Abstract
The Global Social Venture Competition (GSVC) is a collaborative effort between several institutions, including universities, companies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from around the world. Students and faculty from each of the participating universities meet for ten days in the host country, where they work in multidisciplinary teams to solve a case and present their solutions to a panel of judges. The pedagogy for GSVC relies on an intensive residential period, which includes a daily combination of faculty-led mentoring sessions, application exercises, breakout sessions, discussion, site visits, project-based learning, service learning and professional presentations. Students are expected to commit 10–12 hours per day in a highly competitive and demanding environment. It promotes organic learning through an immersion experience. In order to solve a local (foreign) social problem, students must understand different political, economic, legal and cultural issues that frame social problems; how to identify them separately; and develop a business solution. GSVC is an excellent example of experiential learning in international business (IB) and/or social entrepreneurship based on the community enquiry model that this chapter develops and proposes. Community enquiry addresses the limitations of the typical service learning model. The traditional service learning model brings students and civil organizations together, but it has rigid boundaries that define who is serving and who is served.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Allan, R. F. (1994). Hard biscuits: Motivation to learn in secondary school social studies. International Journal of Social Education, 9: 67–77.
Bell, R., Furco, A., Ammon, M. S., Muller, P. & Sorgen, V. (2000). Institutionalizing servicelearning in higher education: Findings from a study of the Western Region Campus Compact Consortium. Berkeley: University of California.
Berends, P., Glunk, U. & Wüster, J. (2008). Personal mastery in management education: A case description of personal development trajectory in graduate education. In Barsky, N. P., Clements, M., Ravn, J. & Smith, K. (Eds.) Advances in business education. Berlin: Springer, pp. 117–129.
Bishop, A. P., Bruce, B. C. & Jeong, S. (2009). Beyond service learning: Toward community schools and reflective community learners. In Roy, L. J. K. & Meyers, A. H (Eds.) Service learning: Linking library education and practice. Chicago: ALA Editions, pp. 16–31.
Boyer, E. L. (1996). The schorarship or engagement. The Journal or Public Service and Outreach, 1(1): 11–20.
Brock, D. D. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: Teaching resources handbook. Alexandria, VA: Ashoka’s Global Academy for Social Entrepreneurship.
Brock, D. D., Steiner, S. & Kim, M. (2008). Social entrepreneurship education: Is it achieving the desired aims? USASBE 2008 Proceedings, 832.
Bruce, B. C. & Davidson, J. (1996). An inquiry model for literacy across the curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28: 281–300.
Byer, J. L. (2002). The consistency correlation between students’ perceptions of classroom involvement and academic self-concept in secondary social studies classes. Journal of Social Studies Research, 26(1): 3–11.
Clapp, E. R. (1971). Community schools in action. New York: Arno.
Compact, C. (2007). Campus compact annual membership survey. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
Cook, S. D. N. & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4): 381–400.
Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4): 411–424.
Dewey, J. (1907). The school and society: Being three lectures by John Dewey supplemented by a statement of the University Elementary School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.
Dewey, J. (Ed.) (1981). The need for a recovery of philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Diggins, J. P. (1994). The promise of pragmatism: Modernism and the crisis of knowledge and authority. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Elkjaer, B. (2004). Organizational learning — The ‘third way’. Management Learning, 35(4): 419–434, doi: 10.1177/1350507604048271.
Evans, K. G. (2000). Reclaiming John Dewey: Democracy, inquiry, pragmatism, and public management. Administration & Society, 32(3): 308–328.
Eyler, J. & Giles, D. E., Jr. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Furco, A. (2001). Advancing service learning at research universities. In Canada, M. & Speck, B. W. (Eds.) Developing and implementing service-learning programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 67–78.
Goldkuhl, G. (9–11 June 2008). Practical inquiry as action research and beyond. Paper presented at the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, Galway, Ireland.
Greene, M. (1997). Teaching as possibility: A light in dark times. Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.lesley.edu/journals/jppp/1/jp3ii1.html.
Grenier, P. (Ed.) (2006). Social entrepreneurship: Agency in a globalizing world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research. (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Hickman, L. A. (1990). John Dewey & s pragmatic technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hult, M. & Lennung, S. (1980). Towards a definition of action research: A note and bibilography. Journal of Management Studies, 17(2): 242–250.
Jacoby, B. (1996). Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jones, C. & English, J. (2004). A contemporary approach to entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 46: 416–423.
Kenworthy-U’Ren, A. L. & Peterson, T. O. (2005). Service-learning and management education: Introducing the ‘WE CARE’ approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(3): 272–277.
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M. & Pitelis, C. N. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7: 1–15.
Kozinets, R. V., Hemetsberger, A. & Schau, H. J. (2008). The wisdom of consumer crowds collective innovation in the age of networked marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4): 339–354, doi:10.1177/0276146708325382.
Kuratko, D. F. (2004). Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, and practice. (6th edition). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Lave, J. W., Etienne. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lingane, A. & Olsen, S. (2004). Guidelines for social return on investment. California Management Review, 46(3): 116–135.
Mintzberg, H. (2005). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Nonaka, I. (2007). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 85(7–8): 162–171.
Papamarcos, S. D. (2005). Giving traction to management theory: Today’s servicelearning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(3): 325–335.
Rapoport, R. N. (1970). Three dilemmas in action research. Human Relations, 23(6): 499–513.
Reardon, K. M. (1998). Participatory action research as service learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 73: 57–64.
Schneider, M. T. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. American Political Science Review, 86: 737–747.
Shields, P. M. (1996). Pragmatism: Exploring a public administration’s policy imprint. Administration & Society, 28(3): 390–411.
Shockley, G., Frank, P. & Stough, R. (2002). Toward a theory ofpublic sector entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the NCIIA 7th Annual Meeting: Big Ideas in a Small World, Boston, MA.
Solomon, G. T., Duffy, S. & Tarabishy, A. (2002). The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1): 65–86.
Steiner, S. D. & Watson, M. A. (2006). The service learning component in business education: The values linkage void. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4): 422–434.
Stivers, C. (1990). The public agency as polis — Active citizenship in the administrative state. Administration & Society, 22(1): 86–105.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Sunny Jeong
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeong, S. (2015). Global Knowledge to Local Practice: Experiential Service Learning Model in International Business and Social Entrepreneurship Education. In: Taras, V., Gonzalez-Perez, M.A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Experiential Learning in International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467720_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467720_21
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50005-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46772-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)