Skip to main content

Marriage “Beyond the Pale”: “Mixed” Marriage, “Miscegenation,” and Assimilation

  • Chapter
  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

Marriage most obviously regulates and polices sex/gender boundaries and behaviors. Marriage is a focus for sex, gender, and sexuality studies, but until recently these rarely attended to the ways racism has figured in marriage law. However, a flurry of new research has begun to consider marriage’s recent and shamefully rich history as a mechanism for policing “race” and protecting white privilege.1 As a whole, such research aims to illustrate the particular threat interracial marriage has posed to racist societies. Until this upsurge of interest in marriage and racism, there were very few analyses of the intersection of racism and sexism in contemporary marriage. Instead, attention has been focused much more consistently on colonial times and Indigenous cultures, producing a number of fascinating and sometimes profound histories and ethnographies of marriage.2 The best of these endeavor to connect past and present, but too often the explicitly racist rules and prohibitions that shaped marriage before the late 1960s are presented as if they had no continuing effects—as if marriage’s racist past has been entirely undone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Richard Dyer’s (1997) work on representations of whiteness and Celia Daileader’s (2005) book exploring representations of interracial couples are especially interesting. Martha Nussbaum’s (1997) essay on Loving v. Virginia and the literary imagination is also particularly pertinent, as is Susan Courtney’s (2005) book.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a more complete account of Indigenous Australian women’s experience as drovers and drovers’ wives, see Ann McGrath’s celebrated Born In The Cattle (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paul Lombardo notes that the architects of Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act of 1924 (on which the proscription of the Lovings’ marriage rested) made similar claims: the white supremacist Anglo-Saxon Clubs of America organization insisted that it was “definitely and explicitly opposed to . . . racial prejudice” (Lombardo 1988, 429). Across both continents, then, we see what Peggy Pascoe (1996, 68) calls “an Alice-in-Wonderland interpretation of racism in which even those who argue for racially oppressive policies can adamantly deny being racists.”

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Heather Brook

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brook, H. (2007). Marriage “Beyond the Pale”: “Mixed” Marriage, “Miscegenation,” and Assimilation. In: Conjugal Rites. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137480910_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics