Advertisement

Roman Catholic View of the State

  • Denis Dragovic
Chapter
  • 68 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict book series (PSCAC)

Abstract

Earlier I outlined the mechanisms that religious institutions have at hand to support the three primary order elements of post-conflict statebuilding—legitimacy, public security and basic services. These contributions are important as they target what political scientists and international relations scholars have identified as being the two most common mechanisms by which states fail—legitimacy deficit and institutional failure. Scholars that have more broadly considered the relationship between religion and legitimacy have largely done so within the confines of political science. Social science, meanwhile, offers theories that can be used to consider how religious institutions mobilize resources to respond to public security and deliver basic services. Both disciplines lead to an approach that instrumentalizes religion—making it a tool, or a means to a statebuilding end. In this section I reflect on how our understanding of post-conflict statebuilding would change if the means and ends were reversed, in other words, that statebuilding becomes a means to a religious end. So rather than seeing statebuilding as, for example, Khadiagala does, namely for the purpose of ‘returning the state to the centre of political life’,1 I will consider religion as being the aspirational centre of people’s lives and statebuilding as the means to achieving a religious end.

Keywords

Public Security Religious Institution Social Doctrine Vatican Council Practised Theology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    See for example, Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes, eds., Rationality and Relativism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Alasdair C. MacIntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (London: Duckworth, 1988). 349.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Nukhet A. Sandal and Jonathan Fox, Religion in International Relations Theory: Interactions and Possibilities (New York: Routledge, 2013). 9.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    W. Richard Scott, “The Adolescence of Institutional Theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly 32 (1987): 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 6.
    Pope Paul VI, Octogesima adveniens (1971). No. 4.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Pope Benedict XVI, Deus caritas est (2005). No. 27.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Pope John Paul II, Sollicitudo rei socialis (1987). No. 8.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Hastings notes the evolving terminology of conciliar documents concluding that there is little implied difference between constitutions, decrees or declarations. See Adrian Hastings, A Concise Guide to the Documents of the Second Vatican Council. Vol. 1 (Darton: Longman & Todd, 1968) 22.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Quoted in Charles E. Curran, Catholic Social Teaching, 1891-Present: A Historical, Theological, and Ethical Analysis (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002) 28.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Pope Leo XIII, Immortale dei (1885). No. 17.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    Quoted in Leslie Griffin, “The Integration of Spiritual and Temporal: Contemporary Roman Catholic Church-State Theory,” Theological Studies 48, no. 2 (1987): 230–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 16.
    José Casanova, “Globalizing Catholicism and the Return to a ‘Universal’ Church.” In Transnational Religion and Fading States (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    A papal position of neutrality re-emerged in the early nineteenth century and by the First World War became what was referred to as ‘absolute impartiality’. Through such a view public moral determinations on justice between warring states was eschewed as it was seen as a breach of neutrality. See Charles R. Gallagher, “The Perils of Perception: British Catholics and Papal Neutrality, 1914–1923.” In The Papacy Since 1500: From Italian Prince to Universal Pastor, ed. James Corkery and Thomas Worcester (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    Giuseppe Alberigo and Joseph A. Komonchak, History of Vatican II. Vol. 1: Announcing and Preparing Vatican Council II Toward a New Era in Catholicism, Vol. 1 (Maryknoll, NY: Leuven: Orbis: Peeters, 1995), book. 296.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    José Casanova, “Secularization Revisited: A Reply to Talal Asad.” In Powers of the Secular Modem: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006), 26. Casanova defines the shift as from a ‘state-oriented to a civil society—oriented institution’.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    Samuel P. Huntington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, The Julian J. Rothbaum distinguished lecture series (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    Pope Paul VI, Populorum progressio (1967). No. 13.Google Scholar
  18. 23.
    Pope Benedict XVI, Caritas in veritate (2009). No. 41.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    In Pope Paul VI’s Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii nuntiandi he warns the Church of the temptation to ‘reduce her mission to the dimensions of a simply temporal project’. If this were to occur the Church’s initiatives would be driven by the political and social order, open to monopolization and manipulation. This is why the Church must not forget the full theological meaning of its message. Pope Paul VI, Evangelii Nuntiandi (1975) no. 32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Denis Dragovic 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denis Dragovic
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations