Abstract
This book has argued that robust peacekeeping works better than traditional peacekeeping in protecting civilians from killings, because by its designation, it constitutes a formidable barrier to human rights violations. The formidable barrier model posits that the success of UN peacekeeping missions in staving off deliberate civilian killings is a function of their deterrent capacity. Therefore, such missions’ success is a direct function of their ability to constrain combatants’ violent behavior, resulting in a cost-benefit calculation by the combatants that leads to the choice of peace over continued fighting and civilian killings. In this sense, the mission’s capacity to raise the cost of continued fighting by combatants is dependent on the superiority of its capabilities over those of the combatants. A stronger mission force in terms of large force size, stronger firepower reflected in its robust rules of engagement, and stronger combative and repulsive capacities may alter the calculations of combatants and spoilers to choosing peace over continued fighting and killing of civilians. Robust peacekeeping, by designation, has the ability to manipulate the relative costs of continued fighting and civilian killings and the benefits of peace to have more preferable effects. Robust peacekeeping missions, characterized by greater force strength, use of heavy weapons, major power participation, rules of engagement to use “necessary means” to protect civilians as well as for self-defense, and a high cost-tolerance level can put up the necessary barrier or impediment to intentional civilian killings by combatants and spoilers. The underlying strategy of robust peacekeeping is to alter the parties’ calculations so as to make it too costly to fight and more beneficial to choose peace.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Alan Bullion. 2004. “India in Sierra Leone: A Case of Muscular Peacekeeping?” International Peacekeeping 8(4): 77–91.
See Michael W. Doyle and Nicholas Sambanis. 2000. “International Peacebuilding: A Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 94(4): 779, 801
Virgina Page Fortna. 2004. “Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace After Civil War.” International Studies Quarterly 48: 269, 292.
United Nations. 2008b. United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Principles and Guidelines. New York: United Nations.
Stian Kjeksrud. 2009. “Matching Robust Ambitions with Robust Action in Operations - Towards A Conceptual Overstretch?” (A Report). Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) April 20. 29
Gowan Richard and Benjamin Tortolani. 2008. “Robust Peacekeeping and Its Limitations.” In Center on International Cooperation, Robust Peacekeeping: The Politics of Force, New York.
Victoria Holt and Glyn Taylor with Max Kelly. 2009. Protecting Civilians in the Context of UN Peacekeeping Operations: Successes, Setbacks and Remaining Challenges, Independent Study Commissioned by DPKO and OCHA. New York: United Nations, 4.
Richard Connaughton. 2001. Military Intervention and Peacekeeping: The Reality. London: Ashgate Publishing, 19.
W. J. Durch, ed. 2006. Twenty-First Century Peace Operations. Washington, DC: United Institute of Peace, 582.
Jones Bruce, Richard Gowan and Jake Sherman, 2009, “Excerpts from Building on Brahimi: Peacekeeping in an Era of Strategic Uncertainty” In Robust Peacekeeping: The Politics of Force, New York, US: Center on International Cooperation, New York University, 34.
United Nations. 2000. The Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations. New York: United Nations A/55/305-S/2000/809.
Jones Bruce, Richard Gowan and Jake Sherman, 2009, “Excerpts from Building on Brahimi: Peacekeeping in an Era of Strategic Uncertainty” In Robust Peacekeeping: The Politics of Force, New York, US: Center on International Cooperation, New York University, 35.
George Archibald. 1998. Al, “UN Officials Wasted Millions on Supplies: Corruption Flourished under Annan’s Watch.” Washington Times, May 29: Al.
Guéhenno, Jean-Marie, 2009 “Robust Peacekeeping: Building Political Consensus and Strengthening Command and Control” In Robust Peacekeeping: The Politics of Force, New York, US: Center on International Cooperation, New York University.
Francis Fukuyama. 2004. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 92.
Kofi Nsia-Pepra. 2014. “Militarization of US Foreign Policy in Africa-Strategic Gain or Backlash?” Military Review January-February: 10.
Johan Pottier. 2002. Re-Imagining Rwanda: Conflict, Survival and Disinformation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 39.
Pottier. 2002. Re-Imagining Rwanda: Conflict, Survival and Disinformation in the Late Twentieth Century.
Victoria K. Holt and Glyn Taylor with Max Kelly. 2009. “Protecting civilians in the context of UN peacekeeping operations: Successes, Setbacks and Remaining Challenges” Independent study jointly commissioned by the Department of Peacekeeping Operations and the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, 7.
Cooper Richard H. and Juliette Voinov Kohler, 2009, “The Responsibility to Protect, The Opportunity to Relegate Atrocity Crimes to the Past” In, Responsibility to Protect The Global Moral Compact of the 21st Century, Richard H Cooper and Julette Voinov Kohler eds, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Donald Puchala, Kate Verlin Laatikanen and Roger A. Coate. 2007. United Nations Politics, International Organization in a Divided World, In Search of Leadership. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Leslie H. Gelb. 2009. “The World Still Needs A Leader.” Current History November, 108(721): 387–389, 387.
Time Magazine, October 18, 1999, cited in Richard Connaughton. 2001. Military Intervention and Peacekeeping: The Reality. London: Ashgate, 59.
Copyright information
© 2014 Kofi Nsia-Pepra
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nsia-Pepra, K. (2014). Moving Forward: UN Robust Peacekeeping and Civilian Protection in Civil Wars. In: UN Robust Peacekeeping. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137463135_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137463135_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-67966-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46313-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)