Institutional Investors



Institutional shareholders are increasingly the voice of equity capital and it is the threat of them exiting a company’s shareholder register that disciplines management in their control of the corporation. An active market for corporate control, institutionalized via meetings/discussions between fund managers analysts and the senior management team of the corporation subject the board of executives of the corporation to constant interrogation of the viability of their (shareholder) value addition strategy. Recently John Kay has criticized institutional shareholders for their short-term obsession with shareholder wealth at the expense of longer term, investment-led, corporate success.


Corporate Governance Institutional Investor Pension Fund Fund Manager Discount Cash Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abraham, S., & P. Cox. 2007. “Analysing the Determinants of Narrative Risk Information in the UK FTSE 100 Annual Reports.” British Accounting Review 39: 227–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, J., and P. Moizer. 1984. “A Survey of the Investments Used by UK Investment Analysts to Appraise Investments in Ordinary Shares.” Accounting and Business Research 14: 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, R., J. Hendry, J. Roberts and P. Sanderson. 2012. “Can Company Fund Manager Meetings Convey Informational Benefits? Exploring the Rationalisation of Equity Investment Decision Making by UK Fund Managers.” Accounting, Organisation and Society 37: 207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becht, M., J. Franks and C. Mayer. 2010. “Returns to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Clinical Study of Hermes UK Focus Fund.” Review of Financial Studies 23: 3093–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox, P., S. Brammer and A. Millington. 2007. “Pension Fund Manager Tournaments and Attitudes towards Corporate Characteristics.” Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting 34: 1307–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demiakos, E., N. Strong and W. Martin. 2004. “What Valuation Models Do Analysts Use?” Accounting Horizons 18: 221–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hendry, J., P. Sanderson, R. Barker and J. Roberts. 2006. “Owners or Traders? Conceptualisations of Institutional Investors and Their Relationshipwith Corporate Managers.” Human Relations 59: 1101–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirschman, A. 1970. “Exit, Voice, Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organisations and States. Harvard, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Holland, J. 1998a. “Private Disclosure and Financial Reporting.” Accounting & Business Research 28: 255–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland, J. 1998b. “Private Voluntary Disclosure, Financal Intermediation and Market EfFiciency.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 25: 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holland, J. 2001. “Financial Institutions, Intangibles and Corporate Governance.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 14: 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holland, J. 2004. “Corporate Intangibles, Value Relevance and Disclosure Content” In ICAS (ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Institute of Chartered Accountants of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  13. Holland, J. 2005. “A Grounded Theory of Corporate Disclosure.” Accounting and Business Research 35: 249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holland, J. 2006. “A Model of Corporate Financial Communications.” In ICAS (ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Institute of Chartered of Scotland.Google Scholar
  15. Kay, J. 2012. “The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-Term Decision-Making.” In BUSINESS, I. A. S. (ed.). London: UK Government.Google Scholar
  16. Lysandrou, P., and D. Stoyanova. 2007. “The Anachronism of the Voice-Exit Paradigm.” Corporate Governannce: An International Review 15: 1070–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pound, J. 1988. “Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight.” Journal of Financial Economics 20: 237–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roberts, J., P. Sanderson, R. Barker and J. Hendry. 2006. “In the Mirror of the Market: The Disciplinary Effects of Company/Fund Manager Meetings.” Accountinmg. Organisazations and Society 31: 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© William Forbes and Lynn Hodgkinson 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loughborough UniversityUK
  2. 2.Bangor Business SchoolUK

Personalised recommendations