Abstract
The renewed focus on human wellbeing in international policy and academic debate encourages us to think again about how quantitative and qualitative methods are combined in understanding development and poverty. During the 2000s the Q- Squared movement provided a wide range of valuable and insightful material that explored the possibilities for and obstacles to combining qualitative and quantitative research methods (Kanbur and Schaffer 2007). Since then a growing number of national and international statistical agencies have recognised the importance of seeking to assess the impacts of governance and public policy in terms of human wellbeing and in doing so they are adopting a hybrid framework that takes account of the objective and subjective dimensions of human wellbeing (OECD 2011; UK ONS 2011). This chapter presents the argument that if development policy and practice is to promote a focus on human wellbeing then it is necessary to consider what types of data are required to do that. The current ‘business as usual’ in international development focuses mainly on material wellbeing and tentatively and occasionally stretches out to encompass human development outcomes (Alkire and Foster 2011). This chapter argues that in order to assess a more holistic conception of human wellbeing (McGregor and Sumner 2010), it is necessary to generate three types of data: objective, subjective and inter-subjective.1 To achieve this, both quantitative and qualitative methods are required and it is necessary to reconsider how these are sequenced and mixed to generate the data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adato, M. (2007). Combining Survey and Ethnographic Methods to Evaluate Conditional Cash Transfer Programs. Q-Squared Working Paper No. 40. CA: University of Trent.
Alexandrova, A. (2005). Subjective Well-Being and Kahneman’s ‘Objective Happiness’. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 301–324.
Alkire, S. (2008). Choosing Dimensions: The Capability Approach and Multidimensional Poverty. In Kakwani, N. and Silber, J. (eds), The Many Dimensions of Poverty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 89–119.
Alkire, S. and Foster, J. E. (2011). Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95 (7–8), 476–487.
Axford, N., Jodrell, D., and Hobbs, T. (2014). Objective or Subjective Well-Being? In A. Ben-Arieh et al. (eds), Handbook of Child Well-Being. Netherlands: Springer, pp. 2699–2738.
Bebbington, A., Hinojosa-Valencia, L., Munoz, D., and Rojas-Lizarazu, R. E. (2007). Livelihoods and Resource Accessing in the Andes: Desencuentros in Theory and Practice. In Gough, I. and McGregor, J. A. (eds), Wellbeing in Developing Countries: From Theory to Research, pp. 176–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bellagio Initiative. (2012a). Synthesis Report: The Future of Philanthropy and Development in the Pursuit of Human Wellbeing. IDS-Resource Alliance-Rockefeller Foundation. http://www.bellagioinitiative.org/resource-section/bellagio-outputs/#final
Bellagio Initiative. (2012b). Final Report: Human Wellbeing in the 21st Century — Meeting Challenges, Seizing Opportunities. Institute of Development Studies, Rockefeller Foundation. http://www.bellagioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/BELLAGIO_WELLBEING_SPREADS.pdf
Booth, D. (2005). Missing Links in the Politics of Development: Learning from the PRSP Experiment. Working Paper 256. London: ODI.
Camfield, L., Crivello, G. and Woodhead, M. (2008). Well-Being Research in Developing Countries: Reviewing the Role of Qualitative Methods. Social Indicators Research, 90 (1), 5–31.
Camfield, L. and McGregor, J. A. (2009). Editor’s Introduction: Quality of Life and International Development Policy and Practice. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4 (2), 128–134.
Catley, A., Burns, J., Abebe, D. and Suji, O. (2008). Participatory Impact Assessment: A Guide for Practitioners. Boston, MA: Feinstein International Center, Tufts University.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the Last First. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Chang, H.-J. (2003). Kicking Away the Ladder. Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press.
Coase, R. (1998). The New Institutional Economics. American Economic Review, 88 (2), 72–74.
Corsin-Jimenez, A. (ed.) (2008). Culture and Well-Being: Anthropological Approaches to Freedom and Political Ethics. London: Pluto Press.
Cummins, R. (1998). The Second Approximation to an International Standard for Life Satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307–334.
Davey, G. and Selin, H. (2012). Happiness Across Cultures: Views of Happiness and Quality of Life in Non-Western Cultures. Springer: Dordrecht.
Deneulin, S. and McGregor, J. A. (2010). The Capability Approach and the Politics of a Social Conception of Wellbeing. European Journal of Social Theory, 13 (4), 501–519.
Devereux, S., Roelen, K., Béné, C., Chopra, D., Leavy, J. and McGregor, A. (2013). Evaluating Outside the Box: An Alternative Framework for Analysing Social Protection Programmes. IDS Working Paper 431/CSP Working paper 010. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies and Centre for Social Protection.
Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. London: Macmillan.
Dunlop, S., Swales, K., Trebeck, Glinski, J. (2012). The Oxfam Humankind Index for Scotland. Oxfam Research Paper, April 2012, First results. http://www.oxfam.org.uk/scotland/blog/2012/04/~/media/6A6B095DB10E432A88DEBCA5C9 F0F365.ashx
Eyben, R. (2013). Uncovering the Politics of ‘evidence’ and ‘results’. A Framing Paper for Development Practictioners. Downloaded 3 January, 2015, http://bigpushforward.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Uncovering-the-Politics-ofEvidence-and-Results-by-Rosalind-Eyben.pdf
Gough, I. and McGregor, J. A. (eds) (2007). Wellbeing in Developing Countries: From Theory to Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graham, C. (2010). Happiness Around the World: The Paradox of Happy Peasants and Miserable Millionaires. Oxford, UK: OUP.
Harland, C. (2014). Can the Expansion of Social Protection Bring about Social Transformation in African Countries? The Case of Zambia. European Journal of Development Research, 26, 370–386.
Kanbur, R. and Schaffer, P. (2007). Epistemology, Normative Theory and Poverty Analysis: Implications for Q- Squared in Practice. World Development, 35 (2), 183–196.
Layard, R. (2010). Measuring Subjective Wellbeing. Science, 372 (576), 534–535.
MacAuslan, I. and Riemenschneider, N. (2011). Richer but Resented: What Do Cash Transfers Do to Social Relations?. IDS Bulletin, 42 (6), 60–66.
MCDMCH. (2013). The Wider Impacts of Social Protection: Report on the 10% Inclusive SCT: Kalomo, Monze and Choma. Final Draft Report by the Institute of Development Studies (IDS) in association with RuralNet Associates Limited; the Platform for Social Protection, Department for Development Studies, University of Zambia. Ministry of Community Development, Mother and Child Health, Government of Zambia. Lusaka, Zambia.
McGregor, J. A. (2004). Researching Well-Being: Communicating between the Needs of Policy Makers and the Needs of People. Global Social Policy, 4 (3), 337–358.
McGregor, J. A. (2008). Wellbeing, Poverty and Conflict, WeD briefing paper January 2008. Downloaded 20 May 2015, http://www.welldev.org.uk/research/bp/bp1–08.pdf
McGregor, J. A. (2014). Poverty, Wellbeing, and Sustainability. In Atkinson, G., Dietz., S, Neumayer, E. (eds), Handbook of Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
McGregor, J. A., Salagrama, V., and Bahadur, A. V. (2014). Fisheries in Coastal India: Extraction, Livelihoods and a Way of Life. In Gilberthorpe, E. and Hilson, G. (eds), Natural Resource Extraction and Indigenous Livelihoods Development Challenges in an Era of Globalization. Surrey, UK: Ashgate, chapter 5, p. 93.
McGregor, J. A. and Sumner, A. (2010). Beyond Business as Usual: What Might 3-D Wellbeing Contribute to MDG Momentum. IDS Bulletin, 41 (1), 104–112.
Melamed, C. (2011). Does Development Give Poor People What They Want? Background note, ODI. http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/6606.pdf
Merry, S. E. (2011). Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance. Current Anthropology, 11 (S3): S83–95.
Molyneux, M. (2006). Mothers at the Service of the New Poverty Agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s Conditional Transfer Programme. Social Policy and Administration, 40 (4), 425–449.
Narayan, D., Patel, R, Schafft, K., Rademacher, A. and Koch-Schulte, S. (2000). Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2011). How’s Life? Measuring Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264121164-en
ONS. (2011). Measuring what Matters: National Statistician’s Reflections on the National Debate on Measuring National Well-Being. London: ONS.
Oswald, A. et al. (2010). Objective Confirmation of Subjective Measures of Human Well-Being: Evidence from the USA. Science, 327 (576), 576–579.
Popper, K. (1959). Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchison and Co.
Pouw, N. and McGregor J. A. (2014). An Economics of Wellbeing: What Would Economics Look like if it were Focused on Human Wellbeing?. IDS Working Paper 436. Brighton: IDS.
Rodriguez-Takeuchi, L. K. (2014). Incorporating People’s Values in Development: Weighting Alternatives. Methodological Background Note ODI.
Roelen, K. and Devereux, S. (2014). Evaluating Outside the Box: Mixing Methods in Analysing Social Protection Programmes. CDI Practice Paper 06. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Rojas, M. (2004). The Complexity of Well-Being a Life Satisfaction Conception and a Domains-of-Life Approach. Paper for the International Workshop on Researching Well-Being in Developing Countries Hanse Institute for Advanced Study Delmenhorst, near Bremen, Germany, 2–4 July 2004.
Rojas, M. (2008). Experienced Poverty and Income Poverty in Mexico: A Subjective Well-Being Approach. World Development, 36 (6), 1078–1093.
Samman, E. (2007). Psychological and Subjective Wellbeing: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 35 (4), 459–486.
Seers, D. (1967). The Limitations of the Special Case. In Martin, K. and Knapp, J. (eds), The Teaching of Economic Development. London: Gass.
Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. London: Oxford University Press.
Shore, C., and Wright, S. (2015). Governing by Numbers: Audit Culture, Rankings and the New World Order. Social Anthropology, 23: 22–28.
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Sustainable Development, Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, p. 292.
White, S. (2010). Analysing Wellbeing: A Framework for Development Practice. Development in Practice, 20 (2), 158–172.
White, S. (2014). Wellbeing and Quality of Life Assessment: A Practical Guide. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 J. Allister McGregor, Laura Camfield and Sarah Coulthard
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGregor, J.A., Camfield, L., Coulthard, S. (2015). Competing Interpretations: Human Wellbeing and the Use of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. In: Roelen, K., Camfield, L. (eds) Mixed Methods Research in Poverty and Vulnerability. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452511_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452511_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68681-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45251-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)