Advertisement

Commonsense Protections or Government Interference in Private Decisions? Competing Media Frames in the Battle Over Tennessee’s Abortion Amendment

  • Amy E. Jasperson
  • Charles KelleyJr.
  • Kirby Bennett

Abstract

Campaign seasons, especially in midterm elections, are more than just about federal political candidates. As efforts to make progress in Congress meet with gridlock, and as significant efforts are mounted to alter state constitutions to advance political agendas, scholars of political communication need to focus attention on the campaign strategies employed in issue campaigns at the state level. This chapter outlines one of the 2014 battles on abortion, an issue of prominence on political agendas in states across the nation (Wyler, 2014). Tennessee Amendment 1 was an effort to rewrite the Tennessee Constitution to eliminate privacy protections for women on the issue of abortion. This case is striking in that, prior to the 2014 vote, Tennessee law provided the most protective privacy laws for women in the South. As abortion clinics closed in surrounding states, Tennessee remained a state where an abortion could be obtained without the same restrictions and obstacles faced in other states, causing pro-life forces to dub Tennessee an “abortion tourism” state (Wadhwani, 2014a). The outcome of this campaign is significant for the direction of women’s abortion rights in the South. Further, the framing strategies used in this campaign have implications for future communication efforts related to this issue. In particular, we found that both sides used frames that are typically used by the other side. We analyze the significance and possible implications of these “refraining” efforts and discuss the boundaries of such strategies going forward. This research examines the nature of campaign messages generated by the Yes-on-1 and No-on-One groups as they waged their battle over abortion rights in Tennessee.

Keywords

Voter Turnout Plan Parenthood Vote Choice Media Market Campaign Finance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez, R., & Brehm, J. (1995). American ambivalence towards abortion policy: Development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 1055–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee. (n.d.). The outcome of Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee et al. v. Sundquist. Retrieved from http://www.aclu-tn.org/Legislative/TN%20Abortion%20Statute%20Challenge-%20TSC%20Decision%202000.pdf
  3. Baptist & Reflector. Tennesseans face “monumental” vote, says Davis. (2014, October 21). Retrieved from http://tnbaptist.org/BRARticle.asp?ID=5326
  4. Bureau of Ethics and Campaign Finance. (2014). Registered referendum committee. Retrieved from http://www.tn.gov/tref/refcom/ref_com.htm
  5. Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions. (2014, April 28–May 13). Vanderbilt University poll. Retrieved from http://www.vanderbilt.edu/csdi/May_2014_VUPoll_Slides.pdf
  6. City-Data.com (2010). Tennessee—Religions. Retrieved from http://www.city-data.com/states/Tennessee-Religions.html
  7. Cook Political Report. (2013). Partisan voting index: Districts of the 113th Congress. Retrieved from http://cookpolitical.com/file/2013-04-47.pdf
  8. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ertelt, S. (2013, 9 October). Duggar family rallies for pro-life amendment on abortion in Tennessee. LifeNews.com. Retrieved from http://www.lifenews.com/2013/10/09/duggar-family-rallies-for-pro-life-amendment-on-abortion-in-tennessee/
  10. Grant, J. T., & Rudolph, T. J. (2004). Expression vs. equality: The politics of campaign finance reform. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gross, K., & D’Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guttmacher Institute. (2014a). An overview of abortion in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/presentations/ab_slides.html
  14. Guttmacher Institute. (2014b). In just the last 4 years, states have enacted 231 abortion restrictions. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/media/infographics/last-four-years-231-restrictions.html
  15. Guttmacher Institute. (2015). State policies in brief: An overview of abortion laws. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/
  16. Klar, S., Robison, J., & Druckman, J. N. (2013). Political dynamics of framing. In T. N. Ridout (Ed.), New directions in media and politics (pp. 173–192). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Locker, R. (2011, April 18). Tennessee Senate advances abortion amendment. Commercial Appeal. Retrieved from http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/local-news/tennessee-senate-advances-abortion-amendment
  18. Nash, E., Gold, R., Rathburn, G., & Vierboom, Y. (2015, January 1). Laws affecting reproductive health and rights: 2014 state policy review. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/updates/2014/statetrends42014.html
  19. National Conference of State Legislatures. (n.d.). Ballot measure database. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/ballot-measures-database.aspx
  20. Nelson, T., Clauson, R., and Oxley, Z. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effects on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W. 3d 1 (Tenn. 2000).Google Scholar
  22. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pew Research Center. (2013a, January 16). Religious groups’ official positions on abortion. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2013/01/16/religious-groups-official-positions-on-abortion/
  24. Pew Research Center. (2013b, January 16). Roe v. Wade at 40: Most oppose overturning abortion decision. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2013/01/16/roe-v-wade-at-40/
  25. Phillips, B. (2014, June 26). Amendment to Tennessee constitution threatens abortion access. Memphis Flyer. Retrieved from http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/amendment-to-tennessee-constitution-threatens-abortion-access/Content?oid=3692943
  26. Roach, D. (2014, October 2). Pro-life amendments considered in TN, ND. Baptist Press. Retrieved from http://www.bpnews.net/43463/prolife-amendments-considered-in-tn-nd
  27. Siner, E. (2014, September 30). New poll on abortion amendment comes with conflicting interpretations. Nashville Public Radio. Retrieved from http://nashvillepublicradio.org/blog/2014/09/30/new-poll-abortion-amendment-comes-conflicting-interpretations/
  28. Smith, M. (2014, October 29). MTSU releases statewide survey on amendment 1 attitudes. MTSU Sidelines. Retrieved from http://mtsusidelines.com/2014/10/mtsu-releases-statewide-survey-on-amendment-1-attitudes/
  29. Tennessee Secretary of State. (2014a, December 3). Election results for constitutional amendment 1 by county. Retrieved from http://www.tn.gov/sos/election/results/20141104_CountyTotals_01.pdf
  30. Tennessee Secretary of State. (2014b). Statistical analysis of voter turnout for the November 4, 2014 election as submitted by the counties. Retrieved from http://www.tn.gov/sos/election/data/turnout/20141104_Turnout.pdf
  31. Tennessee Senate Joint Resolution 127, TN S.J.R. 127, 106th Tennessee General Assembly. (2009, June 03). Retrieved from http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/106/Bill/SJR0127.pdf
  32. TN SJR0127 2009–2010 106th General Assembly. (2009, June 03). LegiScan. Retrieved from https://legiscan.com/TN/bill/SJR0127/2009
  33. Toalston, A. (2014, November 1). Planned Parenthood pushes TN for abortion. Baptist Press. Retrieved from http://www.bpnews.net/43647/planned-parenthood-pushes-tn-for-abortion
  34. Vote-No-on-One Tennessee (2014a, October 2). Stop government interference (Facebook update). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/voteno1tn
  35. Vote-No-on-One Tennessee (2014b, October 14). New TV ad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq4iVplJ9fA (Facebook update). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/voteno1tn
  36. Vote-No-on-One Tennessee. (2014c). Retrieved from http://voteno1tn.org
  37. Wadhwani, A. (2014a, October 29). In Tenn., a fierce, expensive battle over abortion. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/10/29/abortion-measures-ballots-3-states/18128475/
  38. Wadhwani, A. (2014b, November 6). Tennessee Amendment 1 abortion measure passes. The Tennessean. Retrieved from http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2014/11/04/amendment-takes-early-lead/18493787/
  39. West, D. (2013). Air wars: Television advertising and social media in Election campaigns, 1952–2012 (6th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  40. Weichmann, J. G. (Ed.). (1993). NTC’s dictionary of advertising (2nd ed.). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.Google Scholar
  41. Wilkey, L. (2014a, September 23). Churches can address political issues. Baptist and Reflector. Retrieved from http://www.tnbaptist.org/BRARticle.asp?ID=5300
  42. Wilkey, L. (2014b, October 21). Making the right choice. Baptist and Reflector. Retrieved from http://www.tnbaptist.org/BRARticle.asp?ID=5325
  43. Wilkey, L. (2013, November 20). Tenn. implementation vote slated for 2014. Baptist Press. Retrieved from http://www.bpnews.net/41523/tenn-implementation-vote-slated-for-2014
  44. Wyler, G. (2014, February 6). Battles over abortion flare in 2014. Retrieved from http://time.com/5284/battles-over-abortion-flare-in-2014/
  45. Yes on 1. (2014a, September 25). Yes on 1 Sunday. http://www.yeson1tn.org/church_participation (Facebook update). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/yeson1tn
  46. Yes on 1. (2014b, October 17). People are speaking out across the state (Facebook update). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/yeson1tn
  47. Yes on 1. (2014c, November 2). Restoring life to Tennessee (Facebook update). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/yeson1tn
  48. Yes on 1 group says that some TN abortion clinics lack a license or inspection. (2014, September 9). Murfreesboro News and Radio. Retrieved from http://wgnsradio.com/yes-on-1-group-says-that-some-tn-abortion-clinics-lack-a-license-or-inspection-cms-22102

Copyright information

© Amy E. Jasperson, Charles Kelley Jr., and Kirby Bennett 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy E. Jasperson
  • Charles KelleyJr.
  • Kirby Bennett

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations