Skip to main content

Indivisible Human Rights and the End(s) of the State

  • Chapter
  • 883 Accesses

Part of the book series: Global Issues Series ((GLOISS))

Abstract

The rhetoric of indivisible human rights has a long history, dating back at least to the initial division of the draft International Covenant on Human Rights into separate treaties in the early 1950s. Prior to that, there was no need to speak of the relationship between the two ‘grand categories’ of human rights as being ‘indivisible’ — the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes both sets of rights, and all of the influential antecedents of the Universal Declaration had included a catalogue of key economic and social rights alongside ‘traditional’ civil and political rights. But the Declaration, by its very nature, was void of legally binding obligations or measures of implementation. When the time came to translate its principles into binding treaty law, divisions emerged over the different obligations that were deemed appropriate for the realization of the two sets of rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, P. and Quinn, G. (1987) ‘The Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 9, 156–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Law Institute (1946) ‘Statement of Essential Human Rights’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 243, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. (1995) ‘What Future for Economic and Social Rights?’ Political Studies 43, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. (1996) ‘A “Violations Approach” for Monitoring the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 18, 23–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dankwa, V., Flinterman, C. and Leckie, S. (1998) ‘Commentary to the Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 20, 705–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J. (2003) Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, 2nd edn (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J. (2008) ‘Human Rights and Social Provision’ Journal of Human Rights 7, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1957) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals, translated by Cornelia Brookfield, revised edn (New York: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1967) Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, translated by T.M. Knox (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbins, A. J. (1996) On the Edge of Greatness: The Diaries of John Humphrey, First Director of the United Nations Division of Human Rights (Montreal: McGill University Libraries).

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J. P. (1984) Human Rights and the United Nations: A Great Adventure (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers, Inc).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission of Jurists (1998) ‘The Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 20, 691–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, C. W. (1946) ‘The Five Economic and Social Rights’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 243, 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, H. (1967) Pure Theory of Law (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckie, S. (1998) ‘Another Step towards Indivisibility: Identifying the Key Features of Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 20, 81–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. P. (1998) Subjectivity in Political Economy: Essays on Wanting and Choosing (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. P. (2001) Normative Political Economy: Subjective Freedom, the Market, and the State (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. P. (2004) ‘Poverty, Capabilities, and Freedom’ Review of Political Economy 16, 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. P. (2008) Welfare, Right, and the State: A Framework for Thinking (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. D. (1946) ‘Human Rights in England and the United States’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 243, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690) Second Treatise of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C. E. (1946) ‘The Content of an International Bill of Rights’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 243, 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, J. (2007) Making Sense of Human Rights, 2nd edn (Malden, MA: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. (2008) World Poverty and Human Rights, 2nd edn (Malden, MA: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, F. D. (1950) ‘Unless There Is Security Here at Home, There Cannot Be Lasting Peace in the World’ — Message to the Congress on the State of the Union, 11 January 1944, in The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32–42 (New York: Harper & Brothers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, L. B. (1995) ‘How American International Lawyers Prepared for the San Francisco Bill of Rights’ American Journal of International Law 89, 540–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahn, C. (2007) ‘Responsibilty to Protect: Political or Emerging Legal Norm?’ American Journal of International Law 101, 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2004) The Second Bill of Rights: Fdr’s Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More Than Ever (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States National Resources Planning Board (1942) National Resources Development Report for 1942 (Washington DC: National Resources Planning Board).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, D. J. (2008) ‘A Violations Approach to Economic, Social and Cultural Rights — The Perspective of History’ Paper delivered at the International Studies Association Annual Conference (San Francisco: CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, D. J. (2010) Indivisible Human Rights: A History (Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Daniel J. Whelan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whelan, D.J. (2015). Indivisible Human Rights and the End(s) of the State. In: Mills, K., Karp, D.J. (eds) Human Rights Protection in Global Politics. Global Issues Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137463173_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics