Abstract
Narratives have a dual function that both reflects and shapes who we are. Representing both the communicative and transformative nature of narrative, storytellers spin their tales as both fundamental expressions of individual and group identities and expressions of values (McAdams 2004). For example, love stories such as Romeo and Juliet, Odysseus and Penelope, and Cinderella and the Prince are enduring because they reflect our experiences and expectations of the passion, devotion, sacrifice, and tragedy that may accompany our love experiences. These stories also give clear (and well-studied) signals about how to shape identity, such as gender roles for men and women in relationships (e.g., Parsons 2004). Thus, such broad, culturally shared narratives function to represent our human experiences and identity, and they also work to influence and shape our beliefs and preferences through a compelling story.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods, Third edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crow, Deserai and John Berggren. 2014. “Using the Narrative Policy Framework to Understand Stakeholder Strategy and Effectiveness: A Multi-Case Analysis,” In Michael D. Jones, Elizabeth A. Shanahan, and Mark K. McBeth (eds.), The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Delahais, Thomas and Jacques Toulemonde. 2012. “Applying Contribution Analysis: Lessons from Five Years of Practice.” Evaluation 18(3):281–293.
Entman, Robert M. 1995. “Public Opinion and the Media: How the Media Affect What People Think—and Think They Think.” In Jan P. Vermeer (ed.), “Media” Res: Readings in Mass Media and American Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 55–59.
Jones, Michael D. 2014. “Cultural Characters and Climate Change: How Heroes Shape Our Perception of Climate Science.” Social Science Quarterly 95(1):1–39.
Jones, Michael D. and Geoboo Song. 2014. “Making Sense of Climate Change: How Story Frames Shape Cognition.” Political Psychology (forthcoming) doi: 10.1111/pops.12057.
Jones, Michael D., Mark K. McBeth, and Elizabeth A. Shanahan. 2014. “Introducing the Narrative Policy Framework.” in Michael D. Jones, Elizabeth A. Shanahan, and Mark K. McBeth (eds.), The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, Michael D. and Mark K. McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?” Policy Studies Journal 38(2): 329–353.
Jones, Michael D. 2010. Heroes and Villains: Cultural Narratives, Mass Opinion, and Climate Change. PhD diss., University of Oklahoma, Norman. http://works.bepress.com/mjones/6.
Lott, Dale F. 2002. American Bison: A Natural History. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Manning, Richard. 2008. Rewilding the West: Restoration in a Prairie Landscape. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
McAdams, Dan P. 2004. “The Redemptive Self: Narrative Identity in America Today.” In D. R. Beike, J. M. Lampien, and D. A. Behrend (eds.), The Self and Memory. New York: Psychology Press, 95–115
McBeth, Mark K., Michael D. Jones, and Elizabeth A. Shanahan. 2014. “The Narrative Policy Framework.” In Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher Weible (eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (Third edition). Boulder: Westview Press.
McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Molly Anderson, and Barbara Rose. 2012. “Policy Story or Gory Story? Narrative Policy Framework, YouTube, and Indirect Lobbying in Greater Yellowstone.” Policy & Internet 4(34):159–183.
McBeth, Mark K., Donna L. Lybecker, and Kacee A. Garner. 2010. “The Story of Good Citizenship: Framing Public Policy in the Context of Duty-based versus Engaged Citizenship.” Politics & Policy 38(1):1–23
McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Ruth J. Arnell, and Paul L. Hathaway. 2007. “The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory.” Policy Studies Journal 35(1):87–108.
McBeth, Mark K. and Elizabeth A. Shanahan. 2004. “Public Opinion for Sale: The Role of Policy Marketers in Greater Yellowstone Policy Conflict.” Policy Sciences 37:319–338.
Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act. 1960. http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/nfma/includes/musya60.pdf.
Noonan, Douglas S. 2008. “Evidence of Environmental Justice: A Critical Perspective on the Practice of EJ Research and Lessons for Policy Design.” Social Science Quarterly 89(5):1153–1174.
Parsons, Linda T. 2004. “Ella Evolving: Cinderella Stories and the Construction of Gender Appropriate Behavior.” Children’s Literature in Education 35(2):135–154.
Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster Books.
Rothstein, Bo. 2012. “The Reproduction of Gender Inequality in Sweden: A Casual Mechanism Approach.” Gender, Work, and Organization 19(3):324–344.
Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Michael D. Jones, Mark K. McBeth, and Ross R. Lane. 2013. “An Angel on the Wind: How Heroic Policy Narratives Shape Policy Realities.” Policy Studies Journal 41(3):453–483.
Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Michael D. Jones, and Mark K. McBeth. 2011a. “Policy Narratives and Policy Process.” Policy Studies Journal 39(3):535–561.
Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Mark K. McBeth, and Paul L. Hathaway. 2011b. “Narrative Policy Framework: The Influence of Media Policy Narratives on Public Opinion.” Politics & Policy 39(3):373–400.
Stone, Deborah A. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104(2):281–300.
Stone, Deborah. 2002. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W.W Norton & Company.
Stone, Deborah. 2012. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W.W Norton & Company.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.fws.gov/bisonrange/timeline.htm.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Michael D. Jones, Elizabeth A. Shanahan, and Mark K. McBeth
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shanahan, E.A., Adams, S.M., Jones, M.D., McBeth, M.K. (2014). The Blame Game: Narrative Persuasiveness of the Intentional Causal Mechanism. In: Jones, M.D., Shanahan, E.A., McBeth, M.K. (eds) The Science of Stories. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137485861_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137485861_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47521-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48586-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)