Skip to main content

Abstract

Bidders and targets in cross-border mergers, in both financial and non-financial industries, appear to perform better than purely in domestic takeovers although this may be due to differences in the bidders’ and targets’ corporate governance regimes. Research findings are, as yet, mixed as to whether private equity financed takeovers earn significant returns on exit. The impact of recent reforms to UK legislation concerning competition rules are yet to be fully understood but whilst it appears to have enabled anti-trust actions to be taken more quickly, some consider the reforms intrusive whilst others consider the reforms are insufficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amess, K., and M. Wright. 2007. “The Wage and Employment Effects of Leveraged Buyouts in the UK.” International Journal of the Economics of Business 14(2): 179–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botsari, A. 2014. “Stock Prices and Earnings Management Around M&A Transactions.” Available at SSRN 2432091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botsari, A., and G. Meeks. 2008. “Do Acquirers Manage Earnings Prior to a Share for Share Bid?” Journal of Business Finance e’r Accounting 35(5–6): 633–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubaker, S., and T. Hamza. 2014. “Short- and Long-Term Wealth Gains from UK Takeovers: The Case of the Financial Industry.” Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 30(4): 1253–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, N.M., C.A. Daly and C.S. Harrington. 2010. “Rhetoric, Argument and Impression Management in Hostile Takeover Defence Documents.” The British Accounting Review 42(4): 253–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campa, J.M., and I. Hernando. 2004. “Shareholder Value Creation in European M&As.” European Financial Management 10(1): 47–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressy, R., F. Munari and A. Malipiero. 2007. “Playing to Their Strengths? Evidence That Specialization in the Private Equity Industry Confers Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Corporate Finance 13(4): 647–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danbolt, J., and G. Maciver. 2012. “Cross-Border versus Domestic Acquisitions and the Impact on Shareholder Wealth.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 39(7–8): 1028–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, K. 2013. Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duso, T., K. Gugler and F. Szücs. 2013. “An Empirical Assessment of the 2004 EU Merger Policy Reform.” The Economic Journal 123(572): F596–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M., and R.W. Masulis. 2005. “The Choice of Payment Method in European Mergers and Acquisitions.” The Journal of Finance 60(3): 1345–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floris, M., D. Grant and L. Cutcher. 2013. “Mining the Discourse: Strategizing During BHP Billiton’s Attempted Acquisition of Rio Tinto.” Journal of Management Studies 50(7): 1185–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridolfsson, S., and Stennek, J. 2005. “Why Mergers Reduce Profits and Raise Share Prices — A Theory of Preemptive Mergers.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3(5): 1083–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, R., and C. Lennox. 2011. “Do Acquirers Disclose Good News or Withhold Bad News When They Finance Their Acquisitions Using Equity?” Review of Accounting Studies 16(1): 183–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goergen, M., N. O’Sullivan and G. Wood. 2011. “Private Equity Takeovers and Employment in the UK: Some Empirical Evidence.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 19(3): 259–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goergen, M., N. O’Sullivan and G. Wood. 2014. “The Employment Consequences of Private Equity Acquisitions: The Case of Institutional Buy Outs.” European Corporate Governance Institute. Brussells, Belgium: European Corporate Governance Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goergen, M., and L. Renneboog. 2004. “Shareholder Wealth Effects of European Domestic and Cross-Border Takeover Bids.” European Financial Management 10(1): 9–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., and S. O’Donohue. 2014. “Do Cross-Border and Domestic Acquisitions Differ? Evidence from the Acquisition of UK Targets.” International Review of Financial Analysis 31: 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorff, J., M. Collins and K. Keasey. 2008. “Investor Protection and the Value Effects of Bank Merger Announcements in Europe and the US.” Journal of Banking e’r Finance 32(7): 1333–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorff, J., M. Collins and K. Keasey. 2010. “Board Monitoring, Regulation, and Performance in the Banking Industry: Evidence from the Market for Corporate Control.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 18(5): 381–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorff, J. and J Nieto, M. 2013. “The Safety and Soundness Effects of Bank M&A in the EU: Does Prudential Regulation Have any Impact?” European Financial Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. 1970. Exit, Voice, Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organisations and States., Harvard, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, L., and G.H. Partington. 2008. “The Motivation for Takeovers in the UK.” Journal of Business Finance e’r Accounting 35 (1–2): 102–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphery-Jenner, M. 2012. “The Impact of the EU Takeover Directive on Takeover Performance and Empire Building.” Journal of Corporate Finance 18(2): 254–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelic, R., and M. Wright. 2011. “Exits, Performance, and Late Stage Private Equity: The Case of UK Management Buy-outs.” European Financial Management 17(3): 560–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. 1989. “Eclipse of the Public Corporation.” Harvard Business Review 67(5): 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbrough, M.D., and H. Louis. 2011. “Voluntary Disclosure to Influence Investor Reactions to Merger Announcements: An Examination of Conference Calls.” The Accounting Review 86(2): 637–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. 2011. “The Non-frustration Rule of the UK City Code on Takeover and Mergers and Related Agency Problems: What Are the Implications for the EC Takeover Directive?” Columbia Journal of European Law Online 17: 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martynova, M., and L. Renneboog. 2011. “The Performance of the European Market for Corporate Control: Evidence from the Fifth Takeover Wave.” European Financial Management 17(2): 208–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschieri, C., and J.M. Campa. 2009. “The European M&A industry: A Market in the Process of Construction.” The Academy of Management Perspectives 23(4): 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoskelainen, E., and M. Wright. 2007. “The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Value Increase in Leveraged Buyouts.” Journal of Corporate Finance 13(4): 511–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikpay, A., and D. Taylor. 2014. “The New UK Competition Regime: Radically Different or More of the Same?” Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 5(5): 278–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, N., and P. Wong. 1998. “The Impact of Board Composition and Ownership on the Nature and Outcome of UK Takeovers.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 6(2): 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog, L., and Y. Zhao. 2014. “Director Networks and Takeovers.” Journal of Corporate Finance 28: 218–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siougle, G., S.I. Spyrou and A.E. Tsekrekos. 2014. “Conference Calls around Merger and Acquisition Announcements: Do They Reduce Information Asymmetry? UK Evidence.” Research in International Business and Finance 30:148–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. 2007. Inside the Dark Box: Shedding Light on Private Equity Work Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toxvaerd, F. 2008. “Strategic Merger Waves: A Theory of Musical Chairs.” Journal of Economic Theory 140(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, A. 2008. “The Impact of Private Equity on European Companies and Workers: Key Issues and a Review of the Evidence.” Industrial Relations Journal 39(6): 548–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, C., P. Jones and M. Wright. 2008. “Public to Private Transactions, Private Equity and Performance in the UK: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Going Private.” SSRN Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 William Forbes and Lynn Hodgkinson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forbes, W., Hodgkinson, L. (2015). The Market for Corporate Control. In: Corporate Governance in the United Kingdom: Past, Present and Future. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137451743_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics