Abstract
In view of pragmatism’s undeniable success in various fields, from literary studies to law, the question inevitably arises: Why pragmatism? In other words, one wonders what exactly pragmatism has to offer. What is it good for? Seeking to answer this question, one can argue that one ought to see pragmatism as a worldly and oppositional criticism (somewhat in the Saidian sense). William James’s understanding of the worldliness of pragmatism is of the utmost importance in this context. In this chapter, I discuss James’s brand of pragmatism by focusing on its worldly aspects. This is done in two steps. First, I will analyze the worldliness of his version of radical empiricism and his function as a public philosopher. Second, I will complicate my results by underscoring that one might see James, together with Emerson and Whitman, as a strong poet who prepared for the establishment of a postmetaphysical literary or poeticized culture in the Rortyan sense. In other words, there are two intertwined narratives here. On the one hand, one possibility of framing the history of American pragmatism would be to argue that there is a connection between the Jamesian understanding of worldliness and Cornel West’s leftist version of neopragmatism as he developed it in The American Evasion of Philosophy and other texts. On the other hand, one might feel inclined to see a similarity between James and Rorty’s liberal brand of pragmatism insofar as both stress the importance of creative and innovative redescriptions offered by a strong individual or poet.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Particularly valuable in this context is Richard J. Bernstein, “The Ethical Consequences of William James’s Pragmatic Pluralism,” The Pragmatic Turn (Malden, MA: Polity, 2010), 53–69.
In this context, see Robert B. Westbrook, Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005), 52–73.
In addition, see James T. Kloppenberg, “James’s Pragmatism and American Culture, 1907–2007,” 100 Years of Pragmatism: William James’s Revolutionary Philosophy, ed. John J. Stuhr (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2010), 7–40.
In this context, see Ross Posnock, “The Influence of William James on American Culture,” The Cambridge Companion to William James, ed. Ruth Anna Putnam (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 322–42;
and Nancy Fraser, “Another Pragmatism: Alain Locke, Critical ‘Race’ Theory, and the Politics of Culture,” The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture, ed. Morris Dickstein (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998), 157–75.
For a critique of James’s political theorizing and public philosophizing, see Bruce Kuklick, A History of Philosophy in America, 1720–2000 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001), 167–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Ulf Schulenberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schulenberg, U. (2015). Poets, Partial Stories, and the Earth of Things: William James between Romanticism and Worldliness. In: Romanticism and Pragmatism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137474193_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137474193_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50149-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47419-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)