Skip to main content

Continuation of Status Quo under Colonial Economic Drain, 1910–45

  • Chapter

Abstract

During the late 19th century, the Joseon dynasty in Korea was already weak and counting its days. The royal authority was under Chinese suzerainty with tributary relations as a guiding framework for the bilateral relationship. The Korean state under the late Joseon dynasty can be regarded as predatory and rent-seeking, marred by rampant corruption.1 The Korean elite Yangban class, comprised of officials and aristocrats, led a life of luxury at the expense of the rural peasantry. The state’s capacity to extract revenues and exert control over the powerful agrarian elite was rather poor. This weakness of the late Joseon state created a power vacuum that drew foreign powers to compete for influence over the Korean peninsula. The relative decline of agrarian China and post-Meiji industrializing Japan provided a favorable chance for Japan to occupy and colonize the Korean peninsula, which it had been trying to do since centuries. After the Meiji Restoration in 1868, and on the ruins of samurai feudalism, an industrialized-militarized Japan emerged. The Japanese quickly learned crucial lessons from the developmental experience of European countries and carefully adopted them to their own conditions. Two events — the defeat of China in 1895 and the victory over Russia in 1905 — mark a watershed in the growth of the Japanese military-industrial complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The Joseon state, which lasted over 500 years, exercised wide-ranging power as a vassal to Chinese throne, however, in reality, the power of state was limited to moral persuasion and symbolically upholding the political, intellectual and cultural prestige of the state. A classic case of ‘normative centralization,’ Joseon state had only a few political activities. In other words, the Joseon state created a centralized administrative apparatus that was closely aligned with the local Yangban elites. For more details, see John B. Duncan (2000) The Origins of the Choson Dynasty, Seattle: University of Washington Press;

    Google Scholar 

  2. and Byong-ik Koh (1976–7) ‘Confucian Ideology and Political Equilibrium in East Asia,’ Social Science Journal, 4, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The majority of officials in the colonial administration were Japanese nationals who provided bottom-up support to the centralized colonial state in Korea. For further information, see Jun Uchida (2011) Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in Korea, 1876–1945, in Harvard East Asian Monographs, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Taylor Atkins (2010), Primitive Selves: Koreana in the Japanese Colonial Gaze, 1910–1945, Berkeley: University of California Press;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gi-Wook Shin (2006) ‘Colonial Racism and Nationalism,’ Ethnic Nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, Politics, and Legacy, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mark E. Caprio (2009) ‘Radical Assimilation under Wartime Conditions,’ in Japanese Assimilation Policies in Colonial Korea, 1910–1945, Seattle: University of Washington Press;

    Google Scholar 

  7. and Peter Duus (1995) The Abacus and the Sword: The Japanese Penetration of Korea, 1895–1910, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Among the notable Korea-owned industries were: Kyongsong Cord Company, founded by the Yun family in 1911; Kyongbang Textile Company, founded by Kochang Kims of North Cholla province; Hanil Bank, founded by Min Kyu-sik; Hwasin Department Store, owned by Pak Hung-sik. For details, see Carter J. Eckert (1991) Offspring of Empire: The Ko’chang Kims and the Origins of Korean Capitalism, Seattle: University of Washington Press;

    Google Scholar 

  9. and Dennis L. McNamara (1989) ‘The Keisho and the Korean Business Elite,’ Journal of Asian Studies, 48(2), May, 310–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Close alignment of interests between the Korean Yangban class entrepreneurs and the colonial administration has seen them termed ‘collaborators’ who carefully promoted self-interests at the cost of the Korean national interest. For details, see Yumi Moon (2013) Populist Collaborators: The Ilchinhoe and the Japanese Colonization of Korea, 1896–1910, Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korea became part of the emerging Japanese military-industrial complex to provide support for imperialist ambitions, specifically facilitating empire-wide movement of troops that helped in the conquest of Manchuria and made deeper inroads into China. For details, see Ian Gow (2004) Military Intervention in Pre-War Japanese Politics: Admiral Kato Kanji and the Washington System, London, New York: Routledge Curzon;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glenn D. Hook (2007) Militarization and Demilitarization in Contemporary Japan, London & New York: Taylor & Francis;

    Google Scholar 

  13. John M. Maki (1945) Japanese Militarism, Past and Present, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For details, see Andrew C. Nam (1988) Korea: Tradition and Transformation, Elizabeth, NJ: Hollym International, 324.

    Google Scholar 

  15. More details on the ‘March First Movement,’ see Frank Prentiss Baldwin, Jr. (1969) ‘The March First Movement: Korean Challenge and Japanese Response’, PhD dissertation, New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  16. For details, see Yumi Moon (2013) Populist Collaborators: The Ilchinhoe and the Japanese Colonization of Korea, 1896–1910, Ithaca: Cornell University Press;

    Google Scholar 

  17. and Youn-Tae Chung (2002) ‘Refracted Modernity and the Issue of Pro-Japanese Collaborators in Korea,’ Korea Journal, 43(4) (Autumn), 18–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Jitendra Uttam

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uttam, J. (2014). Continuation of Status Quo under Colonial Economic Drain, 1910–45. In: The Political Economy of Korea. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137451248_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics