High Arctic Stability as an Asset for Storms of International Politics — an Introduction

  • Lassi Heininen


In spite of the exploding Middle East, the ISIS’s and Israel’s aggressions, the Ukrainian war, the continuous fight against terror and all the manipulation and falsification, the international community is facing bigger challenges, such as worldwide nonmilitary human catastrophes (e.g., the Ebola virus); global environmental challenges (e.g., unavoidable global warming); holistic environmental degradation (e.g., the ‘Arctic Paradox’); structural societal problems of the global system (e.g., inequality between the elites and the masses), and going beyond the carrying capacity. This introduction argues that the globalized Arctic with high stability and keen international cooperation could be left out of all this and be interpreted as a human-made asset. It could act as a common ground to test soft ways of governance and alternative ways to definite security.


asset Cold War common ground global challenges international cooperation regional crises/wars stability the global Arctic 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmed, N. (2014) ‘NASA-Funded Study: Industrial Civilization Headed for “Irreversible Collapse”?’, Earth Insight, hosted by Guardian.Google Scholar
  2. Crowley, M. (2014) ‘The Never-Ending War’, TIME, September 22, 2014, 20–23.Google Scholar
  3. Fukuyama, F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man ( New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  4. Harle, V. (1991) Hyvä, Paha, Ystävä, Vihollinen ( Jyväskylä: Rauhankirjallisuuden edistämisseura ry and Rauhan- ja konfliktintutkimuslaitos).Google Scholar
  5. Heininen, L. (2005) ‘Impacts of Globalization, and the Circumpolar North in World Politics’, Polar Geography 29(2) (April–June), 91–102. Issue: Challenges of Globalization for the North.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heininen, L. (2010) ‘Pohjoiset alueet muutoksessa — geopoliittinen näkökulma’ (The High North in a Change — Geopolitical Point of View)’, Politiikka 1, 5–19.Google Scholar
  7. Heininen, L. (2014a) ‘The Achieved High Arctic Stability as an Asset for the Storms of International Politics’, BRE Review 5, 18–19.Google Scholar
  8. Heininen, L. (ed.) (2014b) Security and Sovereignty in the North Atlantic ( Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Palgrave Pivot ).Google Scholar
  9. Heininen, L. and C. Southcott (eds.) (2010) Globalization and the Circumpolar North ( Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press ).Google Scholar
  10. Heininen, L., H. Exner-Pirot and J. Plouffe (2014) ‘Introduction’, in L. Heininen, H. Exner-Pirot and J. Plouffe (eds.), The Arctic Yearbook 2014 — ‘Human Capital in the North, XX’ (Thematic Network on Geopolitics and Security, and Northern Research Forum — Scholar
  11. Heininen, L., A. Sergunin and G. Yarovoy (2014) Russian Strategies in the Arctic: Avoiding a New Cold War ( The Valdai International Discussion Club ). Online.Google Scholar
  12. Hoogensen Gjörv, G., D. R. Bazely, M. Goloviznina and A.J. Tanentzap (eds.) (2013) Environmental and Human Security in the Arctic ( Tonbridge, Kent: Routledge and Eartscan from Routledge ).Google Scholar
  13. Huebert, R. (2010) The Newly Emerging Arctic Security Environment. Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Klein, M. and M. Kaim (2014) ‘NATO-Russia Relations after the Newport Summit’, SWP Comments 41, October.Google Scholar
  15. Muhonen, T. (2014) ‘Ukraina Wikileaksin mukaan’, Voima 7, 24–26.Google Scholar
  16. North Atlantic Trety Organization (1989) NATO Handbook. An Alliance for the 1990’s ( Brussels: NATO Information Service).Google Scholar
  17. Palosaari, T. (2012) ‘The Amazing Race. On Resources, Conflict, and Cooperation in the Arctic’, in L. Heininen and R. Rouge-Oikarinen (eds), Nordia Geographical Publications Yearbook 2011. Theme issue on ‘Sustainable Development in the Arctic though peace and stability’, Oulu: Geographical Society of Northern Finland, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
  18. Rifkind, M. (2014) ‘NATO Faces Familiar Foe. The Western Military Alliance Must Stand Strong against Resurgent Russia’, TIME, August 25, 2014, 16.Google Scholar
  19. Sergunin, A. (2014) ‘Russian Views on the Ukrainian Crisis: From Confrontation to Damage Limitation’, in T. Flichy de la Neuville (ed.), UKRAINE Regards Sur Une Crise (Lausanne, Suisse: L’Age D’Homme ), pp. 55–82.Google Scholar
  20. TIME, August 4, 2014, Cover.Google Scholar
  21. TIME, August 25, 2014, Briefing, 5.Google Scholar
  22. Trenin, D. (2014). ‘Ukraine and the New Divide’, July 30, 2014,, date accessed September 2, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. Trenin, D. and A.S. Weiss (2013) ‘Dealing with the New Normal in U.S.-Russian Relations’, December 20, 2013,, date accessed July 7, 2014.Google Scholar
  24. Walsh, B. and A. Sifferlin (2014) ‘AFTER EBOLA. Why the Worst Outbreak Ever Is a Warning of What Could Come Next’, TIME, August 25, 2014.Google Scholar
  25. Wezeman, S. T. (2012) Military Capabilities in the Arctic ( SIPRI Background Paper, March 2012 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lassi Heininen 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lassi Heininen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations