Abstract
In July 2001, as part of a comprehensive new policy, Portugal decriminalized use, acquisition, and possession of all illicit drugs when conducted for personal use. Sales of all illicit drugs remained as criminal offenses. Ten years on, the reform has attracted considerable international attention. It has also been the subject of a number of divergent accounts on its impacts, with some commentators offering diametrically opposed policy conclusions from their evidence-informed analyses. Consequently, this is a policy choice that has been deemed both a “disastrous failure” and a “resounding success.”3 As two of the participants in this debate, we know that drug law reform is invariably difficult to study and involves sifting through multiple versions of evidence, but the divergences, contested debates, and assertions of “deceit,” “misinformation,” and “manipulation”4 have given rise to a clear example of “dueling certitudes”5 which is both frustrating and instructive. In an era where evidence, defined here as the body of putatively valid and reliable knowledge about drug use and related harms, is often implied to be the tested, trustworthy tool for generating policies “devoid of dogma”6 this case study provides a much-needed opportunity lo examine the way all sides of the drug policy debate can call upon and alternatively use or misuse evidence to feed into discussions of the worth, efficacy, and desirability of different illicit drug policies.
This article was original published in Drug and Alcohol Review 31. (2012): 101–113 (Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs), reproduced with permission of John Wiley and Sons.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. Pinto Coelho, The ‘resounding success’ of Portuguese drug policy: the power of an attractive fallacy (Lisboa: Associaçao para uma Portugal livre de drogas, 2010).
G. Greenwald, Drug decriminalization in Portugal: lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies (Washington, DC: CATO institute, 2009).
C. F. Manski, Policy analysis with incredible certitude (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010).
M. Monaghan, Evidence versus politics: exploiting research in UK drug policy making? (Bristol: Policy Press, 2011).
Greenwald, Drug decriminalization in Portugal: C.E. Hughes and A. Stevens, “What can we learn from the Portuguese decriminalization of illicit drugs?” British Journal Criminology 50 (2010): 999–1022.
P. Vale de Andrade and L. Garapinha, “Drag decriminalisation in Portugal,” British Medical journal 341 (2010): c4554
P. Vale de Andrade and L. Garapinha, “Drug decri minai isation in Portugal: reply,” British Medical Journal 341 (2010): c4554.
M. Pinto Coelho, Best Portugal advice to the world: don ‘i follow’ us (Stockholm: World Federation Against Drags, 2011).
M. Pinto Coelho, “Re: drug decri minalisation in Portugal,” British Medical Journal 341 (2010): c4554.
B. Hibell, U. Guttonnsson, S. Ahlström, et al. The 2007 ESPAD report— Substance use among students in 35 European countries (Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol arid Other Drugs (CAN) and the Pompidou Group at ihe Council of Europe., 2009).
M. Matos, C. Simões, T. Caspar, et al.. Consumo de substantias dos adolescentes Portugueses: estilo de vida? A procura de urn estìlo? (Lisboa: IDT, 2008
M. Matos, C. Simões, S. Carvalhosa, C. Reis, Aventura social & saúde. A saúde dos adolescentes Portugueses. Estudo national da rede Europeia HBSC/OMS (1998) (Lisboa: FMH/PEPT-Saúde, 2000)
M. Matos, Equipa do projecto aventura social e saúde. Aventura social & saúde. A saúde dos adolescentes Portugueses (Quatro anos depois) (lisboa: FMH, 2003
F. Feijao and E. Lavado, Inquérito national em meio escolar—2001— Ensino seamdãrio (Lisboa: IDT, 2004)
R Feijao, Inquériío national em meio escolar—2006: Consumo de drogas e outras substantias psicoactivas: uma abord-agern integrada: Resultados preliminares. 18 Abril 2008. (Evora: Instiiuto da Droga e da Toxieodcpcndência, 2008).
B. Hibeli, U. Guttonnsson, S. Ahlström, et al., The 2007 ESPAD report— Substance use among students in 35 European countries (Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN) and the Pompidou Group at the Council of Europe, 2009)
F. Feijao and E. Lavado, Os adolescentes e a droga—Portugal 2003: estucio sobre o consumo de alcool, tabaco e droga, em alunos do ensino publico—Portugal continental/2003 (ECATD/2003) (Lisboa: Observatório de Drogas e Toxi-codependências, Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependenda, 2003)
F. Feijão, Drug use among teenagers, by age group: Portugal 2003–2007 (ECATD/FSPAD) (Lisbon: IDT 2009).
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Methodology—World drug report 2010 (Geneva: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2010.
World Health Organization, Guide to drug abuse epidemiology. WHO/MSD/ MSB/00.3 (Geneva: WHO, 2000).
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Annual report 2010: the state of the drugs problem in Europe (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2010).
World Health Organization, International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (Geneva: WHO, 2007).
C. Tavares and G. Thomas, Statistics in focus: population and social conditions 19/2008: Eurostat (Luxembourg: Eurostat, 2008).
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World drug report 2009 (Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2009).
P. Sabatìer and H. Jenkins-Smith, eds., Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992).
S. E. Messamore, “if cannabis is legalized, Portugal could be a window into California’s future” (San Rafael, CA: The California Independent Voter Network) June 26, 2010. http://www.caivn.org/artic1e/2010/06/2ó/if-cannabis-legalized-portugal-could-be-window-califomias-future# (accessed Mardi 11, 2011).
T. R Babor, J. P. Caulkins, G. Edwards, et al., Drug policy and the public good (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
A. Stevens, Drugs, (rime and public health: the political economy of drug policy (Abingdon: Routìedge, 2011).
Global Commission on Drugs Policy, War on drugs (Ipanema: Brazil Global Commission on Drugs Policy, 2011).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Caitlin Elizabeth Hughes and Alex Stevens
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, C.E., Stevens, A. (2015). A Resounding Success or a Disastrous Failure: Re-examining the Interpretation of Evidence on the Portuguese Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs. In: Brienen, M.W., Rosen, J.D. (eds) New Approaches to Drug Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137450999_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137450999_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56765-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45099-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)