Advertisement

Gradual Processes, Ambiguous Consequences: Rethinking Recognition in International Relations

  • Anna Geis
  • Caroline Fehl
  • Christopher Daase
  • Georgios Kolliarakis
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series book series (PSIR)

Abstract

‘Recognition’, or its negative counterpart, ‘misrecognition’, is relevant wherever people or their collective organizations interact—or fail to interact. Individuals and collective political actors seek recognition of certain qualities, positive characteristics, competencies, achievements, or of their status within a specific group of people, a society, a political system, or the international political realm. The addressees of this recognition-seeking behaviour vary broadly, depending on the respective situation and depending on what exactly one actor would like to see recognized by another. A child might seek recognition from her parents or from fellow children of her first colour painting; a scholar might seek recognition of her opus magnum from fellow scholars or the public. A non-governmental organization might seek recognition of its humanitarian work from governments, the UN, potential donors, or from the needy people it supports. The violent group ‘Islamic State’ might seek recognition of its self-proclaimed ‘caliphate’ from Muslim believers, Muslim leaders, or regional organizations. Even a superficial scan of the daily news shows the ubiquity of issues related to ‘recognition’ in politics and society. Yet, what a certain actor seeks recognition of and from whom, how exactly recognition comes about (or fails to come about), and how it can be ‘measured’ is not as self-evident.

Keywords

International Relation Gradual Process International Politics Ambiguous Consequence Violent Conflict 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agné, H., J. Bartelson, E. Erman, T. Lindemann, B. Herborth, O. Kessler, C. Chwaszcza, M. Fabry, and S. D. Krasner (2013) ‘Symposium: The Politics of International Recognition’, International Theory, 5:1, 94–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, P. and A. Keller (2012) ‘Is a Just Peace Possible without Thin and Thick Recognition?’, in T. Lindemann and E. Ringmar (eds), The International Politics of Recognition (Boulder, CO: Paradigm), 71–86.Google Scholar
  3. Bahceli, T., B. Bartmann, and H. Srebnik (eds) (2004) De facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  4. Bartelson, J. (2013) ‘Three Concepts of Recognition’, International Theory, 5:1, 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behnke, A. (2012) NATO’s Security Discourse after the Cold War: Representing the West (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  6. Benhabib, S. (2002) The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  8. Caspersen, N. (2012) Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System (Cambridge, MA: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  9. Caspersen, N. and G. Stansfield (eds) (2011) Unrecognized States in the International System (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  10. Clark, I. (2007) Legitimacy in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke, M. (1997) ‘Authenticity and Autonomy: Taylor, Habermas, and the Politics of Recognition’, Political Theory, 25:2, 258–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawford, J. (2006) The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  13. Cronin, A. K. (2011) How Terrorism Ends: Understanding the Decline and Demise of Terrorist Campaigns (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  14. Dimitrova, A. (2013) ‘The Politics of Recognition in International Conflicts’, Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 41:3, 663–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunne, T., M. Kurki, and S. Smith (eds) (2013) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Erman, E. (2013) ‘The Recognitive Practices of Declaring and Constituting Statehood’, International Theory, 5:1, 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fabry, M. (2010) Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States Since 1776 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fraser, N. (1996) ‘Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation’, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, delivered at Stanford University, United States (30 April–2 May).Google Scholar
  19. Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  20. Fraser, N. (2000) ‘Rethinking Recognition’, New Left Review, 3, 107–20.Google Scholar
  21. Fraser, N. and A. Honneth (2003) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  22. Geldenhuys, D. (2009) Contested States in World Politics (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant, T. D. (1999) The Recognition of States: Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution (Westport, CT: Praeger).Google Scholar
  24. Greenhill, B. (2008) ‘Recognition and Collective Identity Formation in International Politics’, European Journal of International Law, 14:2, 343–68.Google Scholar
  25. Haacke, J. (2005) ‘The Frankfurt School and International Relations: On the Centrality of Recognition’, Review of International Studies, 31, 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heins, V. (2008) Nongovernmental Organizations in International Society: Struggles over Recognition (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hitzel-Cassagnes, T. and R. Schmalz-Bruns (2009) Recognition and Political Theory. Paradoxes and Conceptual Challenges of the Politics of Recognition, RECON Online Working Paper 11/2009, http://www.reconproject.eu/projectweb/portalproject/ RECONWorkingPapers2009.html, date accessed 8 September 2014.Google Scholar
  28. Honneth, A. (1995) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (London: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  29. Honneth, A. (2010) Das Ich im Wir. Studien zur Anerkennungstheorie (Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
  30. Honneth, A. (2012) ‘Recognition between States: On the Moral Substrate of International Relations’, in T. Lindemann and E. Ringmar (eds), The International Politics of Recognition (Boulder, CO: Paradigm), 25–37.Google Scholar
  31. Ikäheimo, H. (2002) ‘On the Genus and Species of Recognition’, Inquiry, 45:4, 447–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Iser, M. (2008) Empörung und Fortschritt. Grundlagen einer kritischen Theorie der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt a. M.: Campus).Google Scholar
  33. Kelsen, H. (1941) ‘Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations’, American Journal of International Law, 35:4, 605–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ker-Lindsay, J. (2012) The Foreign Policy of Counter Secession: Preventing the Recognition of Contested States (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kessler, O. and B. Herborth (2013) ‘Recognition and the Constitution of Social Order’, International Theory, 5:1, 155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kolstø, P. (2006) ‘The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States’, Journal of Peace Research, 43:6, 723–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lebow, R. N. (2008) Cultural Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindemann, T. (2010) Causes of War: The Struggle for Recognition (London: ECPR Press).Google Scholar
  39. Lindemann, T. (2012) ‘Concluding Remarks on the Empirical Study of International Recognition’, in T. Lindemann and E. Ringmar (eds), The International Politics of Recognition (Boulder, CO: Paradigm), 209–25.Google Scholar
  40. Lindemann, T. and E. Ringmar (eds) (2012) The International Politics of Recognition (Boulder, CO: Paradigm).Google Scholar
  41. Markell, P. (2003) Bound by Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  42. Menon, P. K. (1989) ‘Some Aspects of the Law of Recognition. Part I: Theories of Recognition’, Revue de Droit International/The International Law Review, 67, 161–82.Google Scholar
  43. O’Neill, S. and N. H. Smith (eds) (2012) Recognition Theory as Social Research: Investigating the Dynamics of Social Conflict (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  44. Onuf, N. (2013) ‘Recognition and the Constitution of Epochal Change’, International Relations, 27:2, 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Popovski, V. and N. Turner (2012) ‘Conclusion: Legitimacy as Complement and Corrective to Legality’, in R. Falk, M. Juergensmeyer, and V. Popovski (eds), Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 439–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reus-Smit, C. (2011) ‘Struggles for Individual Rights and the Expansion of the International System’, International Organization, 65:2, 207–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ringmar, E. (1996) Identity, Interest, and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ringmar, E. (2002) ‘The Recognition Game: Soviet Russia against the West’, Cooperation & Conflict, 37:2, 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ringmar, E. (2012) ‘Introduction: The International Politics of Recognition’, in T. Lindemann and E. Ringmar (eds), The International Politics of Recognition (Boulder, CO: Paradigm), 3–23.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, N. H. (2012) ‘Introduction: A Recognition-Theoretical Research Programme for the Social Sciences’, in S. O’Neill and N. H. Smith (eds), Recognition Theory as Social Research: Investigating the Dynamics of Social Conflict (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 1–18.Google Scholar
  51. Strömbom, L. (2013) Israeli Identity, Thick Recognition and Conflict Transformation (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strömbom, L. (2014) ‘Thick Recognition: Advancing Theory on Identity Change in Intractable Conflicts’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:1, 168–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor, C. (1992) Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, C. (2001) ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 25–73.Google Scholar
  55. Toros, H. (2012) Terrorism, Talking and Transformation: A Critical Approach (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
  56. Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wendt, A. (2003) ‘Why a World State Is Inevitable’, European Journal of International Relations, 9:4, 491–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wendt, A. (2004) ‘The State as Person in International Theory’, Review of International Studies, 30:2, 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams, M. C. (2001) ‘The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities’, European Journal of International Relations, 7:4, 525–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolf, R. (2011) ‘Respect and Disrespect in International Politics: The Significance of Status Recognition’, International Theory, 3:1, 105–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Young, I. M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anna Geis, Caroline Fehl, Christopher Daase, and Georgios Kolliarakis 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Geis
  • Caroline Fehl
  • Christopher Daase
  • Georgios Kolliarakis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations