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  21. E Nornvall and A. Svansson (1998) ‘Bornö Oceanographic Station: The Foundation of a Marine Station in Sweden’, History of Oceanography, 10, 5–8: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Deacon (1997) Scientists and the Sea 1650–1900 (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. xiii–xiv, 388–90.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Coen (2007) Vienna in the Age of Uncertainty: Science, Liberalism and Private Life (Chicago: Chicago University Press), pp. 19–20.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Widmalm (2001) Det öppna laboratoriet: Uppsalafysiken och dess nätverk 1853–1910 (Stockholm: Atlantis).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M.J. Nye (1996) Before Big Science: The Pursuit of Modern Chemistry and Physics (New York: Twayne Publishers), pp. 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Davidoff (1995) Worlds Between: Historical Perspectives on Gender and Class (Oxford: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Kyle (1987) ‘Genrebilder av kvinnor: En studie i sekelskiftets borgerliga familjehierarkier’, Historisk tidskrift, 107, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Pettersson (1938) En självbiografi (Göteborg), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Rentetzi (2007) Trafficking Materials and Gendered Experimental Practices: Radium Research in Early 20th Century Vienna (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Bergwik (2014) ‘A Fractured Position in a Stable Partnership: Ebba Hult, Gerard De Geer and Early Twentieth Century Geology’, Science in Context, 27, 423–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R. Stuewer (1985) ‘Artificial Disintegration and the Cambridge-Vienna Controversy’, in P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway (eds) Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), p. 290.

    Google Scholar 

  32. E.T. Crawford (1996) Arrhenius: From Ionic Theory to the Greenhouse Effect (Canton: Science History Publications), pp. 121, 135–6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Hughes (2003) ‘Radioactivity and Nuclear Physics’ in M.J. Nye (ed.) The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 5: The Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 350–74: 357.

    Google Scholar 

  34. O. Hannaway (1976) ‘The German Model of Chemical Education in America: Ira Remsen at Johns Hopkins 1876–1913’, Ambix, 23, 145–64: 145, 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. G. Ekman (1923) ‘Till Otto Pettersson’, in G. Ekman (ed.) Festskrift tillägnad professor Otto Pettersson den 12 februari 1923 (Helsingfors: Holger Schildt), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Elzinga (1997) ‘From Arrhenius to Megascience: Interplay between Science and Public Decisionmaking’, Ambio, 26, 72–6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Rehn (2001) ‘Auktoritet och atom-sprängning: Hans Pettersson och Cambridge-Wienkontroversen’, Lychnos, pp. 103–131: 107.

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. Rona (1978) How It Came About: Radioactivity, Nuclear Physics, Atomic Energy (Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge Associated Universities), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  39. B. Lindberg and I. Nilsson (1996) Göteborgs universitets historia (Göteborg: University of Gothenburg), p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  40. R.M. Friedman (2001) The Politics of Excellence: Behind the Nobel Prize in Science (New York: W.H. Freeman), pp. 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Staffan Bergwik

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bergwik, S. (2016). Father, Son, and the Entrepreneurial Spirit: Otto Pettersson, Hans Pettersson, and the Early Twentieth-Century Inheritance of Oceanography. In: Opitz, D.L., Bergwik, S., Van Tiggelen, B. (eds) Domesticity in the Making of Modern Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137492739_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137492739_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55902-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49273-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics