Being Passive/Passive Being: Passivity as Self-Expression in Gothic Literature

  • Dana Wight
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Postmetaphysical Thought book series (PSPMT)

Abstract

Psychoanalytic interpretations of subject development generally associate passivity with the negative set of hierarchized binary pairs that include male-female, active-passive and subject-object, in which the passive feminine object is defined against the active masculine subject. Interpretations of passivity focus on its contingency: the passive feminine object is acted upon, determined by an external agency, and submitted to limitations and suffering. Theories of subjectivity rarely acknowledge possible active or strategic forms of passivity: for example, the non-participatory, the uncooperative and the inert. Following Luce Irigaray’s position that the purpose of a larger, feminist, psychoanalytic project is not simply to contribute towards reforming an imaginary in which the woman is subject rather than object — which could merely reproduce a sort of dichotomy — but to destabilize the mechanism of subject formation at its core, passivity must be considered independent of a binary position in order to permit the emergence of a feminine subjectivity that is neither contingent upon nor subordinate to masculine activity. In particular, passivity must be reinterpreted outside the phallogocentric symbolic order, and the resultant connotations of mere receptivity and contingency which associates activity with visibility and presence, so as to blur the borders of subject formation that exclude femininity and feminine agency.

Keywords

Mutual Recognition Relational Identity Oxford English Dictionary Symbolic Order Subject Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Althusser, Louis, ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus’, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, tr. B. Brewster (New York: Monthly Review, 2001), pp. 85–126.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, Judith, ‘Bodies that matter’, ed. C. Burke, N. Schor and M. Whitford, Engaging with Irigaray (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), pp. 141–73.Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, Ed, ‘Matthew Lewis and the Gothic Horror of Obsessional Neurosis’, Studies in the Humanities, 32, 2 (2005), pp. 168–200.Google Scholar
  4. Derrida, Jacques, Dissemination (London: Continuum, 1981).Google Scholar
  5. Freud, Sigmund, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. and tr. James Strachey (London: Hogarth, 1919).Google Scholar
  6. Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich, Phenomenology of Spirit, tr. A.V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, Martin, On the Way to Language, tr. P.D. Hertz (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1971).Google Scholar
  8. Hodge, J., ‘Irigaray Reading Heidegger’, ed. C. Burke, N. Schor and M. Whitford, Engaging with Irigaray (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), pp. 191–210.Google Scholar
  9. Irigaray, Luce, Speculum of the Other Woman, tr. C. Gill (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  10. -, This Sex Which Is Not One, tr. C. Porter with C. Burke (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  11. -, An Ethics of Sexual Difference, tr. C. Burke and G.C. Gill (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  12. -, I Love to You, tr. A. Martin (New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
  13. -, The Forgetting of Air in Martin Heidegger, tr. B. Mader (Austin: Texas University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  14. -, To Be Two, tr. M.M. Rhodes and M.F. Cocito-Monoc (New York: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
  15. -, To Speak is Never Neutral, tr. G. Schwab (New York: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
  16. -, ‘Why Cultivate Difference? Toward a Culture of Two Subjects’ in ‘Dialogues’, special issue of Paragraph, 25 (Edinburgh: University Press, 2002), pp. 79–90.Google Scholar
  17. Lacan, Jacques, Écrits, tr. Bruce Fink (New York: Norton, 2006).Google Scholar
  18. Levinas, Emmanuel, Totality and Infinity, tr. A. Lingis (Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  19. Massé, Michelle, In the Name of Love: Women, Masochism, and the Gothic (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  20. Sandor, Andras, ‘Metaphor or Diaphor? On the Different Particular to Language’, Diogenes, 34 (1986), pp. 106–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Soloviova, Natalia, ‘Radcliffe’s Plot of Female Development’, in Alcindo Pinheiro Sousa, Luisa Marid Rodrqigues Flora and Teresa de Ataide Malafaia (eds), The Crossroads of Gender and Century Endings (Lisbon: Edições Colibri, 2000), pp. 39–47.Google Scholar
  22. Wheelwright, Philip, Metaphor and Reality (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
  23. Winter, Karl J., ‘Sexual/Textual Politics of Terror: Writing and Rewriting the Gothic Genre in the 1790s’, in K. Ackley (ed.), Misogyny in Literature (New York: Garland, 1992), pp. 89–103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dana Wight 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dana Wight

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations