Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance ((PSHF))

  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

What then has emerged from the preceding discussion? How does this investigation and analysis develop existing scholarship? What remains to be thought about and fought over?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. David Lindsey, Athanasios Orphanides and Robert Rasche, ‘The Reform of October 1979: How It Happened and Why’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, March/April, Part 2 (2005) pp. 187–235.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Michael Moran, The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation (Oxford, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. See Michael Power, Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford, 1999).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Onora O’Neill, A Question of Trust (Cambridge, 2002), esp. pp. 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, M.J. Artis, and M.K. Lewis, ‘Inflation in the United Kingdom’ in V.E. Argy, and J.W. Nevile (eds) Inflation and Unemployment: Theory, Experience and Policy-making (London, 1985) pp. 200–220, at p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century (London, 2014, English translation): see, for example, pp. 26, 42, 98.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. At the General Election the swing was 5.2 per cent and the margin of victory over Labour 6.9 per cent: see generally, David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh, The British General Election of 1979 (London, 1980) Appendix 1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. John Kirk, Class, Culture and Social Change: On the Trail of the Working Class (Basingstoke, 2007) p. 55, discussing Stuart Hall’s views on Thatcherism.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Their share of the vote (43.9 per cent) was less than in 1970, for example (46.4 per cent): see Butler and Kavanagh, The British General Election of 1979, Appendix 1 and David Butler and Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, The British General Election of 1970 (London, 1971) p. 353.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. See ibid. p. 402; David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh, The British General Election of October 1974 (London, 1975) pp. 350/351;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. David Butler and Donald Stokes, Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Choice (2nd edn, London, 1974) pp. 206–208.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Ivor Crewe, ‘Has the Electorate become more Thatcherite?’ in R. Skidelsky (ed.) Thatcherism (London, 1988) p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Mike Savage, Class Analysis and Social Transformation (Buckingham, 2000) pp. 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fiona Devine, Affluent Workers Revisited: Privatism and the Working Class (Edinburgh, 1992) pp. 2/3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gordon Marshall et al. Social Class in Modern Britain (London, 1988) pp. 206, 267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Adrian Williamson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williamson, A. (2015). Conclusion. In: Conservative Economic Policymaking and the Birth of Thatcherism, 1964–1979. Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137460264_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics