Abstract
This chapter compares and contrasts Risk Management (RM) with Crisis Management (CM). RM aims to calculate the expected damage that crises inflict. To do this, RM multiplies the likelihood of a crisis by its consequences measured in dollars, injuries, and so on. It then ranks crises in terms of their expected damage, and ignores crises that are below a certain cut-off level. Inevitably, RM neglects disasters that are extremely low in probability but high in consequences such as 9/11. CM acknowledges not only the existence of deep assumptions that prevent serious planning for crises, but surfaces such assumptions so that we can confront and overcome them. For CM, the least likely crises are precisely the ones that are most likely to do the worst damage. In effect, CM is the Management of Key Assumptions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Ian I. Mitroff and Can M. Alpaslan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitroff, I.I., Alpaslan, C.M. (2014). The Risks of Risk Management. In: The Crisis-Prone Society: A Brief Guide to Managing the Beliefs that Drive Risk in Business. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454836_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454836_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49819-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45483-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)