Skip to main content
  • 435 Accesses

Abstract

Let me start by congratulating you on the existence of this group. Anything remotely connected to morality seems to be notably absent from neoclassical economics, as used by most academics and public servants, today. If one denies the possibility of intercomparisons of utility it is difficult to go past discussing the probable consequences of actions, to a consideration of whether those consequences are moral or even fair. In any case most neo-classical economists seem to be seized with a desire to make economics a positive science like physics. So instead of considering whether the consequences of economic policy actions are desirable from some moral point of view they concentrate on whether they are efficient and hide behind the concept of Pareto-optimum. A situation is said to be Pareto-optimum if no one can be made better off without making at least one person worse off.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Harris D. (1995), The Call to Justice, Albatross, Sutherland NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. (1943), “Political aspects of full employment”, The Political Quarterly, 14: 322–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesler P. and J.W. Nevile, (2011), “The global financial crisis and the right to a decent job”, Australian Journal of Human Rights, vol 16 no 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevile J.W. and Kriesler P. (2011), “Why Keynesian Policy was More Successful in the Fifties and Sixties than in the last 20 year”, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevile J.W. and Warren N. (1985) “Inflation and Personal Income Distribution in Australia”, Australian Economic Review, 1st Quarter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J.B. “A core of practical macroeconomics”, American Economic Review, Vol 87 no 2 pp. 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Joseph Halevi, G. C. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler and J. W. Nevile

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nevile, J.W. (2016). Just and Unjust Macro-economic Policy. In: Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Volume III: Essays on Ethics, Social Justice and Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137475329_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics