Skip to main content
  • 1392 Accesses

Abstract

To understand social movement outcomes, we investigate what those outcomes are. Saying that a campaign preceded policy change is not enough. We must show that the movement played a role in that policy change. Using the case of the climate change movement in the UK, specifically looking at the campaigns to create the Climate Change Act, stop the third runway at Heathrow, and establish the Green Investment Bank, I will explore which outcomes the campaigns were able to achieve. I do this by applying a counterfactual approach. A counterfactual approach asks ‘what if’ questions and uses data to provide a solid answer. Here we are asking the question, What would have happened to the policies if there were no social movement campaigns?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Eugene Nulman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nulman, E. (2015). Policy Outcomes. In: Climate Change and Social Movements. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468796_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics