Advertisement

The Mimesis that Was Not One: Femininity as Camouflage in the Armed Struggle in West Germany

  • Katharina Karcher
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Postmetaphysical Thought book series (PSPMT)

Abstract

For almost three decades, a few leftist groups fought for a violent revolution in West Germany, of which the ‘Red Army Faction’ (RAF) was probably the most prominent. In the period from 1970 to 1995, the RAF killed 34 persons, and 17 group members died before the group declared the end of their armed struggle in 1998. In January 1972, ‘the Movement of June 2’ (MJ2) emerged in West Berlin as a ‘militant alternative’ to the RAF. Initially, the MJ2 sought to focus on attacks against property. Yet the group did not remain faithful to this principle: they killed two people and hurt many more. By 1980, most members of the MJ2 had laid down their weapons, and the remainder of the group joined the RAF. A third militant leftist organization emerged in Frankfurt in 1973, when Brigitte Kuhlmann and Wilfried Böse founded the ‘Revolutionary Cells’ (RC). By 1978, at least eleven RCs existed in Germany, and a part of the group, the so-called ‘international wing of the RC’, participated in armed conflicts in a range of other countries. Similar to the MJ2, the RC wanted to be a popular guerrilla group. For the most part, they tried not to hurt or kill people, even if they did not always stick with this policy. In the mid-1970s, a group of women in the RC began to execute attacks with an explicitly feminist agenda. In 1984, this group split off from the militant leftist network and formed the autonomous women’s guerrilla movement called ‘Rote Zora’ (RZ).

Keywords

Police Officer Armed Conflict Political Violence Reading Room Feminist Agenda 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Alison, Miranda, Women and Political Violence: Female Combatants in Ethno-National Conflict (Routledge: London, 2009).Google Scholar
  2. Anon., ‘Zweitfrisuren. Später Schock’, Der Spiegel, 10 March 1969, p. 196.Google Scholar
  3. Anon., Der Baader-Meinhof Report. Dokumente, Analysen, Zusammenhänge (Mainz: Haase & Köhler, 1972).Google Scholar
  4. Berberich, Monika, ‘Interview zur Geschichte der RAF’, Initial, 6 (2002), http://www.labourhistory.net (accessed 4 October 2010).Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, Rosi, Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  6. Colebrook, Claire, ‘Certeau and Foucault: Tactics and Strategic Essentialism’, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 100:2 (2001), pp. 543–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Certeau, Michel de, The Practice of Everyday Life, tr. Steven F. Rendall (Los Angeles/London: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  8. Deutscher, Penelope, A Politics of Impossible Difference: The Later Work of Luce Irigaray (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  9. Diewald-Kerkmann, Gisela, Frauen, Terrorismus und Justiz: Prozesse gegen weibliche Mitglieder der RAF und der Bewegung 2. Juni (Düsseldorf: Droste, 2009).Google Scholar
  10. Eager, Paige W., From Freedom Fighters to Terrorists: Women and Political Violence (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
  11. Grosz, Elizabeth, ‘Sexual Difference and the Problem of Essentialism’, in Naomi Schor and Elizabeth Weed (eds), The Essential Difference (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994), pp. 82–97.Google Scholar
  12. Irigaray, Luce, ‘The Other: Woman’, in Judith Squires and Sandra Kemp (eds), Feminisms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), pp. 308–15.Google Scholar
  13. -, This Sex Which Is Not One, tr. Catherine Porter and Carolyn Burke (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  14. -, ‘The Question of the Other’, Yale French Studies, 87 (1995), pp. 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. -, Democracy Begins Between Two (London: Athlone Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  16. -, The Way of Love, tr. Heidi Bostic and Stephen Pluhàcĕk (London: Continuum, 2002).Google Scholar
  17. -, Conversations (Continuum: London, 2008).Google Scholar
  18. -, ‘In Sciences, Is the Subject Sexed?’, To Speak is Never Neutral (London: Continuum, 2009), pp. 247–58.Google Scholar
  19. Nagel, Hans-Dieter, Schwurgerichtsanklage, 10 December 1970, http://labourhistory.net/raf/browse-1.php?cp=2 (accessed 10 November 2010).Google Scholar
  20. Proll, Astrid, Hans und Grete. Bilder der RAF 1967–1977 (Berlin: Aufbau Verlag, 2004).Google Scholar
  21. Rosenfeld, Alan, “‘Anarchist Amazons”: The Gendering of Radicalism in 1970s West Germany’, in Contemporary European History, 19:4 (2010), pp. 351–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider, Hans-Joachim, ‘So fing es an…’, unpublished internal report by the German Central Institute for Social Issues in Berlin.Google Scholar
  23. Sylvester, Christine and Swati Parashar, ‘The Contemporary “Maharabharata” and the many “Draupadis”: Bringing Gender to Critical Terrorism Studies’, in Richard Jackson et al. (eds), Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda (New York: Routledge, 2009), pp. 178–93.Google Scholar
  24. Vojin Vukadinovic, Sasă, ‘Der unbegründete Feminismusverdacht. Die RAF und die Frage der Frauenemanzipation’, in (eds), Terroristinnen — Bagdad ‘77, 2009, pp. 85–106.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Katharina Karcher 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina Karcher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations