Skip to main content

Governing the Queen’s Household

  • Chapter
  • 743 Accesses

Part of the book series: Queenship and Power ((QAP))

Abstract

As queens consort, Henrietta Maria and Marie Antoinette became mistresses of vast households of servants and legal administrators of numerous estates. The bestowal of these households and properties as dower lands in exchange for an actual or promised dowry was crucial to the legitimacy of an Early Modern European royal marriage. The precise nature of a princess’s settlement was central to the diplomatic negotiations that sealed a union between two sovereign powers. The extent of the dower lands, size of the household, and the degree of autonomy the bride received in the management of these spheres reflected the balance of the power between royal houses. once married, the administration of the household and estates provided the consort with opportunities for cultural, religious, and political patronage, allowing her a relatively independent space to further her own conception of her role as wife to the sovereign and mother of the royal children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Elizabeth Fox-Genovese, “Women and Work,” in Samia I. Spencer (ed.), French Women and the Age of Enlightenment (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1984), pp. 114–115

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sara Mendelson and Patricia Crawford, Women in Early Modern England 1550–1720 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 309–310.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Ruth Kleinman, “Social Dynamics at the French Court: The Household of Anne of Austria,” French Historical Studies (Volume 16, Number 3, Spring 1990), p. 318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See Caroline Hibbard, “Translating Royalty: Henrietta Maria and the Transition from Princess to Queen,” The Court Historian (Volume I, 2000), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vivian R. Gruder, “The Question of Marie Antoinette: The Queen and Public Opinion before the Revolution,” French History (Volume 16, Number 3, 2002), p. 295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin Butler, The Stuart CourtMasque andPolitical Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caroline Hibbard, “The Role of a Queen Consort: The Household and Court of Henrietta Maria, 1625–1642,” in Ronald G. Asch and Adolf M. Birke, Princes, Patronage and the Nobility: The Court at the Beginning of the Modern Age (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 393–394.

    Google Scholar 

  8. John Bruce, William Douglass Hamilton, and Sophia Crawford Lomas (eds.), Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series, of the reign of Charles I, preserved in the State Paper Department of Her Majesty’s Public Record Office (London: Public Record Office, 1858), Volume 1625–1626, pp. 66

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. R. R. Fisher, “The Queene’s Court in Her Councell Chamber at Westminster,” The English Historical Review (Volume 108, Number 427, April 1993) pp. 314–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul Sonnino, Mazarin’s Quest: The Congress of Westphalia and the Coming of the Fronde (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), p. 11.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Edward Peyton, The Divine Catastrophe of the Kingly Family of the House of Stuart or, A short history of the rise, reign and ruin thereof (London: Giles Calvert, 1652), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Norman Egbert McClure (ed.), The Letters ofJohn Chamberlain, 2 volumes (Philadelphia, PA: The American Philosophical Society, 1939), Volume 1, p. 630.

    Google Scholar 

  13. William Prynne, Historio-matix or The Players Scourge (London: Michael Sparke, 1633)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jean-Francois Solnon, La Cour de France (Paris: Fayard, 1987), p. 433.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Louis Nicolardot, Journal de Louis XVI (Paris: E. Dentu, 1873), p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elisabeth Reynaud, Le Petit Trianon et MarieAntoinette (Paris: Éditions SW Télémaque, 2010), pp. 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Annick Notter, The Palace of Fontainebleau (Versailles: Artlys, 2007), pp. 52–53

    Google Scholar 

  18. Historians who posit that political pornography was a significant cause of the French Revolution, most notably Robert Darnton, Lynn Hunt, and Chantal Thomas argue that obscene images of Marie Antoinette and her circle were widely available and influential throughout Louis’s reign. See Robert Darnton, The Literary Underground of the Old Regime (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), pp. 195–196

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Carolyn Harris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, C. (2016). Governing the Queen’s Household. In: Queenship and Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Queenship and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137491688_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137491688_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57026-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49168-8

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics