Skip to main content

Self-Identified and Observed Teaching Styles: A Case Study of Senior Physical Education Teachers in Queensland Schools

  • Chapter
Myths in Education, Learning and Teaching

Abstract

Teaching styles are valued by educators for what they can achieve. In undertaking research in the area of teaching styles, we set out to explore not only specific research questions but also some beliefs about what to expect of teachers, but as shall be discussed, these are ‘beliefs’ that modulate into ‘myths’. The findings of the study challenged the assumptions of the study questions and the ‘truth’ about teaching styles actually used by teachers. In recent times, curriculum documents by governments in places such as Scotland, England and Queensland (a state in Australia) have called for a range of teaching styles or approaches to meet the variety of learner differences and allow students to make more independent decision-making in physical education (Hardy & Mawer, 1999). Prior to 2005, no research had been conducted on the teaching styles that teachers of physical education use in Queensland, among this set of international priorities. Cothran et al. (2005) completed a study titled A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Use of Teaching Styles, which presented a questionnaire to teachers (including in Queensland) with scenarios of teaching styles based on the 11 styles identified by Mosston and Ashworth (2002). The study outlined here was designed to identify the teaching styles (based on the work of Mosston & Ashworth, 2002) that 110 teachers of Queensland Senior Physical Education believed they used and then sought to confirm the use of these teaching styles by observation of the lessons of nine volunteer participants across three of their lessons of Senior Physical Education in a unit of work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arti, Z. (1995). Muska Mosston symposium: Introduction. In R. Lidor, E. Eldar & I. Harari (Eds.), Bridging the gaps between disciplines, curriculum and instruction. Proceedings of the 1995 AISEP world congress. Israel: Wingate Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, S. (2008). Descriptions of landmark teaching styles: A spectrum inventory. United States. Retrieved from http://www.spectrumofteachingstyles.org/pdfs/literature/Ashworth2008_Descriptions_of_landmark.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, K., & Latin, R. (2004). Essentials of research methods in health, physical education, exercise science and recreation. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cothran, D., Kulinna, P., Banville, D., Choi, E., Amade-Escot, C., MacPhail, A., Macdonald, D., Richard, J., Sarmento, P., & Kirk, D. E. (2005). A cross-cultural investigation of the use of teaching styles. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(2), 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Mawer, M. (1999). Learning and teaching in physical education. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasty, D. (1997). The impact of British national curriculum physical education on teachers’ use of teaching styles. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, T., & Watt, A. (2011). ‘Finnish physical education teachers’ self-reported use and perceptions of Mosston and Ashworth’s teaching styles’. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(3), 248–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, M. W. (2005). Instructional models for physical education (2nd edn.). Arizona: Holcomb Hathaway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, D., & Kirk, D. (1998). Evaluation of the trial-pilot senior syllabus in physical education in Queensland secondary schools. Brisbane: Board of Senior Secondary School Studies Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2004). Senior physical education syllabus. Brisbane: QSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2009). Student assessment regimes: Getting the balance right for Australia. Draft Discussion Paper. Retrieved from http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/publications/qsa_paper_assess_balance_aust.pdf.

  • SueSee, B., Ashworth, S., & Edwards, K. (2006). Instrument for collecting teachers’ beliefs about their teaching styles used in physical education: Adaptation of description inventory of landmark teaching styles: A spectrum approach. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Brendan SueSee and Ken Edwards

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

SueSee, B., Edwards, K. (2015). Self-Identified and Observed Teaching Styles: A Case Study of Senior Physical Education Teachers in Queensland Schools. In: Harmes, M.K., Huijser, H., Danaher, P.A. (eds) Myths in Education, Learning and Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137476982_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics