Skip to main content

A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Chapter
Port Management

Part of the book series: Palgrave Readers in Economics ((PRE))

Abstract

Over 20% of the world’s container traffic occurs from Asian ports. China’s entry into the market has stimulated this process significantly. Since China adopted a liberalized economic policy in the 1970s, its economy has grown at an average rate of 10% or more per annum. In particular, the efforts and investments that have been poured into its container ports are conspicuous because approximately 90% of the country’s international trade (by volume) is handled through maritime transport. However, Chinese ports (especially, container ports) face a number of problems such as bureaucratic administration, insufficient facilities, lack of service and commercial orientation, and inefficient operation. This study aims to identify the competitiveness of container ports in China, including Hong Kong, from an outsiders’ perspective by using the analytic hierarchy process framework and provide managerial and strategic implications. As expected, the fndings reveal that in terms of competitiveness, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Yantian rank first, second, and third, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Badri, M. (1999), Combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Goal Programming for Global Facility Location-Allocation Problem, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, M. (2002), An Analysis of Distributions of Priority Values from Alternative Comparison Scales within AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 140, pp. 104–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (2000), Sea Change in Liner Shipping: Regulation and Managerial Decision-Making in a Global Industry, Pergamon, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwolka, A. and Raith, M. (2001), Group Preference Aggregation with the AHP: Implications for Multiple-issue Agendas, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 132, pp. 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Containerisation International Yearbook (various years), Emap Business Communication Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Cullinane, S. and Wang, T. (2003), Container Terminal Development in Mainland China and its Impact on the Competitiveness of the Port of Hong Kong, Transport Reviews, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K. and Song, D.-W. (2001), The Administrative and Ownership Structure of Asian Container Ports, International Journal of Maritime Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewry Shipping Consultants (2002), Intra-Asia Container Trades: Dynamism Beyond Bounds, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, T. (1979), What’s Important in a Port, Distribution Worldwide, Vol. 78, No. 1, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, E. (1987), Port planning and Development, John Willy & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, E. (1992), Hierarchical Logic in Shipping Policy and Decision-Making, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, M.-S. and Zhang, L.-H. (2000), A Study on the Historical Developments of Chinese Ocean Shipping, The Journal of the Korean Association of Shipping Studies, Vol. 30, pp. 253–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralambides, H. and Veenstra, A. (1996), Ports as Trade Facilitators in the Export-led Growth Strategies of Developing Countries, in Valleri, M. (ed.), L’industria Portuale Per Uno Sviluppo Sostenibile Dei Porti, Cacucci Editore, Bari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralambides, H. and Yang, J. (2003), A Fuzzy Set Theory Approach to Flagging Out: Towards a New Chinese Shipping Policy, Marine Policy (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaver, T. (1995), The Implications of Increased Competition among Ports for Port Policy and Management, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2002), International Financial Statistics Yearbook, IMF, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. (2002), A Decision Support Model for the Liner Shipping Competition Policy Debate, Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists, Panama, 12–15 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchow, M. and Kanafani, A. (2001), A Disaggregate Analysis of Factors Influencing Port Selection, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1956), The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, Psychological Review, Vol. 63, pp. 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., Dalenberg, D. and Daley, J. (1988), A Contemporary Perspective on International Port Operations, Transportation Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., Daley, J. and Dalenberg, D. (1992), Port Selection Criteria: An Application of a Transportation Research Framework, Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R. and Ganesh, L. (1995), Using AHP for resource allocation problems, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 80, pp. 410–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T, Ma, F. and Blair, P. (1977), Operational Gaming for Energy Policy Analysis, Energy Policy, Vol. 5, pp. 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. (1980), Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. (1984), Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 234–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. (1985), The Analytic Planning, Pergamon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. and Vargas, L. (2001), Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. and Burstein, P. (1985), Basic Research Methods in Social Science, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, B. (1985), Containerisation, Inter-port Competition and Port Selection, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 297–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, G.-H., Teng, M.-H., Chen, J.-J. and Opricovic, S. (2002), Multicriteria Selection for a Restaurant Location in Taipei, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 21, pp. 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2002), Review of Maritime Transport, UNCTAD/RMT/2002, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, L. (1990), An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Applications, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, pp. 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedley, W., Choo, E. and Schoner, B. (2001), Magnitude Adjustment for AHP Benefit/Cost Ratios, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 133, pp. 342–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. (1965), The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 The Editor(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Song, DW., Yeo, GT. (2015). A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Haralambides, H.E. (eds) Port Management. Palgrave Readers in Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137475770_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics