Skip to main content

Benefits Analysis—A Robust Assessment Approach

  • Chapter
  • 263 Accesses

Part of the book series: The OR Essentials series ((ORESS))

Abstract

Benefits Analysis has been evolving over the past decade from roots in multi-criteria analysis, causal mapping and multi-methodology. It has now reached a level of maturity such that it deserves to be treated as a method in its own right, and this paper seeks to document the method and provide guidance on its use. Benefits Analysis is a systematic method for formulating complex, multi-factor investment appraisal problems where decision-makers seek to realize non-financial benefits. Such decision problems abound in military OR, particularly the management of equipment capability and research. Benefits Analysis connects qualitative and quantitative OR methods and facilitates robust assessment, including multi-methodology. This paper describes the principles of Benefits Analysis and discusses its application to a variety of real problems, including research management, capability management, balance of investment, business case development and benefit quantification strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mathieson G (2001). Best practice for using assessment hierarchies in operational analysis—principles and practical experiences. OR Insight 14: 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwin P and Wright G (1999). Decision Analysis for Management Judgement, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marland P and Montgomery J (1996). CIS Effectiveness in a Strategic Planning Context, Second International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, Market Bosworth, Warwickshire, UK, p. 466.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hauser JR and Clausing D (1988). The House of Quality. Harvard Business Review, May–June, pp 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mathieson GL, Handley AH and Rippeth Y (1998). ‘Valuing investments in a digitized ‘system of systems’’. Fourth International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology Nasby Slott, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schlesinger JR (1969). Uses and abuses of analysis. In: Hinrichs HH and Taylor GM (eds). Program Budgeting and Benefit-Cost Analysis; Cases, Test, and Readings. Goodyear Publishing Co., Inc.: Pacific Palisades, CA, p 348.

    Google Scholar 

  7. NATO (1998). NATO Code of Best Practice for C2 Assessment, AC/243(panel7)TR/8 1998 Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quade ES (1989). Analysis for Public Decisions, 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p 102.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eden C and Graham R (1983). Halfway to infinity. J Opl Res Soc 34: 723–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 British Crown copyright

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mathieson, G.L. (2015). Benefits Analysis—A Robust Assessment Approach. In: Forder, R.A. (eds) OR, Defence and Security. The OR Essentials series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454072_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics