Skip to main content

Demythologizing Teaching and Learning in Education: Towards a Research Agenda

  • Chapter
Myths in Education, Learning and Teaching

Abstract

Myths occupy an enduringly powerful position in teaching and learning objectives, in activities and in outcomes in contemporary education. Myths also generate a range of responses from education researchers: some researchers seek to challenge and transform persistent myths associated with disempowering stereotypes; some focus on interrogating myths understood as popular mis/conceptions about teaching and learning; and some researchers conceptualize teaching and learning as sets of powerful narratives and stories that evoke timely or timeless messages about current educational practice that need to be comprehended. Finally, myths can be productive learning tools in themselves, as they create (and sometimes recreate) narratives that are neatly wrapped around culturally based messages and ‘truths’. The following chapters interrogate assumptions upon which teaching in a variety of contexts is based, drawing together a rich array of perspectives and methodologies. Some chapters are based on scrupulous empirical research and others on the critically alert interpretation of theory. The chapters take up the idea of a ‘myth’ in different ways. Of course in any rationalist sense, anything ‘mythical’ is ‘untrue’, but arguably something mythic also crosses into areas of faith and belief. In some chapters, the authors argue that there is critical scrutiny of faith which is sometimes misplaced, in aspects of practice and scholarship and also in technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archetti, C. (2012). Friend or foe? Problem-based learning (PBL) in political communication. European Political Science, 11, 551–566. doi: 10.1057/eps.2011.40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balam, E. M., & Shannon, D. M. (2010). Student ratings of college teaching: A comparison of faculty and their students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J., & Devlin-Glass, F. (2010). Affect and narrative encoding: The problematics of representing and teaching Yanyuwa narratives in cyberspace. In T. Kayalis & A. Natsina (Eds.), Teaching literature at a distance: Open, online and blended learning (pp. 183–194). London, UK: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. (2013). Teaching social studies for newcomer English language learners: Toward culturally relevant pedagogy. Multicultural Perspectives, 15(1), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. (2011). A transformative perspective on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitch, N., & Soen, D. (2009). Myths and facts about student surveys of teaching: The links between students’ evaluations of faculty and course grades. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6(7), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2012). Can universities survive the digital revolution? Quadrant Online. Retrieved from http://www.quadrant.org.au/magazine/issue/2012/12/can-universities-survive-the-digital-revolution.

  • Davies, A., Fidler, D., & Gorbis, M. (2011). Future work skills 2020. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for the Future for the University of Phoenix Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, T. (2012). Undergraduate teaching and learning in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography, 36(3), 305–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deakin Crick, R. (2007). Learning how to learn: The dynamic assessment of learning power. The Curriculum Journal, 18(2), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drohan, S., Mauffette, Y., & Allard, J. (2011). Employers’ perspectives on problembased learning initiatives. In T. Barrett & S. Moore (Eds.), New approaches to problem-based learning: Revitalising your practice in higher education (pp. 87–99). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E. (1940). Mythology. New York: Mentor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Huijser, H. (2011). The power of problem-based learning in developing critical thinking skills: Preparing students for tomorrow’s digital futures in today’s classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitson, A., & Husbands, C., with Steward, S. (2011). Teaching & learning history 11–18: Understanding the past. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumashiro, K. K. (2009). Against common sense: Teaching and learning toward social justice (revised edn.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, M. S., Queirós, C., Teixeira, P. M., & Menezes, I. (2011). Development and validation of a theoretically based, multidimensional questionnaire of student evaluation of university teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 843–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majoor, G., & Aarts, H. (2010). A role for problem-based learning in higher education in the developing world. In H. Van Berkel, A. Scherpbier, H. Hillen, & C. van der Vleuten (Eds.), Lessons from problem-based learning (pp. 249–257). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, I., & Poikela, S. (2011). Evaluating problem-based learning initiatives. In T. Barrett & S. Moore (Eds.), New approaches to problem-based learning: Revitalising your practice in higher education (pp. 100–111). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, P., & Gunstone, R. (2012, August). Views about learning physics held by physics teachers with differing approaches to teaching physics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(5), 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the Net generation. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). Boulder, CO: Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dowd, M. (2012). Engaging non-indigenous students in indigenous history and ‘un-history’: An approach for non-indigenous teachers and a politics for the 21st century. History of Education Review, 41(2), 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, G. A. (2010). Teaching and learning history: A disciplined approach? Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(2), 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. E. (2010). Research-led teaching: Moving from a fractured engagement to a marriage of convenience. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sefa Dei, G. J. (2010). Teaching Africa: Towards a transgressive pedagogy (Explorations of educational purpose vol. 9). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2010). Teaching about indigenous forms of knowledge: Insights from non-indigenous teachers of visual arts education in New Zealand. In O. Kwo (Ed.), Teachers as learners: Critical discourse on challenges and opportunities (CERC Studies in comparative education vol. 26) (pp. 87–105). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 539–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, A. (2009, May 21–24). Ten years back and ten years forward: Developments and trends in higher education in the Europe region. Paper presented at the UNESCO forum on higher education in the Europe region, Bucharest, Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee, K. N. L., & Kek, Y. C. M. (2002). Authentic problem-based learning: Rewriting business education. Singapore: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmuda, A. (2010). Breaking free from myths about teaching and learning: Innovation as an engine for student success. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Marcus K. Harmes, Henk Huijser and Patrick Alan Danaher

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harmes, M.K., Huijser, H., Danaher, P.A. (2015). Demythologizing Teaching and Learning in Education: Towards a Research Agenda. In: Harmes, M.K., Huijser, H., Danaher, P.A. (eds) Myths in Education, Learning and Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137476982_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics