Advertisement

Visual Framing of 2014 US Senate Campaign: Conflict Bias in News Coverage

  • Joan L. Conners

Abstract

When voters think of a political campaign, some may think “contest” or “competition,” while others may think “conflict.” Some voters may see these as interchangeable synonyms when thinking of electoral politics. For others, these may be dramatically different concepts, perhaps each related to campaigns and elections, but with varying connotations. If we think of these in the context of media coverage of campaigns, examples may quickly come to mind of news stories that have demonstrated these ideas. But how do news reports demonstrate the notion of contest, or conflict, in a campaign and with what possible effect on voters? These questions underlie the issues raised in this chapter on news coverage of the 2014 US Senate campaigns.

Keywords

News Story Front Page News Coverage Presidential Campaign Visual Framing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrew, B. C. (2007). Media-generated shortcuts: Do newspaper headlines present another road for low-information rationality? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(2), 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, W. L. (2012). News: The politics of illusion (9th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. L., & Stein, K. A. (2004). Newspaper coverage of presidential primary debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 40(4), 246–258.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, C. E., & McCombs, M. (2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman, R., & Banning, S. (2006). Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conners, J. L. (2008). Debate battles? Analysis of front-page photographs of the 2004 presidential debates. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  7. Dunaway, J., & Stein, R. M. (2013). Early voting and campaign news coverage. Political Communication, 30(2), 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, J. L. (2012). Visual literacy and visual politics: Photojournalism and the 2004 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly, 60(5), 681–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Entman, R. (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fogarty, B. J. (2013). Scandals, news coverage, and the 2006 Congressional elections. Political Communication, 30(3), 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortunato, J. A. (2014). Setting the media agenda: A study of Angelina Jolie’s op-ed announcing her undergoing a preventative double mastectomy. Florida Communication Journal, 42(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  12. Grabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gulati, G. J., Just. M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (2004). News coverage of political campaigns. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 237–256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Hayes, C. (2008). Trivial pursuit: It happens too often in political coverage. Nieman Reports, 62(2), 46–48.Google Scholar
  15. Jamieson, K. J., & Waldman, P. (2003). The press effect: Politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (2002). The slant of the news: How editorial endorsements influence campaign coverage and citizens’ views of candidates. American Political Science Review, 96(2), 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaplan, M., Goldstein, K., & Hale, M. (2005). Local news coverage of the 2004 campaigns: An analysis of nightly news broadcasts. A report for the Lear Center Local News Archive, a project of the USC Annenberg School and the University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://www.localnewsarchive.org/pdf/LCLNAFinal2004.pdfGoogle Scholar
  18. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Love, B., & Fico, F. (2006). Framing by reporters, partisan and non-partisan sources in newspaper coverage of U.S. senate races in 2004. Paper presented to the International Communication Association Convention, Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar
  20. Morris, J. S., & Forgette, R. (2007). News grazers, television news, political knowledge, and engagement. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paletz, D. L., & Entman, R. M. (1981). Media power politics. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Reber, B. H., and Benoit, W. L. (2001). Presidential debate stories accentuate the negative. Newspaper Research Journal, 22(3), 30–43.Google Scholar
  23. Wanta, W. (1988). The effects of dominant photographs: An agenda-setting experiment. Journalism Quarterly, 65(1), 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Joan L. Conners 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan L. Conners

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations