Abstract
In the last decade, the governance debate has moved from comparative institutional economics and politics to the law, where it has taken the shape of a new legal realism. However, the intellectual pedigree of the new governance semantics and the political-economic changes that it seeks to capture remain under-explored in the legal strand of the debate, which turns empirical arguments into normative arguments. This chapter exposes the unacknowledged slippage between the economic and political modes of analysis in the “law and (new) governance” debate, which ultimately serves to legitimise profound structural changes in the political economy. This hidden function of the governance discourse is exemplifed in the European political and legal context, which has been key to transforming national welfare regimes, which were once built upon a corporatist compromise.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Sabine Frerichs
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frerichs, S. (2015). Taking Governance to Court: Politics, Economics, and a New Legal Realism. In: Hartmann, E., Kjaer, P.F. (eds) The Evolution of Intermediary Institutions in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484529_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484529_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57541-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48452-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)
